Achieving Predictability in Augmentation Mastopexy: An Update

• Main Authors: Amy S. Xue, MD, Erez Dayan, MD, Rod J. Rohrich, MD
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Wolters Kluwer 2020-09-01
• Series: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
• Online Access: http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002784

Background:. One-stage augmentation mastopexy is a challenging procedure, with the highest cited revision rates in plastic surgery. This is because when mastopexy and augmentation are performed together, they lead to opposing forces, which must be balanced carefully to avoid complications. The goal of this study was to revisit a previously described predictable and safe approach to one-stage augmentation mastopexy, and provide long-term updated results. Methods:. One hundred seventy-one patients who underwent augmentation mastopexy, performed by a single surgeon (R.J.R.), were included in this retrospective review between January 2005 and January 2019. Wise pattern mastopexy with wide pedicle was performed before placement of a small subpectoral implant. Demographic information, preoperative breast measurements, intraoperative technique, implant choice, and postoperative complications were analyzed. Specifically, postoperative measurement of vertical limbs was performed to assess long-term elongation of the lower breast pole. Results:. Cumulative complication rate was 11.7%. This rate decreased to 6% in the last 88 patients in this series as the technique matured. The most common complication was revision for implant size exchange. Long-term follow-up demonstrated elongation of nipple-to-inframammary fold distance by 1.0–2.2 cm. There was no recurrence of ptosis requiring reoperation. Conclusions:. This one-stage augmentation mastopexy technique provides a safe and reliable surgical approach with predictable and minimal elongation of the lower breast pole. The reoperation rate of this technique is less than half of >20% revision rate currently cited in the literature.