Comparing the Performance of Ground Filtering Algorithms for Terrain Modeling in a Forest Environment Using Airborne LiDAR Data

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of four ground filtering algorithms to generate digital terrain models (DTMs) from airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data. The study area is a forest environment located in Washington state, USA with distinct classes of land u...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carlos Alberto Silva, Carine Klauberg, Ângela Maria Klein Hentz, Ana Paula Dalla Corte, Uelison Ribeiro, Veraldo Liesenberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro 2018-02-01
Series:Floresta e Ambiente
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872018000200105&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-88084ba8d221414381f3d8fa558281c8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-88084ba8d221414381f3d8fa558281c82020-11-25T00:22:45ZengUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de JaneiroFloresta e Ambiente2179-80872018-02-0125210.1590/2179-8087.015016S2179-80872018000200105Comparing the Performance of Ground Filtering Algorithms for Terrain Modeling in a Forest Environment Using Airborne LiDAR DataCarlos Alberto SilvaCarine KlaubergÂngela Maria Klein HentzAna Paula Dalla CorteUelison RibeiroVeraldo LiesenbergABSTRACT The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of four ground filtering algorithms to generate digital terrain models (DTMs) from airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data. The study area is a forest environment located in Washington state, USA with distinct classes of land use and land cover (e.g., shrubland, grassland, bare soil, and three forest types according to tree density and silvicultural interventions: closed-canopy forest, intermediate-canopy forest, and open-canopy forest). The following four ground filtering algorithms were assessed: Weighted Linear Least Squares (WLS), Multi-scale Curvature Classification (MCC), Progressive Morphological Filter (PMF), and Progressive Triangulated Irregular Network (PTIN). The four algorithms performed well across the land cover, with the PMF yielding the least number of points classified as ground. Statistical differences between the pairs of DTMs were small, except for the PMF due to the highest errors. Because the forestry sector requires constant updating of topographical maps, open-source ground filtering algorithms, such as WLS and MCC, performed very well on planted forest environments. However, the performance of such filters should also be evaluated over complex native forest environments.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872018000200105&lng=en&tlng=enconiferground filteringdigital terrain modelpoint cloud
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carlos Alberto Silva
Carine Klauberg
Ângela Maria Klein Hentz
Ana Paula Dalla Corte
Uelison Ribeiro
Veraldo Liesenberg
spellingShingle Carlos Alberto Silva
Carine Klauberg
Ângela Maria Klein Hentz
Ana Paula Dalla Corte
Uelison Ribeiro
Veraldo Liesenberg
Comparing the Performance of Ground Filtering Algorithms for Terrain Modeling in a Forest Environment Using Airborne LiDAR Data
Floresta e Ambiente
conifer
ground filtering
digital terrain model
point cloud
author_facet Carlos Alberto Silva
Carine Klauberg
Ângela Maria Klein Hentz
Ana Paula Dalla Corte
Uelison Ribeiro
Veraldo Liesenberg
author_sort Carlos Alberto Silva
title Comparing the Performance of Ground Filtering Algorithms for Terrain Modeling in a Forest Environment Using Airborne LiDAR Data
title_short Comparing the Performance of Ground Filtering Algorithms for Terrain Modeling in a Forest Environment Using Airborne LiDAR Data
title_full Comparing the Performance of Ground Filtering Algorithms for Terrain Modeling in a Forest Environment Using Airborne LiDAR Data
title_fullStr Comparing the Performance of Ground Filtering Algorithms for Terrain Modeling in a Forest Environment Using Airborne LiDAR Data
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Performance of Ground Filtering Algorithms for Terrain Modeling in a Forest Environment Using Airborne LiDAR Data
title_sort comparing the performance of ground filtering algorithms for terrain modeling in a forest environment using airborne lidar data
publisher Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
series Floresta e Ambiente
issn 2179-8087
publishDate 2018-02-01
description ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of four ground filtering algorithms to generate digital terrain models (DTMs) from airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data. The study area is a forest environment located in Washington state, USA with distinct classes of land use and land cover (e.g., shrubland, grassland, bare soil, and three forest types according to tree density and silvicultural interventions: closed-canopy forest, intermediate-canopy forest, and open-canopy forest). The following four ground filtering algorithms were assessed: Weighted Linear Least Squares (WLS), Multi-scale Curvature Classification (MCC), Progressive Morphological Filter (PMF), and Progressive Triangulated Irregular Network (PTIN). The four algorithms performed well across the land cover, with the PMF yielding the least number of points classified as ground. Statistical differences between the pairs of DTMs were small, except for the PMF due to the highest errors. Because the forestry sector requires constant updating of topographical maps, open-source ground filtering algorithms, such as WLS and MCC, performed very well on planted forest environments. However, the performance of such filters should also be evaluated over complex native forest environments.
topic conifer
ground filtering
digital terrain model
point cloud
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872018000200105&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT carlosalbertosilva comparingtheperformanceofgroundfilteringalgorithmsforterrainmodelinginaforestenvironmentusingairbornelidardata
AT carineklauberg comparingtheperformanceofgroundfilteringalgorithmsforterrainmodelinginaforestenvironmentusingairbornelidardata
AT angelamariakleinhentz comparingtheperformanceofgroundfilteringalgorithmsforterrainmodelinginaforestenvironmentusingairbornelidardata
AT anapauladallacorte comparingtheperformanceofgroundfilteringalgorithmsforterrainmodelinginaforestenvironmentusingairbornelidardata
AT uelisonribeiro comparingtheperformanceofgroundfilteringalgorithmsforterrainmodelinginaforestenvironmentusingairbornelidardata
AT veraldoliesenberg comparingtheperformanceofgroundfilteringalgorithmsforterrainmodelinginaforestenvironmentusingairbornelidardata
_version_ 1725358374889979904