Genetic Evaluation of Inpatient Neonatal and Infantile Congenital Heart Defects: New Findings and Review of the Literature

The use of clinical genetics evaluations and testing for infants with congenital heart defects (CHDs) is subject to practice variation. This single-institution cross-sectional study of all inpatient infants with severe CHDs evaluated 440 patients using a cardiovascular genetics service (2014–2019)....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benjamin M. Helm, Benjamin J. Landis, Stephanie M. Ware
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
Series:Genes
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/12/8/1244
id doaj-882703b5dfcb4f94ba771a46c94f8a24
record_format Article
spelling doaj-882703b5dfcb4f94ba771a46c94f8a242021-08-26T13:47:04ZengMDPI AGGenes2073-44252021-08-01121244124410.3390/genes12081244Genetic Evaluation of Inpatient Neonatal and Infantile Congenital Heart Defects: New Findings and Review of the LiteratureBenjamin M. Helm0Benjamin J. Landis1Stephanie M. Ware2Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USADepartment of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USADepartment of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USAThe use of clinical genetics evaluations and testing for infants with congenital heart defects (CHDs) is subject to practice variation. This single-institution cross-sectional study of all inpatient infants with severe CHDs evaluated 440 patients using a cardiovascular genetics service (2014–2019). In total, 376 (85.5%) had chromosome microarray (CMA), of which 55 (14.6%) were diagnostic in syndromic (N = 35) or isolated (N = 20) presentations. Genetic diagnoses were made in all CHD classes. Diagnostic yield was higher in syndromic appearing infants, but geneticists’ dysmorphology exams lacked complete sensitivity and 6.5% of isolated CHD cases had diagnostic CMA. Interestingly, diagnostic results (15.8%) in left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) defects occurred most often in patients with isolated CHD. Geneticists’ evaluations were particularly important for second-tier molecular testing (10.5% test-specific yield), bringing the overall genetic testing yield to 17%. We assess these results in the context of previous studies. Cumulative evidence provides a rationale for comprehensive, standardized genetic evaluation in infants with severe CHDs regardless of lesion or extracardiac anomalies because genetic diagnoses that impact care are easily missed. These findings support routine CMA testing in infants with severe CHDs and underscore the importance of copy-number analysis with newer testing strategies such as exome and genome sequencing.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/12/8/1244congenital heart diseasechromosome microarray analysisgenetic testingmutationdysmorphiccardiac classification
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Benjamin M. Helm
Benjamin J. Landis
Stephanie M. Ware
spellingShingle Benjamin M. Helm
Benjamin J. Landis
Stephanie M. Ware
Genetic Evaluation of Inpatient Neonatal and Infantile Congenital Heart Defects: New Findings and Review of the Literature
Genes
congenital heart disease
chromosome microarray analysis
genetic testing
mutation
dysmorphic
cardiac classification
author_facet Benjamin M. Helm
Benjamin J. Landis
Stephanie M. Ware
author_sort Benjamin M. Helm
title Genetic Evaluation of Inpatient Neonatal and Infantile Congenital Heart Defects: New Findings and Review of the Literature
title_short Genetic Evaluation of Inpatient Neonatal and Infantile Congenital Heart Defects: New Findings and Review of the Literature
title_full Genetic Evaluation of Inpatient Neonatal and Infantile Congenital Heart Defects: New Findings and Review of the Literature
title_fullStr Genetic Evaluation of Inpatient Neonatal and Infantile Congenital Heart Defects: New Findings and Review of the Literature
title_full_unstemmed Genetic Evaluation of Inpatient Neonatal and Infantile Congenital Heart Defects: New Findings and Review of the Literature
title_sort genetic evaluation of inpatient neonatal and infantile congenital heart defects: new findings and review of the literature
publisher MDPI AG
series Genes
issn 2073-4425
publishDate 2021-08-01
description The use of clinical genetics evaluations and testing for infants with congenital heart defects (CHDs) is subject to practice variation. This single-institution cross-sectional study of all inpatient infants with severe CHDs evaluated 440 patients using a cardiovascular genetics service (2014–2019). In total, 376 (85.5%) had chromosome microarray (CMA), of which 55 (14.6%) were diagnostic in syndromic (N = 35) or isolated (N = 20) presentations. Genetic diagnoses were made in all CHD classes. Diagnostic yield was higher in syndromic appearing infants, but geneticists’ dysmorphology exams lacked complete sensitivity and 6.5% of isolated CHD cases had diagnostic CMA. Interestingly, diagnostic results (15.8%) in left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) defects occurred most often in patients with isolated CHD. Geneticists’ evaluations were particularly important for second-tier molecular testing (10.5% test-specific yield), bringing the overall genetic testing yield to 17%. We assess these results in the context of previous studies. Cumulative evidence provides a rationale for comprehensive, standardized genetic evaluation in infants with severe CHDs regardless of lesion or extracardiac anomalies because genetic diagnoses that impact care are easily missed. These findings support routine CMA testing in infants with severe CHDs and underscore the importance of copy-number analysis with newer testing strategies such as exome and genome sequencing.
topic congenital heart disease
chromosome microarray analysis
genetic testing
mutation
dysmorphic
cardiac classification
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/12/8/1244
work_keys_str_mv AT benjaminmhelm geneticevaluationofinpatientneonatalandinfantilecongenitalheartdefectsnewfindingsandreviewoftheliterature
AT benjaminjlandis geneticevaluationofinpatientneonatalandinfantilecongenitalheartdefectsnewfindingsandreviewoftheliterature
AT stephaniemware geneticevaluationofinpatientneonatalandinfantilecongenitalheartdefectsnewfindingsandreviewoftheliterature
_version_ 1721193161867395072