The Efficacy and Safety of Doripenem in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Infections—A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of doripenem on treating patients with acute bacterial infections. The Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched up to April 2019. Only randomized clinical trials comparing doripenem and other comparators for the treatment of acute bacteri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chih-Cheng Lai, I-Ling Cheng, Yu-Hung Chen, Hung-Jen Tang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-07-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/8/7/958
id doaj-88550d7015ad4eef84ff723ebeb02f11
record_format Article
spelling doaj-88550d7015ad4eef84ff723ebeb02f112020-11-24T21:31:46ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832019-07-018795810.3390/jcm8070958jcm8070958The Efficacy and Safety of Doripenem in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Infections—A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled TrialsChih-Cheng Lai0I-Ling Cheng1Yu-Hung Chen2Hung-Jen Tang3Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Liouying 73657, TaiwanDepartment of Pharmacy, Chi Mei Medical Center, Liouying 73657, TaiwanDepartment of Pharmacy, Chi Mei Medical Center, Liouying 73657, TaiwanDepartment of Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan 71004, TaiwanThis study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of doripenem on treating patients with acute bacterial infections. The Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched up to April 2019. Only randomized clinical trials comparing doripenem and other comparators for the treatment of acute bacterial infection were included. The primary outcome was the clinical success rate and the secondary outcomes were microbiological eradication rate and risk of adverse events. Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Overall, doripenem had a similar clinical success rate with comparators (odds ratio [OR], 1.15; 95% CI, 0.79–1.66, I2 = 58%). Similar clinical success rates were noted between doripenem and comparators for pneumonia (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.46–1.53, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 72%) and for intra-abdominal infections (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.57–1.72). For complicated urinary tract infection, doripenem was associated with higher success rate than comparators (OR, 1.89, 95% CI, 1.13–3.17, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%). The pool analysis comparing doripenem and other carbapenems showed no significant differences between each other (OR, 0.96, 95% CI, 0.59–1.58, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 63%). Doripenem also had a similar microbiological eradication rate with comparators (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.86–1.36, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%). Finally, doripenem had a similar risk of treatment-emergent adverse events as comparators (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.83–1.17, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 33%). In conclusion, the clinical efficacy of doripenem is as high as that of the comparator drugs in the treatment of acute bacterial infection; furthermore, this antibiotic is as well tolerated as the comparators.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/8/7/958doripenemacute bacterial infectionpneumoniaintra-abdominal infectioncomplicated urinary tract infection
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chih-Cheng Lai
I-Ling Cheng
Yu-Hung Chen
Hung-Jen Tang
spellingShingle Chih-Cheng Lai
I-Ling Cheng
Yu-Hung Chen
Hung-Jen Tang
The Efficacy and Safety of Doripenem in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Infections—A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Journal of Clinical Medicine
doripenem
acute bacterial infection
pneumonia
intra-abdominal infection
complicated urinary tract infection
author_facet Chih-Cheng Lai
I-Ling Cheng
Yu-Hung Chen
Hung-Jen Tang
author_sort Chih-Cheng Lai
title The Efficacy and Safety of Doripenem in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Infections—A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short The Efficacy and Safety of Doripenem in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Infections—A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full The Efficacy and Safety of Doripenem in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Infections—A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr The Efficacy and Safety of Doripenem in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Infections—A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed The Efficacy and Safety of Doripenem in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Infections—A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort efficacy and safety of doripenem in the treatment of acute bacterial infections—a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
publisher MDPI AG
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
issn 2077-0383
publishDate 2019-07-01
description This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of doripenem on treating patients with acute bacterial infections. The Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched up to April 2019. Only randomized clinical trials comparing doripenem and other comparators for the treatment of acute bacterial infection were included. The primary outcome was the clinical success rate and the secondary outcomes were microbiological eradication rate and risk of adverse events. Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Overall, doripenem had a similar clinical success rate with comparators (odds ratio [OR], 1.15; 95% CI, 0.79–1.66, I2 = 58%). Similar clinical success rates were noted between doripenem and comparators for pneumonia (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.46–1.53, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 72%) and for intra-abdominal infections (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.57–1.72). For complicated urinary tract infection, doripenem was associated with higher success rate than comparators (OR, 1.89, 95% CI, 1.13–3.17, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%). The pool analysis comparing doripenem and other carbapenems showed no significant differences between each other (OR, 0.96, 95% CI, 0.59–1.58, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 63%). Doripenem also had a similar microbiological eradication rate with comparators (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.86–1.36, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%). Finally, doripenem had a similar risk of treatment-emergent adverse events as comparators (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.83–1.17, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 33%). In conclusion, the clinical efficacy of doripenem is as high as that of the comparator drugs in the treatment of acute bacterial infection; furthermore, this antibiotic is as well tolerated as the comparators.
topic doripenem
acute bacterial infection
pneumonia
intra-abdominal infection
complicated urinary tract infection
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/8/7/958
work_keys_str_mv AT chihchenglai theefficacyandsafetyofdoripeneminthetreatmentofacutebacterialinfectionsasystemicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT ilingcheng theefficacyandsafetyofdoripeneminthetreatmentofacutebacterialinfectionsasystemicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yuhungchen theefficacyandsafetyofdoripeneminthetreatmentofacutebacterialinfectionsasystemicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT hungjentang theefficacyandsafetyofdoripeneminthetreatmentofacutebacterialinfectionsasystemicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chihchenglai efficacyandsafetyofdoripeneminthetreatmentofacutebacterialinfectionsasystemicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT ilingcheng efficacyandsafetyofdoripeneminthetreatmentofacutebacterialinfectionsasystemicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yuhungchen efficacyandsafetyofdoripeneminthetreatmentofacutebacterialinfectionsasystemicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT hungjentang efficacyandsafetyofdoripeneminthetreatmentofacutebacterialinfectionsasystemicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
_version_ 1725959848823095296