Frontiers: Authority, Precarity and Insurgency at the Edge of the State

Two home-grown insurgencies  arose in Nigeria after the return to civilian rule in 1999: Boko Haram in the Muslim northeast, the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND) in the oil producing and Christian southeast. The two insurgencies arose, I argue, from frontier spaces in which th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michael J Watts
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Université de Reims Champagne-Ardennes 2017-09-01
Series:L'Espace Politique
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/espacepolitique/4336
id doaj-885dfc8156784d80b0fb44938382ddfb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-885dfc8156784d80b0fb44938382ddfb2020-11-24T23:07:02ZengUniversité de Reims Champagne-ArdennesL'Espace Politique1958-55002017-09-013210.4000/espacepolitique.4336Frontiers: Authority, Precarity and Insurgency at the Edge of the StateMichael J WattsTwo home-grown insurgencies  arose in Nigeria after the return to civilian rule in 1999: Boko Haram in the Muslim northeast, the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND) in the oil producing and Christian southeast. The two insurgencies arose, I argue, from frontier spaces in which the limits of state authority and legitimacy intersected with a profound crisis of authority and rule on the one hand, and the political economy of radical precarity on the other. Boko Haram and MEND share family resemblances—they are products of the same orderings of power—despite the obvious fact that one is draped in the language of religion and restoration (but as we shall see modernity) and the insistence that Nigeria should become transformed into a true Islamic state, while the other is secular and civic (and also modern) wishing to expand the boundaries of citizenship through a new sort of federalism. There are striking commonalities in the social composition of the armed groups and their internal dynamics; each is deposited at the nexus of the failure of local government, customary institutions, and the security forces (the police and the military task forces in particular). Each, nevertheless, is site specific; a cultural articulation of dispossession politics rooted in regional traditions of warfare, in particular systems of religiosity, and very different sorts of social structure and identity, and very different ecologies (the semi arid savannas of the north, and the creeks and forest of the Niger delta). In both cases state coercion and despotism and the ethico-moral decrepitude of the state figures centrally as does the politics of resentment that each condition generates among a large, alienated but geographically rooted group of precarious classes.http://journals.openedition.org/espacepolitique/4336frontiersinsurgencyprecarityterritoryviolenceyouth
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael J Watts
spellingShingle Michael J Watts
Frontiers: Authority, Precarity and Insurgency at the Edge of the State
L'Espace Politique
frontiers
insurgency
precarity
territory
violence
youth
author_facet Michael J Watts
author_sort Michael J Watts
title Frontiers: Authority, Precarity and Insurgency at the Edge of the State
title_short Frontiers: Authority, Precarity and Insurgency at the Edge of the State
title_full Frontiers: Authority, Precarity and Insurgency at the Edge of the State
title_fullStr Frontiers: Authority, Precarity and Insurgency at the Edge of the State
title_full_unstemmed Frontiers: Authority, Precarity and Insurgency at the Edge of the State
title_sort frontiers: authority, precarity and insurgency at the edge of the state
publisher Université de Reims Champagne-Ardennes
series L'Espace Politique
issn 1958-5500
publishDate 2017-09-01
description Two home-grown insurgencies  arose in Nigeria after the return to civilian rule in 1999: Boko Haram in the Muslim northeast, the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND) in the oil producing and Christian southeast. The two insurgencies arose, I argue, from frontier spaces in which the limits of state authority and legitimacy intersected with a profound crisis of authority and rule on the one hand, and the political economy of radical precarity on the other. Boko Haram and MEND share family resemblances—they are products of the same orderings of power—despite the obvious fact that one is draped in the language of religion and restoration (but as we shall see modernity) and the insistence that Nigeria should become transformed into a true Islamic state, while the other is secular and civic (and also modern) wishing to expand the boundaries of citizenship through a new sort of federalism. There are striking commonalities in the social composition of the armed groups and their internal dynamics; each is deposited at the nexus of the failure of local government, customary institutions, and the security forces (the police and the military task forces in particular). Each, nevertheless, is site specific; a cultural articulation of dispossession politics rooted in regional traditions of warfare, in particular systems of religiosity, and very different sorts of social structure and identity, and very different ecologies (the semi arid savannas of the north, and the creeks and forest of the Niger delta). In both cases state coercion and despotism and the ethico-moral decrepitude of the state figures centrally as does the politics of resentment that each condition generates among a large, alienated but geographically rooted group of precarious classes.
topic frontiers
insurgency
precarity
territory
violence
youth
url http://journals.openedition.org/espacepolitique/4336
work_keys_str_mv AT michaeljwatts frontiersauthorityprecarityandinsurgencyattheedgeofthestate
_version_ 1725620523877007360