Science Fiction, Ecological Futures, and the Topography of Fritz Lang’s Metropolis

Since 1927, Fritz Lang’s Metropolis has circulated as stills, clips, and a sequence ofincreasingly more complete cuts in the global social imaginary. Whilst scholars havecritiqued this science fiction film from gender, techno-culture, and German sociopoliticalperspectives, this article analyzes the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andrew Hageman
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: European Association for the Study of Literature, Culture and the Environment; Universidad de Alcalá de Henares 2012-01-01
Series:Ecozon@
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecozona.eu/index.php/journal/article/view/280/607
id doaj-88822ba264f646238fc941ae4b5cc9c5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-88822ba264f646238fc941ae4b5cc9c52020-11-25T01:59:24ZdeuEuropean Association for the Study of Literature, Culture and the Environment; Universidad de Alcalá de HenaresEcozon@2171-95942012-01-01325773Science Fiction, Ecological Futures, and the Topography of Fritz Lang’s MetropolisAndrew HagemanSince 1927, Fritz Lang’s Metropolis has circulated as stills, clips, and a sequence ofincreasingly more complete cuts in the global social imaginary. Whilst scholars havecritiqued this science fiction film from gender, techno-culture, and German sociopoliticalperspectives, this article analyzes the film afresh by reading it ecocritically. Thearticle moves through three key components of Metropolis. The first movementexamines the representational and ideological contradictions within the variety ofmachines inside the diegetic city to deconstruct the common interpretation of the film’smachines as dehumanizing and alienating people from a “natural” world. The secondmovement reads the film’s urban topography, dwelling particularly on Rotwang’s houseas indigestible history and the Club of the Sons as “nature”-themed fantasy place. Third,the article analyzes what I am calling the film’s “organ dialectic” of antithetical hand andhead sublated in the heart to show how this metaphor structure complicates not onlythe film’s conclusion but also common ecological epistemological and ontologicaltheories that invoke the organic and the mechanic. Ultimately, the article assemblesthese three analytical components to argue that contradictions within the narrative,representational, and rhetorical structures of Metropolis illuminate crucial ideologicalchallenges of thinking ecology and technology together, whether in 1927 or today.http://www.ecozona.eu/index.php/journal/article/view/280/607Science-fictionTechno-cultureEcocinemaMachinesUrban EcologyTopography.
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrew Hageman
spellingShingle Andrew Hageman
Science Fiction, Ecological Futures, and the Topography of Fritz Lang’s Metropolis
Ecozon@
Science-fiction
Techno-culture
Ecocinema
Machines
Urban Ecology
Topography.
author_facet Andrew Hageman
author_sort Andrew Hageman
title Science Fiction, Ecological Futures, and the Topography of Fritz Lang’s Metropolis
title_short Science Fiction, Ecological Futures, and the Topography of Fritz Lang’s Metropolis
title_full Science Fiction, Ecological Futures, and the Topography of Fritz Lang’s Metropolis
title_fullStr Science Fiction, Ecological Futures, and the Topography of Fritz Lang’s Metropolis
title_full_unstemmed Science Fiction, Ecological Futures, and the Topography of Fritz Lang’s Metropolis
title_sort science fiction, ecological futures, and the topography of fritz lang’s metropolis
publisher European Association for the Study of Literature, Culture and the Environment; Universidad de Alcalá de Henares
series Ecozon@
issn 2171-9594
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Since 1927, Fritz Lang’s Metropolis has circulated as stills, clips, and a sequence ofincreasingly more complete cuts in the global social imaginary. Whilst scholars havecritiqued this science fiction film from gender, techno-culture, and German sociopoliticalperspectives, this article analyzes the film afresh by reading it ecocritically. Thearticle moves through three key components of Metropolis. The first movementexamines the representational and ideological contradictions within the variety ofmachines inside the diegetic city to deconstruct the common interpretation of the film’smachines as dehumanizing and alienating people from a “natural” world. The secondmovement reads the film’s urban topography, dwelling particularly on Rotwang’s houseas indigestible history and the Club of the Sons as “nature”-themed fantasy place. Third,the article analyzes what I am calling the film’s “organ dialectic” of antithetical hand andhead sublated in the heart to show how this metaphor structure complicates not onlythe film’s conclusion but also common ecological epistemological and ontologicaltheories that invoke the organic and the mechanic. Ultimately, the article assemblesthese three analytical components to argue that contradictions within the narrative,representational, and rhetorical structures of Metropolis illuminate crucial ideologicalchallenges of thinking ecology and technology together, whether in 1927 or today.
topic Science-fiction
Techno-culture
Ecocinema
Machines
Urban Ecology
Topography.
url http://www.ecozona.eu/index.php/journal/article/view/280/607
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewhageman sciencefictionecologicalfuturesandthetopographyoffritzlangsmetropolis
_version_ 1724964809401696256