Is post mydriatic test necessary in children having compound myopic astigmatism?
Purpose: To study the need of post mydriatic test (PMT) in children with mild to moderate compound myopic astigmatism. Materials and Methods: The children having mild to moderate compound myopic astigmatism presenting to the pediatric ophthalmology department underwent subjective refraction before,...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2015-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jcor.in/article.asp?issn=2320-3897;year=2015;volume=3;issue=2;spage=77;epage=79;aulast=Kothari |
id |
doaj-88bd8475142a4f4382282f2c464e1da9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-88bd8475142a4f4382282f2c464e1da92020-11-25T00:06:36ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research2320-38972015-01-0132777910.4103/2320-3897.156587Is post mydriatic test necessary in children having compound myopic astigmatism?Mihir KothariAli HussainPurpose: To study the need of post mydriatic test (PMT) in children with mild to moderate compound myopic astigmatism. Materials and Methods: The children having mild to moderate compound myopic astigmatism presenting to the pediatric ophthalmology department underwent subjective refraction before, immediately after cycloplegia and 3 days after cycloplegia. The refractive error was analyzed using two-tailed paired t test by dividing the refractive-errors into sphere, cylinder and axis. Spherical equivalent was analyzed separately. Result: Eighty four eyes of 42 children aged 3 to16 years (Mean 9.6, SD 3.2) were included. Mean sphere was -0.9 diopter sphere (DS) (± 1.9) without cycloplegia and -0.4 DS (± 2.0) with cycloplegia compared to -0.9 DS (± 1.8) in the PMT. Mean cylinder was -1.3 diopter cylinder (DC) (± 1.2) without cycloplegia and -1.0 DC (± 1.5) with cycloplegia compared to -1.14 DC (± 1.3) in PMT. Mean spherical equivalent was -1.5 DS (± 1.6) without cycloplegia and -0.9 DS (± 1.8) with cycloplegia compared to -1.5 DS (± 1.6) in PMT. For spherical equivalent, the correlation coefficient (r) between non-cycloplegic refraction and cycloplegic refraction; non-cycloplegic refraction and PMT; cycloplegic refraction and PMT was 0.9. However, in comparison to cycloplegic refraction, PMT was closer to non-cycloplegic refraction and differed by only 0.01 DS (± 0.9) in sphere and 0.2 D (± 0.7) in cylinder. Conclusion: PMT is not warranted in children with compound myopic astigmatism.http://www.jcor.in/article.asp?issn=2320-3897;year=2015;volume=3;issue=2;spage=77;epage=79;aulast=KothariAutorefractioncycloplegic refractionpost mydriatic testrefraction in childrensubjective refraction |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mihir Kothari Ali Hussain |
spellingShingle |
Mihir Kothari Ali Hussain Is post mydriatic test necessary in children having compound myopic astigmatism? Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research Autorefraction cycloplegic refraction post mydriatic test refraction in children subjective refraction |
author_facet |
Mihir Kothari Ali Hussain |
author_sort |
Mihir Kothari |
title |
Is post mydriatic test necessary in children having compound myopic astigmatism? |
title_short |
Is post mydriatic test necessary in children having compound myopic astigmatism? |
title_full |
Is post mydriatic test necessary in children having compound myopic astigmatism? |
title_fullStr |
Is post mydriatic test necessary in children having compound myopic astigmatism? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is post mydriatic test necessary in children having compound myopic astigmatism? |
title_sort |
is post mydriatic test necessary in children having compound myopic astigmatism? |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research |
issn |
2320-3897 |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
Purpose: To study the need of post mydriatic test (PMT) in children with mild to moderate compound myopic astigmatism. Materials and Methods: The children having mild to moderate compound myopic astigmatism presenting to the pediatric ophthalmology department underwent subjective refraction before, immediately after cycloplegia and 3 days after cycloplegia. The refractive error was analyzed using two-tailed paired t test by dividing the refractive-errors into sphere, cylinder and axis. Spherical equivalent was analyzed separately. Result: Eighty four eyes of 42 children aged 3 to16 years (Mean 9.6, SD 3.2) were included. Mean sphere was -0.9 diopter sphere (DS) (± 1.9) without cycloplegia and -0.4 DS (± 2.0) with cycloplegia compared to -0.9 DS (± 1.8) in the PMT. Mean cylinder was -1.3 diopter cylinder (DC) (± 1.2) without cycloplegia and -1.0 DC (± 1.5) with cycloplegia compared to -1.14 DC (± 1.3) in PMT. Mean spherical equivalent was -1.5 DS (± 1.6) without cycloplegia and -0.9 DS (± 1.8) with cycloplegia compared to -1.5 DS (± 1.6) in PMT. For spherical equivalent, the correlation coefficient (r) between non-cycloplegic refraction and cycloplegic refraction; non-cycloplegic refraction and PMT; cycloplegic refraction and PMT was 0.9. However, in comparison to cycloplegic refraction, PMT was closer to non-cycloplegic refraction and differed by only 0.01 DS (± 0.9) in sphere and 0.2 D (± 0.7) in cylinder. Conclusion: PMT is not warranted in children with compound myopic astigmatism. |
topic |
Autorefraction cycloplegic refraction post mydriatic test refraction in children subjective refraction |
url |
http://www.jcor.in/article.asp?issn=2320-3897;year=2015;volume=3;issue=2;spage=77;epage=79;aulast=Kothari |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mihirkothari ispostmydriatictestnecessaryinchildrenhavingcompoundmyopicastigmatism AT alihussain ispostmydriatictestnecessaryinchildrenhavingcompoundmyopicastigmatism |
_version_ |
1725421213361111040 |