Do and Think and Play and Show and Tell: Artefacts All the Time

This is a practitioner’s response to Show and tell: Accessing and communicating implicit knowledge through artefacts, a paper by Yoko Akama and her colleagues appearing in this same issue of Artifact. Their findings suggest that people assign their own meanings to physical artefacts. In the author’s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rettig, Marc
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Intellect 2007-09-01
Series:Artifact
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/intellect/ajdp/2007/00000001/00000003/art00007
id doaj-88c18afcd8f04b52890bb8533a7a2599
record_format Article
spelling doaj-88c18afcd8f04b52890bb8533a7a25992020-11-25T00:46:47ZengIntellect Artifact1749-34631749-34712007-09-0113https://doi.org/10.1080/17493460701819462Do and Think and Play and Show and Tell: Artefacts All the TimeRettig, Marc0Fit Associates, Pittsburgh, PA, USAThis is a practitioner’s response to Show and tell: Accessing and communicating implicit knowledge through artefacts, a paper by Yoko Akama and her colleagues appearing in this same issue of Artifact. Their findings suggest that people assign their own meanings to physical artefacts. In the author’s experience, this insight proves useful in industry work. In this paper, that usefulness is illustrated by six stories from projects, describing how the author and his colleagues and have observed and often encouraged this behaviour using indigenous, introduced, and constructed artefacts. Additionally, two theoretical areas are briefly discussed that underpin the methods referenced in the stories. The first theoretical underpinning concerns a distinction drawn from anthropology between the etic or observer’s understanding of an object, and the emic or indigenous person’s understanding. The second is a brief discussion of our somewhat different perspectives concerning a language of artefacts. While Yoko Akama, Roslyn Cooper, Laurene Vaughan, Stephen Viller, Matthew Simpson, and Jeremy Yuille argue that artefacts present their own embedded language, the author suggests a practical understanding of language behaviour that accepts non-verbal, non-textual elements into the lexicon.https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/intellect/ajdp/2007/00000001/00000003/art00007case studiesethnomethodologyinterview methodslanguage and designplayful triggers
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rettig, Marc
spellingShingle Rettig, Marc
Do and Think and Play and Show and Tell: Artefacts All the Time
Artifact
case studies
ethnomethodology
interview methods
language and design
playful triggers
author_facet Rettig, Marc
author_sort Rettig, Marc
title Do and Think and Play and Show and Tell: Artefacts All the Time
title_short Do and Think and Play and Show and Tell: Artefacts All the Time
title_full Do and Think and Play and Show and Tell: Artefacts All the Time
title_fullStr Do and Think and Play and Show and Tell: Artefacts All the Time
title_full_unstemmed Do and Think and Play and Show and Tell: Artefacts All the Time
title_sort do and think and play and show and tell: artefacts all the time
publisher Intellect
series Artifact
issn 1749-3463
1749-3471
publishDate 2007-09-01
description This is a practitioner’s response to Show and tell: Accessing and communicating implicit knowledge through artefacts, a paper by Yoko Akama and her colleagues appearing in this same issue of Artifact. Their findings suggest that people assign their own meanings to physical artefacts. In the author’s experience, this insight proves useful in industry work. In this paper, that usefulness is illustrated by six stories from projects, describing how the author and his colleagues and have observed and often encouraged this behaviour using indigenous, introduced, and constructed artefacts. Additionally, two theoretical areas are briefly discussed that underpin the methods referenced in the stories. The first theoretical underpinning concerns a distinction drawn from anthropology between the etic or observer’s understanding of an object, and the emic or indigenous person’s understanding. The second is a brief discussion of our somewhat different perspectives concerning a language of artefacts. While Yoko Akama, Roslyn Cooper, Laurene Vaughan, Stephen Viller, Matthew Simpson, and Jeremy Yuille argue that artefacts present their own embedded language, the author suggests a practical understanding of language behaviour that accepts non-verbal, non-textual elements into the lexicon.
topic case studies
ethnomethodology
interview methods
language and design
playful triggers
url https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/intellect/ajdp/2007/00000001/00000003/art00007
work_keys_str_mv AT rettigmarc doandthinkandplayandshowandtellartefactsallthetime
_version_ 1725263150820884480