Absence of carious lesions at margins of glass-ionomer cement and amalgam restorations: An update of systematic review evidence
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This article aims to update the existing systematic review evidence elicited by Mickenautsch et al. up to 18 January 2008 (published in the European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry in 2009) and addressing the review question of wheth...
Main Authors: | Yengopal Veerasamy, Mickenautsch Steffen |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2011-03-01
|
Series: | BMC Research Notes |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-0500/4/58 |
Similar Items
-
Do Laboratory Results Concerning High-Viscosity Glass-Ionomers versus Amalgam for Tooth Restorations Indicate Similar Effect Direction and Magnitude than that of Controlled Clinical Trials? - A Meta-Epidemiological Study.
by: Steffen Mickenautsch, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01) -
Caries-preventive effect of glass ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants on permanent teeth: An update of systematic review evidence
by: Yengopal Veerasamy, et al.
Published: (2011-01-01) -
The modified Ottawa method to establish the update need of a systematic review: glass-ionomer versus resin sealants for caries prevention
by: Steffen Mickenautsch, et al.
Published: (2013-09-01) -
Glass ionomer cements and their role in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions
by: Luciana Fávaro Francisconi, et al.
Published: (2009-10-01) -
Direct contra naïve-indirect comparison of clinical failure rates between high-viscosity GIC and conventional amalgam restorations: an empirical study.
by: Steffen Mickenautsch, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01)