Linguistic Justice Requires an Artificial Language: a Comment on van Parijs
In advocating the use of a global auxiliary language, Van Parijs forms part of a tradition that stretches back to the seventeenth century. However, he differs from this tradition in promoting the use of English rather than an artificial language of some sort. This paper examines the theoretical situ...
Main Author: | Maat Jaap |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2016-10-01
|
Series: | Acta Universitatis Sapientiae: European and Regional Studies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/auseur-2016-0011 |
Similar Items
-
Linguistic Justice, van Parijs, and Esperanto
by: Gobbo Federico
Published: (2016-10-01) -
Esperanto as an Auxiliary Language and a Possible Solution to the BRICS Language Dilemma: A Case Study
by: Byelongo Elisee Isheloke
Published: (2019-10-01) -
Introduction: In Search of Esperanto
by: Humphrey Tonkin
Published: (2015-04-01) -
The Teaching and Learning of Esperanto
by: Duncan Charters
Published: (2015-04-01) -
Multilingualism and Social Inclusion
by: László Marácz, et al.
Published: (2017-12-01)