Harnessing the power of eDNA metabarcoding for the detection of deep-sea fishes.

The deep ocean is the largest biome on Earth and faces increasing anthropogenic pressures from climate change and commercial fisheries. Our ability to sustainably manage this expansive habitat is impeded by our poor understanding of its inhabitants and by the difficulties in surveying and monitoring...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beverly McClenaghan, Nicole Fahner, David Cote, Julek Chawarski, Avery McCarthy, Hoda Rajabi, Greg Singer, Mehrdad Hajibabaei
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236540
id doaj-89594f2500624cf5aab2c735eb202c3f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-89594f2500624cf5aab2c735eb202c3f2021-03-04T11:52:48ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-011511e023654010.1371/journal.pone.0236540Harnessing the power of eDNA metabarcoding for the detection of deep-sea fishes.Beverly McClenaghanNicole FahnerDavid CoteJulek ChawarskiAvery McCarthyHoda RajabiGreg SingerMehrdad HajibabaeiThe deep ocean is the largest biome on Earth and faces increasing anthropogenic pressures from climate change and commercial fisheries. Our ability to sustainably manage this expansive habitat is impeded by our poor understanding of its inhabitants and by the difficulties in surveying and monitoring these areas. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has great potential to improve our understanding of this region and to facilitate monitoring across a broad range of taxa. Here, we evaluate two eDNA sampling protocols and seven primer sets for elucidating fish diversity from deep sea water samples. We found that deep sea water samples (> 1400 m depth) had significantly lower DNA concentrations than surface or mid-depth samples necessitating a refined protocol with a larger sampling volume. We recovered significantly more DNA in large volume water samples (1.5 L) filtered at sea compared to small volume samples (250 mL) held for lab filtration. Furthermore, the number of unique sequences (exact sequence variants; ESVs) recovered per sample was higher in large volume samples. Since the number of ESVs recovered from large volume samples was less variable and consistently high, we recommend the larger volumes when sampling water from the deep ocean. We also identified three primer sets which detected the most fish taxa but recommend using multiple markers due the variability in detection probabilities and taxonomic resolution among fishes for each primer set. Overall, fish diversity results obtained from metabarcoding were comparable to conventional survey methods. While eDNA sampling and processing need be optimized for this unique environment, the results of this study demonstrate that eDNA metabarcoding can facilitate biodiversity surveys in the deep ocean, require less dedicated survey effort per unit identification, and are capable of simultaneously providing valuable information on other taxonomic groups.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236540
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Beverly McClenaghan
Nicole Fahner
David Cote
Julek Chawarski
Avery McCarthy
Hoda Rajabi
Greg Singer
Mehrdad Hajibabaei
spellingShingle Beverly McClenaghan
Nicole Fahner
David Cote
Julek Chawarski
Avery McCarthy
Hoda Rajabi
Greg Singer
Mehrdad Hajibabaei
Harnessing the power of eDNA metabarcoding for the detection of deep-sea fishes.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Beverly McClenaghan
Nicole Fahner
David Cote
Julek Chawarski
Avery McCarthy
Hoda Rajabi
Greg Singer
Mehrdad Hajibabaei
author_sort Beverly McClenaghan
title Harnessing the power of eDNA metabarcoding for the detection of deep-sea fishes.
title_short Harnessing the power of eDNA metabarcoding for the detection of deep-sea fishes.
title_full Harnessing the power of eDNA metabarcoding for the detection of deep-sea fishes.
title_fullStr Harnessing the power of eDNA metabarcoding for the detection of deep-sea fishes.
title_full_unstemmed Harnessing the power of eDNA metabarcoding for the detection of deep-sea fishes.
title_sort harnessing the power of edna metabarcoding for the detection of deep-sea fishes.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description The deep ocean is the largest biome on Earth and faces increasing anthropogenic pressures from climate change and commercial fisheries. Our ability to sustainably manage this expansive habitat is impeded by our poor understanding of its inhabitants and by the difficulties in surveying and monitoring these areas. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has great potential to improve our understanding of this region and to facilitate monitoring across a broad range of taxa. Here, we evaluate two eDNA sampling protocols and seven primer sets for elucidating fish diversity from deep sea water samples. We found that deep sea water samples (> 1400 m depth) had significantly lower DNA concentrations than surface or mid-depth samples necessitating a refined protocol with a larger sampling volume. We recovered significantly more DNA in large volume water samples (1.5 L) filtered at sea compared to small volume samples (250 mL) held for lab filtration. Furthermore, the number of unique sequences (exact sequence variants; ESVs) recovered per sample was higher in large volume samples. Since the number of ESVs recovered from large volume samples was less variable and consistently high, we recommend the larger volumes when sampling water from the deep ocean. We also identified three primer sets which detected the most fish taxa but recommend using multiple markers due the variability in detection probabilities and taxonomic resolution among fishes for each primer set. Overall, fish diversity results obtained from metabarcoding were comparable to conventional survey methods. While eDNA sampling and processing need be optimized for this unique environment, the results of this study demonstrate that eDNA metabarcoding can facilitate biodiversity surveys in the deep ocean, require less dedicated survey effort per unit identification, and are capable of simultaneously providing valuable information on other taxonomic groups.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236540
work_keys_str_mv AT beverlymcclenaghan harnessingthepowerofednametabarcodingforthedetectionofdeepseafishes
AT nicolefahner harnessingthepowerofednametabarcodingforthedetectionofdeepseafishes
AT davidcote harnessingthepowerofednametabarcodingforthedetectionofdeepseafishes
AT julekchawarski harnessingthepowerofednametabarcodingforthedetectionofdeepseafishes
AT averymccarthy harnessingthepowerofednametabarcodingforthedetectionofdeepseafishes
AT hodarajabi harnessingthepowerofednametabarcodingforthedetectionofdeepseafishes
AT gregsinger harnessingthepowerofednametabarcodingforthedetectionofdeepseafishes
AT mehrdadhajibabaei harnessingthepowerofednametabarcodingforthedetectionofdeepseafishes
_version_ 1714803337131458560