Harnessing the power of eDNA metabarcoding for the detection of deep-sea fishes.
The deep ocean is the largest biome on Earth and faces increasing anthropogenic pressures from climate change and commercial fisheries. Our ability to sustainably manage this expansive habitat is impeded by our poor understanding of its inhabitants and by the difficulties in surveying and monitoring...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236540 |
id |
doaj-89594f2500624cf5aab2c735eb202c3f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-89594f2500624cf5aab2c735eb202c3f2021-03-04T11:52:48ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-011511e023654010.1371/journal.pone.0236540Harnessing the power of eDNA metabarcoding for the detection of deep-sea fishes.Beverly McClenaghanNicole FahnerDavid CoteJulek ChawarskiAvery McCarthyHoda RajabiGreg SingerMehrdad HajibabaeiThe deep ocean is the largest biome on Earth and faces increasing anthropogenic pressures from climate change and commercial fisheries. Our ability to sustainably manage this expansive habitat is impeded by our poor understanding of its inhabitants and by the difficulties in surveying and monitoring these areas. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has great potential to improve our understanding of this region and to facilitate monitoring across a broad range of taxa. Here, we evaluate two eDNA sampling protocols and seven primer sets for elucidating fish diversity from deep sea water samples. We found that deep sea water samples (> 1400 m depth) had significantly lower DNA concentrations than surface or mid-depth samples necessitating a refined protocol with a larger sampling volume. We recovered significantly more DNA in large volume water samples (1.5 L) filtered at sea compared to small volume samples (250 mL) held for lab filtration. Furthermore, the number of unique sequences (exact sequence variants; ESVs) recovered per sample was higher in large volume samples. Since the number of ESVs recovered from large volume samples was less variable and consistently high, we recommend the larger volumes when sampling water from the deep ocean. We also identified three primer sets which detected the most fish taxa but recommend using multiple markers due the variability in detection probabilities and taxonomic resolution among fishes for each primer set. Overall, fish diversity results obtained from metabarcoding were comparable to conventional survey methods. While eDNA sampling and processing need be optimized for this unique environment, the results of this study demonstrate that eDNA metabarcoding can facilitate biodiversity surveys in the deep ocean, require less dedicated survey effort per unit identification, and are capable of simultaneously providing valuable information on other taxonomic groups.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236540 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Beverly McClenaghan Nicole Fahner David Cote Julek Chawarski Avery McCarthy Hoda Rajabi Greg Singer Mehrdad Hajibabaei |
spellingShingle |
Beverly McClenaghan Nicole Fahner David Cote Julek Chawarski Avery McCarthy Hoda Rajabi Greg Singer Mehrdad Hajibabaei Harnessing the power of eDNA metabarcoding for the detection of deep-sea fishes. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Beverly McClenaghan Nicole Fahner David Cote Julek Chawarski Avery McCarthy Hoda Rajabi Greg Singer Mehrdad Hajibabaei |
author_sort |
Beverly McClenaghan |
title |
Harnessing the power of eDNA metabarcoding for the detection of deep-sea fishes. |
title_short |
Harnessing the power of eDNA metabarcoding for the detection of deep-sea fishes. |
title_full |
Harnessing the power of eDNA metabarcoding for the detection of deep-sea fishes. |
title_fullStr |
Harnessing the power of eDNA metabarcoding for the detection of deep-sea fishes. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Harnessing the power of eDNA metabarcoding for the detection of deep-sea fishes. |
title_sort |
harnessing the power of edna metabarcoding for the detection of deep-sea fishes. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
The deep ocean is the largest biome on Earth and faces increasing anthropogenic pressures from climate change and commercial fisheries. Our ability to sustainably manage this expansive habitat is impeded by our poor understanding of its inhabitants and by the difficulties in surveying and monitoring these areas. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has great potential to improve our understanding of this region and to facilitate monitoring across a broad range of taxa. Here, we evaluate two eDNA sampling protocols and seven primer sets for elucidating fish diversity from deep sea water samples. We found that deep sea water samples (> 1400 m depth) had significantly lower DNA concentrations than surface or mid-depth samples necessitating a refined protocol with a larger sampling volume. We recovered significantly more DNA in large volume water samples (1.5 L) filtered at sea compared to small volume samples (250 mL) held for lab filtration. Furthermore, the number of unique sequences (exact sequence variants; ESVs) recovered per sample was higher in large volume samples. Since the number of ESVs recovered from large volume samples was less variable and consistently high, we recommend the larger volumes when sampling water from the deep ocean. We also identified three primer sets which detected the most fish taxa but recommend using multiple markers due the variability in detection probabilities and taxonomic resolution among fishes for each primer set. Overall, fish diversity results obtained from metabarcoding were comparable to conventional survey methods. While eDNA sampling and processing need be optimized for this unique environment, the results of this study demonstrate that eDNA metabarcoding can facilitate biodiversity surveys in the deep ocean, require less dedicated survey effort per unit identification, and are capable of simultaneously providing valuable information on other taxonomic groups. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236540 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT beverlymcclenaghan harnessingthepowerofednametabarcodingforthedetectionofdeepseafishes AT nicolefahner harnessingthepowerofednametabarcodingforthedetectionofdeepseafishes AT davidcote harnessingthepowerofednametabarcodingforthedetectionofdeepseafishes AT julekchawarski harnessingthepowerofednametabarcodingforthedetectionofdeepseafishes AT averymccarthy harnessingthepowerofednametabarcodingforthedetectionofdeepseafishes AT hodarajabi harnessingthepowerofednametabarcodingforthedetectionofdeepseafishes AT gregsinger harnessingthepowerofednametabarcodingforthedetectionofdeepseafishes AT mehrdadhajibabaei harnessingthepowerofednametabarcodingforthedetectionofdeepseafishes |
_version_ |
1714803337131458560 |