PRACTICE OF PRESCRIBING BETA-BLOCKERS AND ITS COMPLIANCE WITH CLINICAL GUIDELINES ACCORDING TO TWO REGISTERS OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES

• Main Authors: S. Yu. Martsevich, N. A. Zakharova, N. P. Kutishenko, A. V. Zagrebelnyy, A. V. Zakharova, M. M. Loukianov, A. N. Vorobyev, K. A. Moseichuk, A. N. Kozminsky
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Stolichnaya Izdatelskaya Kompaniya 2016-06-01
• Series: Racionalʹnaâ Farmakoterapiâ v Kardiologii
• Subjects: beta-blockers; register; practice of prescribing beta-blocker
• Online Access: https://www.rpcardio.com/jour/article/view/1266
• ISSN: 1819-6446; 2225-3653

Aim. To assess real clinical practice of prescribing beta-blockers (BB) and its compliance with updated guidelines, using data from outpatient registers that are carried out in medical institutions of different levels. Material and methods. We analyzed data from two outpatient registries - RECVASA and PROFILE. RECVASA register included patients aged ≥18 years with arterial hypertension (HT), ischemic heart disease (IHD), chronic heart failure (CHF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) that consulted in 3 outpatient clinics of Ryazan city in 2012-2013 (n=3690). PROFILE register included patients aged ≥18 years with HT, IHD, CHF, AF that consulted in specialized cardiac unit of the State Research Center for Preventive Medicine in 2011-2015 (n=1531). Results. There were differences in the basic characteristics of the registers: in the RECVASA register average age of patients was higher, HT, IHD and CHF were more frequent; PROFILE register included more patients with the history of myocardial infarction. In the RECVASA register 41.5% (n=1533) of patients received BB, and in the PROFILE register – 47.7% (n=731). The most frequently prescribed BB was bisoprolol in all cardiovascular diseases. Conclusion. In a specialized medical institution BB used more often under the conditions where they are necessary. The choice of a specific BB inside the pharmacological group, even in a specialized medical institution does not always correspond to clinical guidelines and evidence-based medicine.