Reuse of structural domain–domain interactions in protein networks

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Protein interactions are thought to be largely mediated by interactions between structural domains. Databases such as <it>i</it>Pfam relate interactions in protein structures to known domain families. Here, we investigate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bateman Alex, Schuster-Böckler Benjamin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2007-07-01
Series:BMC Bioinformatics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/8/259
id doaj-8962a8cd9fa24983951b99f95ea8f5f8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8962a8cd9fa24983951b99f95ea8f5f82020-11-25T00:15:21ZengBMCBMC Bioinformatics1471-21052007-07-018125910.1186/1471-2105-8-259Reuse of structural domain–domain interactions in protein networksBateman AlexSchuster-Böckler Benjamin<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Protein interactions are thought to be largely mediated by interactions between structural domains. Databases such as <it>i</it>Pfam relate interactions in protein structures to known domain families. Here, we investigate how the domain interactions from the <it>i</it>Pfam database are distributed in protein interactions taken from the HPRD, MPact, BioGRID, DIP and IntAct databases.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We find that known structural domain interactions can only explain a subset of 4–19% of the available protein interactions, nevertheless this fraction is still significantly bigger than expected by chance. There is a correlation between the frequency of a domain interaction and the connectivity of the proteins it occurs in. Furthermore, a large proportion of protein interactions can be attributed to a small number of domain interactions. We conclude that many, but not all, domain interactions constitute reusable modules of molecular recognition. A substantial proportion of domain interactions are conserved between <it>E. coli</it>, <it>S. cerevisiae </it>and <it>H. sapiens</it>. These domains are related to essential cellular functions, suggesting that many domain interactions were already present in the last universal common ancestor.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our results support the concept of domain interactions as reusable, conserved building blocks of protein interactions, but also highlight the limitations currently imposed by the small number of available protein structures.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/8/259
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bateman Alex
Schuster-Böckler Benjamin
spellingShingle Bateman Alex
Schuster-Böckler Benjamin
Reuse of structural domain–domain interactions in protein networks
BMC Bioinformatics
author_facet Bateman Alex
Schuster-Böckler Benjamin
author_sort Bateman Alex
title Reuse of structural domain–domain interactions in protein networks
title_short Reuse of structural domain–domain interactions in protein networks
title_full Reuse of structural domain–domain interactions in protein networks
title_fullStr Reuse of structural domain–domain interactions in protein networks
title_full_unstemmed Reuse of structural domain–domain interactions in protein networks
title_sort reuse of structural domain–domain interactions in protein networks
publisher BMC
series BMC Bioinformatics
issn 1471-2105
publishDate 2007-07-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Protein interactions are thought to be largely mediated by interactions between structural domains. Databases such as <it>i</it>Pfam relate interactions in protein structures to known domain families. Here, we investigate how the domain interactions from the <it>i</it>Pfam database are distributed in protein interactions taken from the HPRD, MPact, BioGRID, DIP and IntAct databases.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We find that known structural domain interactions can only explain a subset of 4–19% of the available protein interactions, nevertheless this fraction is still significantly bigger than expected by chance. There is a correlation between the frequency of a domain interaction and the connectivity of the proteins it occurs in. Furthermore, a large proportion of protein interactions can be attributed to a small number of domain interactions. We conclude that many, but not all, domain interactions constitute reusable modules of molecular recognition. A substantial proportion of domain interactions are conserved between <it>E. coli</it>, <it>S. cerevisiae </it>and <it>H. sapiens</it>. These domains are related to essential cellular functions, suggesting that many domain interactions were already present in the last universal common ancestor.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our results support the concept of domain interactions as reusable, conserved building blocks of protein interactions, but also highlight the limitations currently imposed by the small number of available protein structures.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/8/259
work_keys_str_mv AT batemanalex reuseofstructuraldomaindomaininteractionsinproteinnetworks
AT schusterbocklerbenjamin reuseofstructuraldomaindomaininteractionsinproteinnetworks
_version_ 1725387302000132096