Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement
Abstract This is a condensed summary of an international multisociety statement on ethics of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology produced by the ACR, European Society of Radiology, RSNA, Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine, European Society of Medical Imaging Informatics, Canadian Asso...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2019-10-01
|
Series: | Insights into Imaging |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13244-019-0785-8 |
id |
doaj-8969213fbb274624a5151220245d35f6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8969213fbb274624a5151220245d35f62020-11-25T03:40:00ZengSpringerOpenInsights into Imaging1869-41012019-10-011011610.1186/s13244-019-0785-8Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statementJ. Raymond Geis0Adrian Brady1Carol C. Wu2Jack Spencer3Erik Ranschaert4Jacob L. Jaremko5Steve G. Langer6Andrea Borondy Kitts7Judy Birch8William F. Shields9Robert van den Hoven van Genderen10Elmar Kotter11Judy Wawira Gichoya12Tessa S. Cook13Matthew B. Morgan14An Tang15Nabile M. Safdar16Marc Kohli17American College of Radiology Data Science InstituteMercy University HospitalUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterDepartment of Linguistics and Philosophy, MITNetherlands Cancer InstituteDepartment of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of AlbertaRadiology Department-Mayo ClinicLahey Hospital & Medical CenterPelvic Pain Support NetworkGeneral Counsel, American College of RadiologyCenter of Law and Internet, Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamDepartment of Radiology, University Medical CenterDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Oregon Health & Science UniversityDepartment of Radiology, University of PennsylvaniaDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of UtahCentre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de L’Université de MontréalDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory UniversityDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, UCSFAbstract This is a condensed summary of an international multisociety statement on ethics of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology produced by the ACR, European Society of Radiology, RSNA, Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine, European Society of Medical Imaging Informatics, Canadian Association of Radiologists, and American Association of Physicists in Medicine. AI has great potential to increase efficiency and accuracy throughout radiology, but also carries inherent pitfalls and biases. Widespread use of AI-based intelligent and autonomous systems in radiology can increase the risk of systemic errors with high consequence, and highlights complex ethical and societal issues. Currently, there is little experience using AI for patient care in diverse clinical settings. Extensive research is needed to understand how to best deploy AI in clinical practice. This statement highlights our consensus that ethical use of AI in radiology should promote well-being, minimize harm, and ensure that the benefits and harms are distributed among stakeholders in a just manner. We believe AI should respect human rights and freedoms, including dignity and privacy. It should be designed for maximum transparency and dependability. Ultimate responsibility and accountability for AI remains with its human designers and operators for the foreseeable future. The radiology community should start now to develop codes of ethics and practice for AI which promote any use that helps patients and the common good and should block use of radiology data and algorithms for financial gain without those two attributes.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13244-019-0785-8EthicsArtificial IntelligenceRadiologyMachine LearningData |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
J. Raymond Geis Adrian Brady Carol C. Wu Jack Spencer Erik Ranschaert Jacob L. Jaremko Steve G. Langer Andrea Borondy Kitts Judy Birch William F. Shields Robert van den Hoven van Genderen Elmar Kotter Judy Wawira Gichoya Tessa S. Cook Matthew B. Morgan An Tang Nabile M. Safdar Marc Kohli |
spellingShingle |
J. Raymond Geis Adrian Brady Carol C. Wu Jack Spencer Erik Ranschaert Jacob L. Jaremko Steve G. Langer Andrea Borondy Kitts Judy Birch William F. Shields Robert van den Hoven van Genderen Elmar Kotter Judy Wawira Gichoya Tessa S. Cook Matthew B. Morgan An Tang Nabile M. Safdar Marc Kohli Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement Insights into Imaging Ethics Artificial Intelligence Radiology Machine Learning Data |
author_facet |
J. Raymond Geis Adrian Brady Carol C. Wu Jack Spencer Erik Ranschaert Jacob L. Jaremko Steve G. Langer Andrea Borondy Kitts Judy Birch William F. Shields Robert van den Hoven van Genderen Elmar Kotter Judy Wawira Gichoya Tessa S. Cook Matthew B. Morgan An Tang Nabile M. Safdar Marc Kohli |
author_sort |
J. Raymond Geis |
title |
Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement |
title_short |
Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement |
title_full |
Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement |
title_fullStr |
Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement |
title_sort |
ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint european and north american multisociety statement |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
Insights into Imaging |
issn |
1869-4101 |
publishDate |
2019-10-01 |
description |
Abstract This is a condensed summary of an international multisociety statement on ethics of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology produced by the ACR, European Society of Radiology, RSNA, Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine, European Society of Medical Imaging Informatics, Canadian Association of Radiologists, and American Association of Physicists in Medicine. AI has great potential to increase efficiency and accuracy throughout radiology, but also carries inherent pitfalls and biases. Widespread use of AI-based intelligent and autonomous systems in radiology can increase the risk of systemic errors with high consequence, and highlights complex ethical and societal issues. Currently, there is little experience using AI for patient care in diverse clinical settings. Extensive research is needed to understand how to best deploy AI in clinical practice. This statement highlights our consensus that ethical use of AI in radiology should promote well-being, minimize harm, and ensure that the benefits and harms are distributed among stakeholders in a just manner. We believe AI should respect human rights and freedoms, including dignity and privacy. It should be designed for maximum transparency and dependability. Ultimate responsibility and accountability for AI remains with its human designers and operators for the foreseeable future. The radiology community should start now to develop codes of ethics and practice for AI which promote any use that helps patients and the common good and should block use of radiology data and algorithms for financial gain without those two attributes. |
topic |
Ethics Artificial Intelligence Radiology Machine Learning Data |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13244-019-0785-8 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jraymondgeis ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement AT adrianbrady ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement AT carolcwu ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement AT jackspencer ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement AT erikranschaert ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement AT jacobljaremko ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement AT steveglanger ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement AT andreaborondykitts ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement AT judybirch ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement AT williamfshields ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement AT robertvandenhovenvangenderen ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement AT elmarkotter ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement AT judywawiragichoya ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement AT tessascook ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement AT matthewbmorgan ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement AT antang ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement AT nabilemsafdar ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement AT marckohli ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement |
_version_ |
1724537008859119616 |