Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement

Abstract This is a condensed summary of an international multisociety statement on ethics of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology produced by the ACR, European Society of Radiology, RSNA, Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine, European Society of Medical Imaging Informatics, Canadian Asso...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Raymond Geis, Adrian Brady, Carol C. Wu, Jack Spencer, Erik Ranschaert, Jacob L. Jaremko, Steve G. Langer, Andrea Borondy Kitts, Judy Birch, William F. Shields, Robert van den Hoven van Genderen, Elmar Kotter, Judy Wawira Gichoya, Tessa S. Cook, Matthew B. Morgan, An Tang, Nabile M. Safdar, Marc Kohli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2019-10-01
Series:Insights into Imaging
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13244-019-0785-8
id doaj-8969213fbb274624a5151220245d35f6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8969213fbb274624a5151220245d35f62020-11-25T03:40:00ZengSpringerOpenInsights into Imaging1869-41012019-10-011011610.1186/s13244-019-0785-8Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statementJ. Raymond Geis0Adrian Brady1Carol C. Wu2Jack Spencer3Erik Ranschaert4Jacob L. Jaremko5Steve G. Langer6Andrea Borondy Kitts7Judy Birch8William F. Shields9Robert van den Hoven van Genderen10Elmar Kotter11Judy Wawira Gichoya12Tessa S. Cook13Matthew B. Morgan14An Tang15Nabile M. Safdar16Marc Kohli17American College of Radiology Data Science InstituteMercy University HospitalUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterDepartment of Linguistics and Philosophy, MITNetherlands Cancer InstituteDepartment of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of AlbertaRadiology Department-Mayo ClinicLahey Hospital & Medical CenterPelvic Pain Support NetworkGeneral Counsel, American College of RadiologyCenter of Law and Internet, Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamDepartment of Radiology, University Medical CenterDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Oregon Health & Science UniversityDepartment of Radiology, University of PennsylvaniaDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of UtahCentre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de L’Université de MontréalDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory UniversityDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, UCSFAbstract This is a condensed summary of an international multisociety statement on ethics of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology produced by the ACR, European Society of Radiology, RSNA, Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine, European Society of Medical Imaging Informatics, Canadian Association of Radiologists, and American Association of Physicists in Medicine. AI has great potential to increase efficiency and accuracy throughout radiology, but also carries inherent pitfalls and biases. Widespread use of AI-based intelligent and autonomous systems in radiology can increase the risk of systemic errors with high consequence, and highlights complex ethical and societal issues. Currently, there is little experience using AI for patient care in diverse clinical settings. Extensive research is needed to understand how to best deploy AI in clinical practice. This statement highlights our consensus that ethical use of AI in radiology should promote well-being, minimize harm, and ensure that the benefits and harms are distributed among stakeholders in a just manner. We believe AI should respect human rights and freedoms, including dignity and privacy. It should be designed for maximum transparency and dependability. Ultimate responsibility and accountability for AI remains with its human designers and operators for the foreseeable future. The radiology community should start now to develop codes of ethics and practice for AI which promote any use that helps patients and the common good and should block use of radiology data and algorithms for financial gain without those two attributes.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13244-019-0785-8EthicsArtificial IntelligenceRadiologyMachine LearningData
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. Raymond Geis
Adrian Brady
Carol C. Wu
Jack Spencer
Erik Ranschaert
Jacob L. Jaremko
Steve G. Langer
Andrea Borondy Kitts
Judy Birch
William F. Shields
Robert van den Hoven van Genderen
Elmar Kotter
Judy Wawira Gichoya
Tessa S. Cook
Matthew B. Morgan
An Tang
Nabile M. Safdar
Marc Kohli
spellingShingle J. Raymond Geis
Adrian Brady
Carol C. Wu
Jack Spencer
Erik Ranschaert
Jacob L. Jaremko
Steve G. Langer
Andrea Borondy Kitts
Judy Birch
William F. Shields
Robert van den Hoven van Genderen
Elmar Kotter
Judy Wawira Gichoya
Tessa S. Cook
Matthew B. Morgan
An Tang
Nabile M. Safdar
Marc Kohli
Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement
Insights into Imaging
Ethics
Artificial Intelligence
Radiology
Machine Learning
Data
author_facet J. Raymond Geis
Adrian Brady
Carol C. Wu
Jack Spencer
Erik Ranschaert
Jacob L. Jaremko
Steve G. Langer
Andrea Borondy Kitts
Judy Birch
William F. Shields
Robert van den Hoven van Genderen
Elmar Kotter
Judy Wawira Gichoya
Tessa S. Cook
Matthew B. Morgan
An Tang
Nabile M. Safdar
Marc Kohli
author_sort J. Raymond Geis
title Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement
title_short Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement
title_full Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement
title_fullStr Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement
title_full_unstemmed Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement
title_sort ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint european and north american multisociety statement
publisher SpringerOpen
series Insights into Imaging
issn 1869-4101
publishDate 2019-10-01
description Abstract This is a condensed summary of an international multisociety statement on ethics of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology produced by the ACR, European Society of Radiology, RSNA, Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine, European Society of Medical Imaging Informatics, Canadian Association of Radiologists, and American Association of Physicists in Medicine. AI has great potential to increase efficiency and accuracy throughout radiology, but also carries inherent pitfalls and biases. Widespread use of AI-based intelligent and autonomous systems in radiology can increase the risk of systemic errors with high consequence, and highlights complex ethical and societal issues. Currently, there is little experience using AI for patient care in diverse clinical settings. Extensive research is needed to understand how to best deploy AI in clinical practice. This statement highlights our consensus that ethical use of AI in radiology should promote well-being, minimize harm, and ensure that the benefits and harms are distributed among stakeholders in a just manner. We believe AI should respect human rights and freedoms, including dignity and privacy. It should be designed for maximum transparency and dependability. Ultimate responsibility and accountability for AI remains with its human designers and operators for the foreseeable future. The radiology community should start now to develop codes of ethics and practice for AI which promote any use that helps patients and the common good and should block use of radiology data and algorithms for financial gain without those two attributes.
topic Ethics
Artificial Intelligence
Radiology
Machine Learning
Data
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13244-019-0785-8
work_keys_str_mv AT jraymondgeis ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT adrianbrady ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT carolcwu ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT jackspencer ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT erikranschaert ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT jacobljaremko ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT steveglanger ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT andreaborondykitts ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT judybirch ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT williamfshields ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT robertvandenhovenvangenderen ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT elmarkotter ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT judywawiragichoya ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT tessascook ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT matthewbmorgan ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT antang ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT nabilemsafdar ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT marckohli ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
_version_ 1724537008859119616