The Status of the Propaganda Theorist: A Rejoinder

In Propaganda Talk (1988), Dennis Rohatyn’s fictional spokesperson argues that even those (including Jacques Ellul) who analyse and discuss propaganda are themselves propagandists. This ‘membership claim’ seriously misrepresents the agency of the propaganda theorist. Different aims and epistemic va...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stanley B. Cunningham
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 1994-01-01
Series:Informal Logic
Subjects:
Online Access:https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2446
id doaj-89711bbcbee740db9ccae5444a70cae3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-89711bbcbee740db9ccae5444a70cae32020-11-25T02:53:18ZengUniversity of WindsorInformal Logic0824-25772293-734X1994-01-0116210.22329/il.v16i2.2446The Status of the Propaganda Theorist: A RejoinderStanley B. Cunningham In Propaganda Talk (1988), Dennis Rohatyn’s fictional spokesperson argues that even those (including Jacques Ellul) who analyse and discuss propaganda are themselves propagandists. This ‘membership claim’ seriously misrepresents the agency of the propaganda theorist. Different aims and epistemic values distinguish the actions of the theorist from those of the propagandist. Frontline propagandists prefer to use truth, but only because of its strategic utility. Most of all they value belief and credibility, and their principal aim is to modify behavior. Propaganda theorists, by contrast, esteem truthfulness (or “knowing well”); and their principal aim is to understand and to disclose propaganda as a social phenomenon. https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2446Propagandapropaganda theoristcommunicationbelieftruthEllul
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stanley B. Cunningham
spellingShingle Stanley B. Cunningham
The Status of the Propaganda Theorist: A Rejoinder
Informal Logic
Propaganda
propaganda theorist
communication
belief
truth
Ellul
author_facet Stanley B. Cunningham
author_sort Stanley B. Cunningham
title The Status of the Propaganda Theorist: A Rejoinder
title_short The Status of the Propaganda Theorist: A Rejoinder
title_full The Status of the Propaganda Theorist: A Rejoinder
title_fullStr The Status of the Propaganda Theorist: A Rejoinder
title_full_unstemmed The Status of the Propaganda Theorist: A Rejoinder
title_sort status of the propaganda theorist: a rejoinder
publisher University of Windsor
series Informal Logic
issn 0824-2577
2293-734X
publishDate 1994-01-01
description In Propaganda Talk (1988), Dennis Rohatyn’s fictional spokesperson argues that even those (including Jacques Ellul) who analyse and discuss propaganda are themselves propagandists. This ‘membership claim’ seriously misrepresents the agency of the propaganda theorist. Different aims and epistemic values distinguish the actions of the theorist from those of the propagandist. Frontline propagandists prefer to use truth, but only because of its strategic utility. Most of all they value belief and credibility, and their principal aim is to modify behavior. Propaganda theorists, by contrast, esteem truthfulness (or “knowing well”); and their principal aim is to understand and to disclose propaganda as a social phenomenon.
topic Propaganda
propaganda theorist
communication
belief
truth
Ellul
url https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2446
work_keys_str_mv AT stanleybcunningham thestatusofthepropagandatheoristarejoinder
AT stanleybcunningham statusofthepropagandatheoristarejoinder
_version_ 1724725361323802624