Mobile App Rating Scale: A New Tool for Assessing the Quality of Health Mobile Apps

BackgroundThe use of mobile apps for health and well being promotion has grown exponentially in recent years. Yet, there is currently no app-quality assessment tool beyond “star”-ratings. ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to develop a reliable, multidimensi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stoyanov, Stoyan R, Hides, Leanne, Kavanagh, David J, Zelenko, Oksana, Tjondronegoro, Dian, Mani, Madhavan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2015-03-01
Series:JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Online Access:http://mhealth.jmir.org/2015/1/e27/
id doaj-8988fd1a4263420e82de5a7608bfcaf1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8988fd1a4263420e82de5a7608bfcaf12021-05-03T03:33:21ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR mHealth and uHealth2291-52222015-03-0131e2710.2196/mhealth.3422Mobile App Rating Scale: A New Tool for Assessing the Quality of Health Mobile AppsStoyanov, Stoyan RHides, LeanneKavanagh, David JZelenko, OksanaTjondronegoro, DianMani, Madhavan BackgroundThe use of mobile apps for health and well being promotion has grown exponentially in recent years. Yet, there is currently no app-quality assessment tool beyond “star”-ratings. ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to develop a reliable, multidimensional measure for trialling, classifying, and rating the quality of mobile health apps. MethodsA literature search was conducted to identify articles containing explicit Web or app quality rating criteria published between January 2000 and January 2013. Existing criteria for the assessment of app quality were categorized by an expert panel to develop the new Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) subscales, items, descriptors, and anchors. There were sixty well being apps that were randomly selected using an iTunes search for MARS rating. There were ten that were used to pilot the rating procedure, and the remaining 50 provided data on interrater reliability. ResultsThere were 372 explicit criteria for assessing Web or app quality that were extracted from 25 published papers, conference proceedings, and Internet resources. There were five broad categories of criteria that were identified including four objective quality scales: engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information quality; and one subjective quality scale; which were refined into the 23-item MARS. The MARS demonstrated excellent internal consistency (alpha = .90) and interrater reliability intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC = .79). ConclusionsThe MARS is a simple, objective, and reliable tool for classifying and assessing the quality of mobile health apps. It can also be used to provide a checklist for the design and development of new high quality health apps.http://mhealth.jmir.org/2015/1/e27/
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stoyanov, Stoyan R
Hides, Leanne
Kavanagh, David J
Zelenko, Oksana
Tjondronegoro, Dian
Mani, Madhavan
spellingShingle Stoyanov, Stoyan R
Hides, Leanne
Kavanagh, David J
Zelenko, Oksana
Tjondronegoro, Dian
Mani, Madhavan
Mobile App Rating Scale: A New Tool for Assessing the Quality of Health Mobile Apps
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
author_facet Stoyanov, Stoyan R
Hides, Leanne
Kavanagh, David J
Zelenko, Oksana
Tjondronegoro, Dian
Mani, Madhavan
author_sort Stoyanov, Stoyan R
title Mobile App Rating Scale: A New Tool for Assessing the Quality of Health Mobile Apps
title_short Mobile App Rating Scale: A New Tool for Assessing the Quality of Health Mobile Apps
title_full Mobile App Rating Scale: A New Tool for Assessing the Quality of Health Mobile Apps
title_fullStr Mobile App Rating Scale: A New Tool for Assessing the Quality of Health Mobile Apps
title_full_unstemmed Mobile App Rating Scale: A New Tool for Assessing the Quality of Health Mobile Apps
title_sort mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps
publisher JMIR Publications
series JMIR mHealth and uHealth
issn 2291-5222
publishDate 2015-03-01
description BackgroundThe use of mobile apps for health and well being promotion has grown exponentially in recent years. Yet, there is currently no app-quality assessment tool beyond “star”-ratings. ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to develop a reliable, multidimensional measure for trialling, classifying, and rating the quality of mobile health apps. MethodsA literature search was conducted to identify articles containing explicit Web or app quality rating criteria published between January 2000 and January 2013. Existing criteria for the assessment of app quality were categorized by an expert panel to develop the new Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) subscales, items, descriptors, and anchors. There were sixty well being apps that were randomly selected using an iTunes search for MARS rating. There were ten that were used to pilot the rating procedure, and the remaining 50 provided data on interrater reliability. ResultsThere were 372 explicit criteria for assessing Web or app quality that were extracted from 25 published papers, conference proceedings, and Internet resources. There were five broad categories of criteria that were identified including four objective quality scales: engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information quality; and one subjective quality scale; which were refined into the 23-item MARS. The MARS demonstrated excellent internal consistency (alpha = .90) and interrater reliability intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC = .79). ConclusionsThe MARS is a simple, objective, and reliable tool for classifying and assessing the quality of mobile health apps. It can also be used to provide a checklist for the design and development of new high quality health apps.
url http://mhealth.jmir.org/2015/1/e27/
work_keys_str_mv AT stoyanovstoyanr mobileappratingscaleanewtoolforassessingthequalityofhealthmobileapps
AT hidesleanne mobileappratingscaleanewtoolforassessingthequalityofhealthmobileapps
AT kavanaghdavidj mobileappratingscaleanewtoolforassessingthequalityofhealthmobileapps
AT zelenkooksana mobileappratingscaleanewtoolforassessingthequalityofhealthmobileapps
AT tjondronegorodian mobileappratingscaleanewtoolforassessingthequalityofhealthmobileapps
AT manimadhavan mobileappratingscaleanewtoolforassessingthequalityofhealthmobileapps
_version_ 1721484733992402944