Interrogative Sentence: A Contrastive Study of Arabic and Indonesian
Involving first language (L1) in second language learning (L2) is considered as an effective method to be practiced. This research focuses on a contrastive study between Arabic and Indonesian. It aims to investigate similarities and differences of the two languages, especially about their interrogat...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Arabic |
Published: |
Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Arab
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Izdihar |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/izdihar/article/view/10148 |
id |
doaj-899e8450a83d4cba93c17e3834e476ff |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-899e8450a83d4cba93c17e3834e476ff2020-11-25T03:14:02ZaraProgram Studi Pendidikan Bahasa ArabIzdihar2622-738X2622-73712020-01-012318320010.22219/jiz.v2i3.101486068Interrogative Sentence: A Contrastive Study of Arabic and IndonesianKhoirin Nikmah0Universitas Muhammadiyah YogyakartaInvolving first language (L1) in second language learning (L2) is considered as an effective method to be practiced. This research focuses on a contrastive study between Arabic and Indonesian. It aims to investigate similarities and differences of the two languages, especially about their interrogative sentence forms. It is descriptive qualitative research which applies two methods; observation and introspection method. Then, Contrastive Analysis (CA) is used to analyze the data. The result shows that similarity concept between Arabic and Indonesian is many shown on matā, ayna, limādzā, and hal. Meanwhile, differences between both of them are shown on mā, man, ayy, and kayfa. As a result, it may occur errors in the use of question, errors in translating interrogative sentence, and errors in understanding question.http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/izdihar/article/view/10148contrastive analysisinterrogative sentencesecond language learning |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Arabic |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Khoirin Nikmah |
spellingShingle |
Khoirin Nikmah Interrogative Sentence: A Contrastive Study of Arabic and Indonesian Izdihar contrastive analysis interrogative sentence second language learning |
author_facet |
Khoirin Nikmah |
author_sort |
Khoirin Nikmah |
title |
Interrogative Sentence: A Contrastive Study of Arabic and Indonesian |
title_short |
Interrogative Sentence: A Contrastive Study of Arabic and Indonesian |
title_full |
Interrogative Sentence: A Contrastive Study of Arabic and Indonesian |
title_fullStr |
Interrogative Sentence: A Contrastive Study of Arabic and Indonesian |
title_full_unstemmed |
Interrogative Sentence: A Contrastive Study of Arabic and Indonesian |
title_sort |
interrogative sentence: a contrastive study of arabic and indonesian |
publisher |
Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Arab |
series |
Izdihar |
issn |
2622-738X 2622-7371 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
Involving first language (L1) in second language learning (L2) is considered as an effective method to be practiced. This research focuses on a contrastive study between Arabic and Indonesian. It aims to investigate similarities and differences of the two languages, especially about their interrogative sentence forms. It is descriptive qualitative research which applies two methods; observation and introspection method. Then, Contrastive Analysis (CA) is used to analyze the data. The result shows that similarity concept between Arabic and Indonesian is many shown on matā, ayna, limādzā, and hal. Meanwhile, differences between both of them are shown on mā, man, ayy, and kayfa. As a result, it may occur errors in the use of question, errors in translating interrogative sentence, and errors in understanding question. |
topic |
contrastive analysis interrogative sentence second language learning |
url |
http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/izdihar/article/view/10148 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT khoirinnikmah interrogativesentenceacontrastivestudyofarabicandindonesian |
_version_ |
1724644904062156800 |