The Myth of a Centralised Socialist State in Vietnam: What Kind of a Myth?

Through a case study of Vietnam, the article explores the view that there is a tendency to overstate the degree to which there is a coherent central body, namely the state, directing the country. Exploring this myth, it argues that there is a tendency to reify the state, even in writing which is att...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Martin Gainsborough
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-12-01
Series:Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341703600305
id doaj-89a9c20a2acf4031bfbffb20d9b9e3f5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-89a9c20a2acf4031bfbffb20d9b9e3f52020-11-25T03:34:41ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs1868-10341868-48822017-12-013610.1177/186810341703600305The Myth of a Centralised Socialist State in Vietnam: What Kind of a Myth?Martin Gainsborough0Development Politics, canon theologian at Bristol Cathedral, and diocesan social justice and environmental advisor.Through a case study of Vietnam, the article explores the view that there is a tendency to overstate the degree to which there is a coherent central body, namely the state, directing the country. Exploring this myth, it argues that there is a tendency to reify the state, even in writing which is attentive to localism and the diversity of societal actors at play in Vietnamese political life. The article argues that the myth of the central state endures because there are domestic and foreign political interests that depend on it. However, more fundamentally, the myth endures because of the power of the state to colonise our minds such that even when the empirical data does not fit with the idea of the state, we make it fit. The article's findings have implications for the study of politics far beyond the Vietnamese case.https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341703600305
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Martin Gainsborough
spellingShingle Martin Gainsborough
The Myth of a Centralised Socialist State in Vietnam: What Kind of a Myth?
Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs
author_facet Martin Gainsborough
author_sort Martin Gainsborough
title The Myth of a Centralised Socialist State in Vietnam: What Kind of a Myth?
title_short The Myth of a Centralised Socialist State in Vietnam: What Kind of a Myth?
title_full The Myth of a Centralised Socialist State in Vietnam: What Kind of a Myth?
title_fullStr The Myth of a Centralised Socialist State in Vietnam: What Kind of a Myth?
title_full_unstemmed The Myth of a Centralised Socialist State in Vietnam: What Kind of a Myth?
title_sort myth of a centralised socialist state in vietnam: what kind of a myth?
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs
issn 1868-1034
1868-4882
publishDate 2017-12-01
description Through a case study of Vietnam, the article explores the view that there is a tendency to overstate the degree to which there is a coherent central body, namely the state, directing the country. Exploring this myth, it argues that there is a tendency to reify the state, even in writing which is attentive to localism and the diversity of societal actors at play in Vietnamese political life. The article argues that the myth of the central state endures because there are domestic and foreign political interests that depend on it. However, more fundamentally, the myth endures because of the power of the state to colonise our minds such that even when the empirical data does not fit with the idea of the state, we make it fit. The article's findings have implications for the study of politics far beyond the Vietnamese case.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341703600305
work_keys_str_mv AT martingainsborough themythofacentralisedsocialiststateinvietnamwhatkindofamyth
AT martingainsborough mythofacentralisedsocialiststateinvietnamwhatkindofamyth
_version_ 1724558153983459328