Voice Behavior, Supervisor Attribution and Employee Performance Appraisal

Employees contribute to the sustainability of organizations in many ways, yet the specific impact of employee voice on employee performance appraisal, as an element of organization sustainability, is not clear. Based on the attribution theory, we present a model to investigate the relationship betwe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiaoyan Su, Yating Liu, Nancy Hanson-Rasmussen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-10-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/10/1829
id doaj-8a234fd485134212ad55df48d27110f4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8a234fd485134212ad55df48d27110f42020-11-25T00:15:36ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502017-10-01910182910.3390/su9101829su9101829Voice Behavior, Supervisor Attribution and Employee Performance AppraisalXiaoyan Su0Yating Liu1Nancy Hanson-Rasmussen2International Business School, Jinan University, Zhuhai 519070, ChinaInternational Business School, Jinan University, Zhuhai 519070, ChinaSchool of Business, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire, WI 54702, USAEmployees contribute to the sustainability of organizations in many ways, yet the specific impact of employee voice on employee performance appraisal, as an element of organization sustainability, is not clear. Based on the attribution theory, we present a model to investigate the relationship between employee voice and employee performance appraisal. Using the PLS (Partial Least Squares) method, we test our model’s hypotheses with 273 dyads of supervisor-employee questionnaires administered on a branch of a state-owned enterprise in China. The results show that promotive voice is positively attributed to prosocial motives and constructive motives, while prohibitive voice is not significantly attributed to prosocial motives and constructive motives. The attribution of prosocial motives and constructive motives has a significant and positive effect on employees’ performance appraisal. Moreover, the attribution of prosocial motives and constructive motives fully mediates the relationship between promotive voice and performance appraisal, but has no mediating effects on the relationship between prohibitive voice and performance appraisal.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/10/1829promotive voiceprohibitive voiceprosocial motivesconstructive motivesperformance appraisalorganization sustainability
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xiaoyan Su
Yating Liu
Nancy Hanson-Rasmussen
spellingShingle Xiaoyan Su
Yating Liu
Nancy Hanson-Rasmussen
Voice Behavior, Supervisor Attribution and Employee Performance Appraisal
Sustainability
promotive voice
prohibitive voice
prosocial motives
constructive motives
performance appraisal
organization sustainability
author_facet Xiaoyan Su
Yating Liu
Nancy Hanson-Rasmussen
author_sort Xiaoyan Su
title Voice Behavior, Supervisor Attribution and Employee Performance Appraisal
title_short Voice Behavior, Supervisor Attribution and Employee Performance Appraisal
title_full Voice Behavior, Supervisor Attribution and Employee Performance Appraisal
title_fullStr Voice Behavior, Supervisor Attribution and Employee Performance Appraisal
title_full_unstemmed Voice Behavior, Supervisor Attribution and Employee Performance Appraisal
title_sort voice behavior, supervisor attribution and employee performance appraisal
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2017-10-01
description Employees contribute to the sustainability of organizations in many ways, yet the specific impact of employee voice on employee performance appraisal, as an element of organization sustainability, is not clear. Based on the attribution theory, we present a model to investigate the relationship between employee voice and employee performance appraisal. Using the PLS (Partial Least Squares) method, we test our model’s hypotheses with 273 dyads of supervisor-employee questionnaires administered on a branch of a state-owned enterprise in China. The results show that promotive voice is positively attributed to prosocial motives and constructive motives, while prohibitive voice is not significantly attributed to prosocial motives and constructive motives. The attribution of prosocial motives and constructive motives has a significant and positive effect on employees’ performance appraisal. Moreover, the attribution of prosocial motives and constructive motives fully mediates the relationship between promotive voice and performance appraisal, but has no mediating effects on the relationship between prohibitive voice and performance appraisal.
topic promotive voice
prohibitive voice
prosocial motives
constructive motives
performance appraisal
organization sustainability
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/10/1829
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoyansu voicebehaviorsupervisorattributionandemployeeperformanceappraisal
AT yatingliu voicebehaviorsupervisorattributionandemployeeperformanceappraisal
AT nancyhansonrasmussen voicebehaviorsupervisorattributionandemployeeperformanceappraisal
_version_ 1725385985531838464