Defining floors and ceilings: the contribution of human needs theory
This article argues that a theory of human needs is essential to buttress and give content to the concept of consumption corridors. In particular it enables us to, first, define a safe, just, and sustainable space for humanity, and second, to decompose and recompose consumption based on a distinctio...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2020.1814033 |
id |
doaj-8a27e081088a464abe801ff8be29eb72 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8a27e081088a464abe801ff8be29eb722021-02-08T14:09:13ZengTaylor & Francis GroupSustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy1548-77332020-12-0116120821910.1080/15487733.2020.18140331814033Defining floors and ceilings: the contribution of human needs theoryIan Gough0Centre for the Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of EconomicsThis article argues that a theory of human needs is essential to buttress and give content to the concept of consumption corridors. In particular it enables us to, first, define a safe, just, and sustainable space for humanity, and second, to decompose and recompose consumption based on a distinction between necessities and luxuries. After an introduction, the article is divided into four parts. The first compares different concepts of human needs and concentrates on universalizable need theories. The second presents a method for agreeing on contextual need satisfiers, and the third discusses current research identifying the floors of poverty and necessities. A fourth section then sets out how sustainable needs can underpin the upper bound of the corridor and how this ceiling might be measured in income and consumption terms. However, once we move from a national to a global perspective a profound dilemma is encountered as rich country corridors diverge from a global consumption corridor.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2020.1814033needsnecessitiesluxuriesceilingsmaximum incomedemocratic dialogueecological constraints |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ian Gough |
spellingShingle |
Ian Gough Defining floors and ceilings: the contribution of human needs theory Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy needs necessities luxuries ceilings maximum income democratic dialogue ecological constraints |
author_facet |
Ian Gough |
author_sort |
Ian Gough |
title |
Defining floors and ceilings: the contribution of human needs theory |
title_short |
Defining floors and ceilings: the contribution of human needs theory |
title_full |
Defining floors and ceilings: the contribution of human needs theory |
title_fullStr |
Defining floors and ceilings: the contribution of human needs theory |
title_full_unstemmed |
Defining floors and ceilings: the contribution of human needs theory |
title_sort |
defining floors and ceilings: the contribution of human needs theory |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
series |
Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy |
issn |
1548-7733 |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
This article argues that a theory of human needs is essential to buttress and give content to the concept of consumption corridors. In particular it enables us to, first, define a safe, just, and sustainable space for humanity, and second, to decompose and recompose consumption based on a distinction between necessities and luxuries. After an introduction, the article is divided into four parts. The first compares different concepts of human needs and concentrates on universalizable need theories. The second presents a method for agreeing on contextual need satisfiers, and the third discusses current research identifying the floors of poverty and necessities. A fourth section then sets out how sustainable needs can underpin the upper bound of the corridor and how this ceiling might be measured in income and consumption terms. However, once we move from a national to a global perspective a profound dilemma is encountered as rich country corridors diverge from a global consumption corridor. |
topic |
needs necessities luxuries ceilings maximum income democratic dialogue ecological constraints |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2020.1814033 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT iangough definingfloorsandceilingsthecontributionofhumanneedstheory |
_version_ |
1724279949186039808 |