Comparison of TEC Calculations Based on Trimble, Javad, Leica, and Septentrio GNSS Receiver Data

A Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receiver is, to some extent, a “black box” when its data is used for ionospheric studies. Our results based on Javad, Septentrio, Trimble, and Leica GNSS receivers have proven that the accuracy of the slant Total Electron Content (TEC) calculation can diff...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vladislav Demyanov, Maria Sergeeva, Mark Fedorov, Tatiana Ishina, Victor Jose Gatica-Acevedo, Enrique Cabral-Cano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-10-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/19/3268
Description
Summary:A Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receiver is, to some extent, a “black box” when its data is used for ionospheric studies. Our results based on Javad, Septentrio, Trimble, and Leica GNSS receivers have proven that the accuracy of the slant Total Electron Content (TEC) calculation can differ significantly depending on the GNSS receiver type/model, because TEC measurements depend on the carrier phase tracking technique applied in a receiver. The correlation coefficient between carrier phase noise in L1 and L2 channels is considered as a possible indicator that shows if the L1-aided tracking technique or independent tracking is applied inside a receiver. An empirical model of the TEC noise component was provided to determine the TEC noise value in different types/models of GNSS receivers.
ISSN:2072-4292