Practice patterns and predictors of prophylactic endoscopic clip usage during polypectomy
Background and study aims Prophylactic endoscopic clips are commonly placed during polypectomy to reduce risk of delayed bleeding, although evidence to support this practice is unclear. Our study aimed to: (1) identify variables associated with prophylactic clip use; (2) explore variability between...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2019-08-01
|
Series: | Endoscopy International Open |
Online Access: | http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-0953-1787 |
id |
doaj-8a49df5dee4f4c00a15c1f63d7a9d597 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8a49df5dee4f4c00a15c1f63d7a9d5972020-11-25T02:38:17ZengGeorg Thieme Verlag KGEndoscopy International Open2364-37222196-97362019-08-010709E1051E106010.1055/a-0953-1787Practice patterns and predictors of prophylactic endoscopic clip usage during polypectomyNauzer Forbes0Robert J. Hilsden1Gilaad G. Kaplan2Matthew T. James3Cord Lethebe4Courtney Maxwell5Steven J. Heitman6Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaClinical Research Unit, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaForzani & MacPhail Colon Cancer Screening Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaBackground and study aims Prophylactic endoscopic clips are commonly placed during polypectomy to reduce risk of delayed bleeding, although evidence to support this practice is unclear. Our study aimed to: (1) identify variables associated with prophylactic clip use; (2) explore variability between endoscopists’ clipping practices and (3) study temporal trends in prophylactic clip use. Patients and methods This was a retrospective cohort study in a high-volume unit dedicated to screening-related colonoscopies. Colonoscopies involving polypectomy from 2008 to 2014 were reviewed. The primary outcome was prophylactic clipping status, both at the patient level and per polyp. Hierarchical regression models yielded adjusted odds ratios (AORs) to determine predictors of prophylactic clipping. Results A total of 8,366 colonoscopies involving 19,129 polypectomies were included. Polyp size ≥ 20 mm was associated with higher clip usage (AOR 2.94; 95 % CI: 2.43, 3.54) compared to polyps < 10 mm. Right-sided polyps were more likely to be clipped (AOR 2.78; 95 % CI: 2.34, 3.30) relative to the rectum. Surgeons clipped less than gastroenterologists (OR 0.52; 95 % CI: 0.44, 0.63). From 2008 to 2014, the crude proportion of prophylactically clipped cases increased by 7.4 % (95 % CI: 7.1, 7.6) from 1.9 % to 9.3 %. Significant inter-endoscopist variability in clipping practices was observed, notably, for polyps < 10 mm. Conclusions Prophylactic clip usage was correlated with established risk factors for delayed bleeding. Significantly increased clip usage over time was shown. Given that evidence does not clearly support prophylactic clipping, there is a need to educate practitioners and limit healthcare resource utilization.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-0953-1787 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nauzer Forbes Robert J. Hilsden Gilaad G. Kaplan Matthew T. James Cord Lethebe Courtney Maxwell Steven J. Heitman |
spellingShingle |
Nauzer Forbes Robert J. Hilsden Gilaad G. Kaplan Matthew T. James Cord Lethebe Courtney Maxwell Steven J. Heitman Practice patterns and predictors of prophylactic endoscopic clip usage during polypectomy Endoscopy International Open |
author_facet |
Nauzer Forbes Robert J. Hilsden Gilaad G. Kaplan Matthew T. James Cord Lethebe Courtney Maxwell Steven J. Heitman |
author_sort |
Nauzer Forbes |
title |
Practice patterns and predictors of prophylactic endoscopic clip usage during polypectomy |
title_short |
Practice patterns and predictors of prophylactic endoscopic clip usage during polypectomy |
title_full |
Practice patterns and predictors of prophylactic endoscopic clip usage during polypectomy |
title_fullStr |
Practice patterns and predictors of prophylactic endoscopic clip usage during polypectomy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Practice patterns and predictors of prophylactic endoscopic clip usage during polypectomy |
title_sort |
practice patterns and predictors of prophylactic endoscopic clip usage during polypectomy |
publisher |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
series |
Endoscopy International Open |
issn |
2364-3722 2196-9736 |
publishDate |
2019-08-01 |
description |
Background and study aims Prophylactic endoscopic clips are commonly placed during polypectomy to reduce risk of delayed bleeding, although evidence to support this practice is unclear. Our study aimed to: (1) identify variables associated with prophylactic clip use; (2) explore variability between endoscopists’ clipping practices and (3) study temporal trends in prophylactic clip use.
Patients and methods This was a retrospective cohort study in a high-volume unit dedicated to screening-related colonoscopies. Colonoscopies involving polypectomy from 2008 to 2014 were reviewed. The primary outcome was prophylactic clipping status, both at the patient level and per polyp. Hierarchical regression models yielded adjusted odds ratios (AORs) to determine predictors of prophylactic clipping.
Results A total of 8,366 colonoscopies involving 19,129 polypectomies were included. Polyp size ≥ 20 mm was associated with higher clip usage (AOR 2.94; 95 % CI: 2.43, 3.54) compared to polyps < 10 mm. Right-sided polyps were more likely to be clipped (AOR 2.78; 95 % CI: 2.34, 3.30) relative to the rectum. Surgeons clipped less than gastroenterologists (OR 0.52; 95 % CI: 0.44, 0.63). From 2008 to 2014, the crude proportion of prophylactically clipped cases increased by 7.4 % (95 % CI: 7.1, 7.6) from 1.9 % to 9.3 %. Significant inter-endoscopist variability in clipping practices was observed, notably, for polyps < 10 mm.
Conclusions Prophylactic clip usage was correlated with established risk factors for delayed bleeding. Significantly increased clip usage over time was shown. Given that evidence does not clearly support prophylactic clipping, there is a need to educate practitioners and limit healthcare resource utilization. |
url |
http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-0953-1787 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nauzerforbes practicepatternsandpredictorsofprophylacticendoscopicclipusageduringpolypectomy AT robertjhilsden practicepatternsandpredictorsofprophylacticendoscopicclipusageduringpolypectomy AT gilaadgkaplan practicepatternsandpredictorsofprophylacticendoscopicclipusageduringpolypectomy AT matthewtjames practicepatternsandpredictorsofprophylacticendoscopicclipusageduringpolypectomy AT cordlethebe practicepatternsandpredictorsofprophylacticendoscopicclipusageduringpolypectomy AT courtneymaxwell practicepatternsandpredictorsofprophylacticendoscopicclipusageduringpolypectomy AT stevenjheitman practicepatternsandpredictorsofprophylacticendoscopicclipusageduringpolypectomy |
_version_ |
1724791654320177152 |