Practice patterns and predictors of prophylactic endoscopic clip usage during polypectomy

Background and study aims Prophylactic endoscopic clips are commonly placed during polypectomy to reduce risk of delayed bleeding, although evidence to support this practice is unclear. Our study aimed to: (1) identify variables associated with prophylactic clip use; (2) explore variability between...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nauzer Forbes, Robert J. Hilsden, Gilaad G. Kaplan, Matthew T. James, Cord Lethebe, Courtney Maxwell, Steven J. Heitman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019-08-01
Series:Endoscopy International Open
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-0953-1787
id doaj-8a49df5dee4f4c00a15c1f63d7a9d597
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8a49df5dee4f4c00a15c1f63d7a9d5972020-11-25T02:38:17ZengGeorg Thieme Verlag KGEndoscopy International Open2364-37222196-97362019-08-010709E1051E106010.1055/a-0953-1787Practice patterns and predictors of prophylactic endoscopic clip usage during polypectomyNauzer Forbes0Robert J. Hilsden1Gilaad G. Kaplan2Matthew T. James3Cord Lethebe4Courtney Maxwell5Steven J. Heitman6Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaClinical Research Unit, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaForzani & MacPhail Colon Cancer Screening Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaBackground and study aims Prophylactic endoscopic clips are commonly placed during polypectomy to reduce risk of delayed bleeding, although evidence to support this practice is unclear. Our study aimed to: (1) identify variables associated with prophylactic clip use; (2) explore variability between endoscopists’ clipping practices and (3) study temporal trends in prophylactic clip use. Patients and methods This was a retrospective cohort study in a high-volume unit dedicated to screening-related colonoscopies. Colonoscopies involving polypectomy from 2008 to 2014 were reviewed. The primary outcome was prophylactic clipping status, both at the patient level and per polyp. Hierarchical regression models yielded adjusted odds ratios (AORs) to determine predictors of prophylactic clipping. Results A total of 8,366 colonoscopies involving 19,129 polypectomies were included. Polyp size ≥ 20 mm was associated with higher clip usage (AOR 2.94; 95 % CI: 2.43, 3.54) compared to polyps < 10 mm. Right-sided polyps were more likely to be clipped (AOR 2.78; 95 % CI: 2.34, 3.30) relative to the rectum. Surgeons clipped less than gastroenterologists (OR 0.52; 95 % CI: 0.44, 0.63). From 2008 to 2014, the crude proportion of prophylactically clipped cases increased by 7.4 % (95 % CI: 7.1, 7.6) from 1.9 % to 9.3 %. Significant inter-endoscopist variability in clipping practices was observed, notably, for polyps < 10 mm. Conclusions Prophylactic clip usage was correlated with established risk factors for delayed bleeding. Significantly increased clip usage over time was shown. Given that evidence does not clearly support prophylactic clipping, there is a need to educate practitioners and limit healthcare resource utilization.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-0953-1787
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nauzer Forbes
Robert J. Hilsden
Gilaad G. Kaplan
Matthew T. James
Cord Lethebe
Courtney Maxwell
Steven J. Heitman
spellingShingle Nauzer Forbes
Robert J. Hilsden
Gilaad G. Kaplan
Matthew T. James
Cord Lethebe
Courtney Maxwell
Steven J. Heitman
Practice patterns and predictors of prophylactic endoscopic clip usage during polypectomy
Endoscopy International Open
author_facet Nauzer Forbes
Robert J. Hilsden
Gilaad G. Kaplan
Matthew T. James
Cord Lethebe
Courtney Maxwell
Steven J. Heitman
author_sort Nauzer Forbes
title Practice patterns and predictors of prophylactic endoscopic clip usage during polypectomy
title_short Practice patterns and predictors of prophylactic endoscopic clip usage during polypectomy
title_full Practice patterns and predictors of prophylactic endoscopic clip usage during polypectomy
title_fullStr Practice patterns and predictors of prophylactic endoscopic clip usage during polypectomy
title_full_unstemmed Practice patterns and predictors of prophylactic endoscopic clip usage during polypectomy
title_sort practice patterns and predictors of prophylactic endoscopic clip usage during polypectomy
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
series Endoscopy International Open
issn 2364-3722
2196-9736
publishDate 2019-08-01
description Background and study aims Prophylactic endoscopic clips are commonly placed during polypectomy to reduce risk of delayed bleeding, although evidence to support this practice is unclear. Our study aimed to: (1) identify variables associated with prophylactic clip use; (2) explore variability between endoscopists’ clipping practices and (3) study temporal trends in prophylactic clip use. Patients and methods This was a retrospective cohort study in a high-volume unit dedicated to screening-related colonoscopies. Colonoscopies involving polypectomy from 2008 to 2014 were reviewed. The primary outcome was prophylactic clipping status, both at the patient level and per polyp. Hierarchical regression models yielded adjusted odds ratios (AORs) to determine predictors of prophylactic clipping. Results A total of 8,366 colonoscopies involving 19,129 polypectomies were included. Polyp size ≥ 20 mm was associated with higher clip usage (AOR 2.94; 95 % CI: 2.43, 3.54) compared to polyps < 10 mm. Right-sided polyps were more likely to be clipped (AOR 2.78; 95 % CI: 2.34, 3.30) relative to the rectum. Surgeons clipped less than gastroenterologists (OR 0.52; 95 % CI: 0.44, 0.63). From 2008 to 2014, the crude proportion of prophylactically clipped cases increased by 7.4 % (95 % CI: 7.1, 7.6) from 1.9 % to 9.3 %. Significant inter-endoscopist variability in clipping practices was observed, notably, for polyps < 10 mm. Conclusions Prophylactic clip usage was correlated with established risk factors for delayed bleeding. Significantly increased clip usage over time was shown. Given that evidence does not clearly support prophylactic clipping, there is a need to educate practitioners and limit healthcare resource utilization.
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-0953-1787
work_keys_str_mv AT nauzerforbes practicepatternsandpredictorsofprophylacticendoscopicclipusageduringpolypectomy
AT robertjhilsden practicepatternsandpredictorsofprophylacticendoscopicclipusageduringpolypectomy
AT gilaadgkaplan practicepatternsandpredictorsofprophylacticendoscopicclipusageduringpolypectomy
AT matthewtjames practicepatternsandpredictorsofprophylacticendoscopicclipusageduringpolypectomy
AT cordlethebe practicepatternsandpredictorsofprophylacticendoscopicclipusageduringpolypectomy
AT courtneymaxwell practicepatternsandpredictorsofprophylacticendoscopicclipusageduringpolypectomy
AT stevenjheitman practicepatternsandpredictorsofprophylacticendoscopicclipusageduringpolypectomy
_version_ 1724791654320177152