New particle formation infrequently observed in Himalayan foothills – why?

A fraction of the Himalayan aerosols originate from secondary sources, which are currently poorly quantified. To clarify the climatic importance of regional secondary particle formation in the Himalayas, data from 2005 to 2010 of continuous aerosol measurements at a high-altitude (2180 m) Indian Him...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: K. Neitola, E. Asmi, M. Komppula, A.-P. Hyvärinen, T. Raatikainen, T. S. Panwar, V. P. Sharma, H. Lihavainen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2011-08-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/8447/2011/acp-11-8447-2011.pdf
id doaj-8a533841ab8447b0bc90486302b4e26e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8a533841ab8447b0bc90486302b4e26e2020-11-25T00:01:26ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242011-08-0111168447845810.5194/acp-11-8447-2011New particle formation infrequently observed in Himalayan foothills – why?K. NeitolaE. AsmiM. KomppulaA.-P. HyvärinenT. RaatikainenT. S. PanwarV. P. SharmaH. LihavainenA fraction of the Himalayan aerosols originate from secondary sources, which are currently poorly quantified. To clarify the climatic importance of regional secondary particle formation in the Himalayas, data from 2005 to 2010 of continuous aerosol measurements at a high-altitude (2180 m) Indian Himalayan site, Mukteshwar, were analyzed. For this period, the days were classified, and the particle formation and growth rates were calculated for clear new particle formation (NPF) event days. The NPF events showed a pronounced seasonal cycle. The frequency of the events peaked in spring, when the ratio between event and non-event days was 53 %, whereas the events were truly sporadic on any other seasons. The annual mean particle formation and growth rates were 0.40 cm<sup>−3</sup> s<sup>−1</sup> and 2.43 nm h<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. The clear annual cycle was found to be mainly controlled by the seasonal evolution of the Planetary Boundary Layer (PBL) height together with local meteorological conditions. Spring NPF events were connected with increased PBL height, and therefore characterised as boundary layer events, while the rare events in other seasons represented lower free tropospheric particle formation. This provides insight on the vertical extent of NPF in the atmosphere.http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/8447/2011/acp-11-8447-2011.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author K. Neitola
E. Asmi
M. Komppula
A.-P. Hyvärinen
T. Raatikainen
T. S. Panwar
V. P. Sharma
H. Lihavainen
spellingShingle K. Neitola
E. Asmi
M. Komppula
A.-P. Hyvärinen
T. Raatikainen
T. S. Panwar
V. P. Sharma
H. Lihavainen
New particle formation infrequently observed in Himalayan foothills – why?
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
author_facet K. Neitola
E. Asmi
M. Komppula
A.-P. Hyvärinen
T. Raatikainen
T. S. Panwar
V. P. Sharma
H. Lihavainen
author_sort K. Neitola
title New particle formation infrequently observed in Himalayan foothills – why?
title_short New particle formation infrequently observed in Himalayan foothills – why?
title_full New particle formation infrequently observed in Himalayan foothills – why?
title_fullStr New particle formation infrequently observed in Himalayan foothills – why?
title_full_unstemmed New particle formation infrequently observed in Himalayan foothills – why?
title_sort new particle formation infrequently observed in himalayan foothills – why?
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
publishDate 2011-08-01
description A fraction of the Himalayan aerosols originate from secondary sources, which are currently poorly quantified. To clarify the climatic importance of regional secondary particle formation in the Himalayas, data from 2005 to 2010 of continuous aerosol measurements at a high-altitude (2180 m) Indian Himalayan site, Mukteshwar, were analyzed. For this period, the days were classified, and the particle formation and growth rates were calculated for clear new particle formation (NPF) event days. The NPF events showed a pronounced seasonal cycle. The frequency of the events peaked in spring, when the ratio between event and non-event days was 53 %, whereas the events were truly sporadic on any other seasons. The annual mean particle formation and growth rates were 0.40 cm<sup>−3</sup> s<sup>−1</sup> and 2.43 nm h<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. The clear annual cycle was found to be mainly controlled by the seasonal evolution of the Planetary Boundary Layer (PBL) height together with local meteorological conditions. Spring NPF events were connected with increased PBL height, and therefore characterised as boundary layer events, while the rare events in other seasons represented lower free tropospheric particle formation. This provides insight on the vertical extent of NPF in the atmosphere.
url http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/8447/2011/acp-11-8447-2011.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT kneitola newparticleformationinfrequentlyobservedinhimalayanfoothillswhy
AT easmi newparticleformationinfrequentlyobservedinhimalayanfoothillswhy
AT mkomppula newparticleformationinfrequentlyobservedinhimalayanfoothillswhy
AT aphyvarinen newparticleformationinfrequentlyobservedinhimalayanfoothillswhy
AT traatikainen newparticleformationinfrequentlyobservedinhimalayanfoothillswhy
AT tspanwar newparticleformationinfrequentlyobservedinhimalayanfoothillswhy
AT vpsharma newparticleformationinfrequentlyobservedinhimalayanfoothillswhy
AT hlihavainen newparticleformationinfrequentlyobservedinhimalayanfoothillswhy
_version_ 1725442107893612544