Drive-by Photoscreening [Response to Letter]
Robert Arnold, 1 Mason Keffalos, 2 Samuel Martin 1 1Alaska Blind Child Discovery, Anchorage, AK, USA; 2Boise State University, Boise, ID, USACorrespondence: Robert ArnoldAlaska Blind Child Discovery, Alaska Children’s EYE & Strabismus, 3500, Latouche #280, Anchorage, AK, 99508, U...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Dove Medical Press
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Clinical Ophthalmology |
Online Access: | https://www.dovepress.com/response-drive-by-photoscreening-peer-reviewed-article-OPTH |
id |
doaj-8a62840e3c284d32a6cab991d50d1327 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8a62840e3c284d32a6cab991d50d13272021-04-11T18:10:43ZengDove Medical PressClinical Ophthalmology1177-54832021-04-01Volume 151463146463755Drive-by Photoscreening [Response to Letter]Arnold RKeffalos MMartin SRobert Arnold, 1 Mason Keffalos, 2 Samuel Martin 1 1Alaska Blind Child Discovery, Anchorage, AK, USA; 2Boise State University, Boise, ID, USACorrespondence: Robert ArnoldAlaska Blind Child Discovery, Alaska Children’s EYE & Strabismus, 3500, Latouche #280, Anchorage, AK, 99508, USATel +1 907561-1917Fax +1 907563-5373Email eyedoc@alaska.net Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the excellent and informative letter by Dr. David Hunter. For our attempt at Drive by Photoscreening,1 the wire-and-opaque-plastic shielded sufficient ambient light so that blinq could get a reading outdoors, but the performance of blinq suffered compared to conventional indoor use. We surmised this may have been due to the lack of facial view for the aiming beams, but we agree with Dr. Hunter that disruption of infrared light could also have been the culprit. View the original paper by Keffalos and colleagues This is in response to the Letter to the Editor https://www.dovepress.com/response-drive-by-photoscreening-peer-reviewed-article-OPTH |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Arnold R Keffalos M Martin S |
spellingShingle |
Arnold R Keffalos M Martin S Drive-by Photoscreening [Response to Letter] Clinical Ophthalmology |
author_facet |
Arnold R Keffalos M Martin S |
author_sort |
Arnold R |
title |
Drive-by Photoscreening [Response to Letter] |
title_short |
Drive-by Photoscreening [Response to Letter] |
title_full |
Drive-by Photoscreening [Response to Letter] |
title_fullStr |
Drive-by Photoscreening [Response to Letter] |
title_full_unstemmed |
Drive-by Photoscreening [Response to Letter] |
title_sort |
drive-by photoscreening [response to letter] |
publisher |
Dove Medical Press |
series |
Clinical Ophthalmology |
issn |
1177-5483 |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
Robert Arnold, 1 Mason Keffalos, 2 Samuel Martin 1 1Alaska Blind Child Discovery, Anchorage, AK, USA; 2Boise State University, Boise, ID, USACorrespondence: Robert ArnoldAlaska Blind Child Discovery, Alaska Children’s EYE & Strabismus, 3500, Latouche #280, Anchorage, AK, 99508, USATel +1 907561-1917Fax +1 907563-5373Email eyedoc@alaska.net
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the excellent and informative letter by Dr. David Hunter.
For our attempt at Drive by Photoscreening,1 the wire-and-opaque-plastic shielded sufficient ambient light so that blinq could get a reading outdoors, but the performance of blinq suffered compared to conventional indoor use. We surmised this may have been due to the lack of facial view for the aiming beams, but we agree with Dr. Hunter that disruption of infrared light could also have been the culprit.
View the original paper by Keffalos and colleagues
This is in response to the Letter to the Editor
|
url |
https://www.dovepress.com/response-drive-by-photoscreening-peer-reviewed-article-OPTH |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT arnoldr drivebyphotoscreeningresponsetoletter AT keffalosm drivebyphotoscreeningresponsetoletter AT martins drivebyphotoscreeningresponsetoletter |
_version_ |
1721530600132706304 |