Seismic Capacity Design and Retrofit of Reinforced Concrete Staggered Wall Structures

Abstract This study investigates the seismic performance of a staggered wall structure designed with conventional strength based design, and compares it with the performance of the structure designed by capacity design procedure which ensures strong column-weak beam concept. Then the seismic reinfor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jinkoo Kim, Younghoo Choi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2017-05-01
Series:International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40069-017-0192-9
id doaj-8ad5280ecae942b580ef2296e8453c5c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8ad5280ecae942b580ef2296e8453c5c2020-11-25T00:32:15ZengSpringerOpenInternational Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials1976-04852234-13152017-05-0111228530010.1007/s40069-017-0192-9Seismic Capacity Design and Retrofit of Reinforced Concrete Staggered Wall StructuresJinkoo Kim0Younghoo Choi1Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Sungkyunkwan UniversityMCS-st Structural EngineeringAbstract This study investigates the seismic performance of a staggered wall structure designed with conventional strength based design, and compares it with the performance of the structure designed by capacity design procedure which ensures strong column-weak beam concept. Then the seismic reinforcement schemes such as addition of interior columns or insertion of rotational friction dampers at the ends of connecting beams are validated by comparing their seismic performances with those of the standard model structure. Fragility analysis shows that the probability to reach the dynamic instability is highest in the strength designed structure and is lowest in the structure with friction dampers. It is also observed that, at least for the specific model structures considered in this study, R factor of 5.0 can be used in the seismic design of staggered wall structures with proposed retrofit schemes, while R factor of 3.0 may be reasonable for standard staggered wall structures.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40069-017-0192-9staggered wall structuresseismic performancecapacity designfriction dampers
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jinkoo Kim
Younghoo Choi
spellingShingle Jinkoo Kim
Younghoo Choi
Seismic Capacity Design and Retrofit of Reinforced Concrete Staggered Wall Structures
International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials
staggered wall structures
seismic performance
capacity design
friction dampers
author_facet Jinkoo Kim
Younghoo Choi
author_sort Jinkoo Kim
title Seismic Capacity Design and Retrofit of Reinforced Concrete Staggered Wall Structures
title_short Seismic Capacity Design and Retrofit of Reinforced Concrete Staggered Wall Structures
title_full Seismic Capacity Design and Retrofit of Reinforced Concrete Staggered Wall Structures
title_fullStr Seismic Capacity Design and Retrofit of Reinforced Concrete Staggered Wall Structures
title_full_unstemmed Seismic Capacity Design and Retrofit of Reinforced Concrete Staggered Wall Structures
title_sort seismic capacity design and retrofit of reinforced concrete staggered wall structures
publisher SpringerOpen
series International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials
issn 1976-0485
2234-1315
publishDate 2017-05-01
description Abstract This study investigates the seismic performance of a staggered wall structure designed with conventional strength based design, and compares it with the performance of the structure designed by capacity design procedure which ensures strong column-weak beam concept. Then the seismic reinforcement schemes such as addition of interior columns or insertion of rotational friction dampers at the ends of connecting beams are validated by comparing their seismic performances with those of the standard model structure. Fragility analysis shows that the probability to reach the dynamic instability is highest in the strength designed structure and is lowest in the structure with friction dampers. It is also observed that, at least for the specific model structures considered in this study, R factor of 5.0 can be used in the seismic design of staggered wall structures with proposed retrofit schemes, while R factor of 3.0 may be reasonable for standard staggered wall structures.
topic staggered wall structures
seismic performance
capacity design
friction dampers
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40069-017-0192-9
work_keys_str_mv AT jinkookim seismiccapacitydesignandretrofitofreinforcedconcretestaggeredwallstructures
AT younghoochoi seismiccapacitydesignandretrofitofreinforcedconcretestaggeredwallstructures
_version_ 1725320064980221952