Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: A Protocol and Risk Mitigation Guide

Non-invasive brain stimulation has been increasingly investigated, mainly in adults, with the aims of influencing motor recovery after stroke. However, a consensus on safety and optimal study design has not been established in pediatrics. The low incidence of reported major adverse events in adults...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bernadette T. Gillick, Andrew M. Gordon, Tim Feyma, Linda E. Krach, Jason Carmel, Tonya L. Rich, Yannick Bleyenheuft, Kathleen Friel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fped.2018.00056/full
id doaj-8b08f7f72cb44dea9ba65e4fb61e6dfa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8b08f7f72cb44dea9ba65e4fb61e6dfa2020-11-24T22:51:22ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pediatrics2296-23602018-03-01610.3389/fped.2018.00056299499Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: A Protocol and Risk Mitigation GuideBernadette T. Gillick0Andrew M. Gordon1Tim Feyma2Linda E. Krach3Jason Carmel4Tonya L. Rich5Yannick Bleyenheuft6Kathleen Friel7Physical Therapy Division, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United StatesDepartment of Biobehavioral Sciences, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, United StatesGillette Children’s Specialty Healthcare, Pediatric Neurology, St. Paul, MN, United StatesCourage Kenny Rehabilitation Institute, Minneapolis, MN, United StatesWeill-Cornell Medical College, Blythedale Children’s Hospital, Burke Medical Research Institute, White Plains, NY, United StatesRehabilitation Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United StatesInstitute of Neuroscience (IoNS), Universite catholique de Louvain, Brussels, BelgiumWeill-Cornell Medical College, Blythedale Children’s Hospital, Burke Medical Research Institute, White Plains, NY, United StatesNon-invasive brain stimulation has been increasingly investigated, mainly in adults, with the aims of influencing motor recovery after stroke. However, a consensus on safety and optimal study design has not been established in pediatrics. The low incidence of reported major adverse events in adults with and without clinical conditions has expedited the exploration of NIBS in children with paralleled purposes to influence motor skill development after neurological injury. Considering developmental variability in children, with or without a neurologic diagnosis, adult dosing and protocols may not be appropriate. The purpose of this paper is to present recommendations and tools for the prevention and mitigation of adverse events (AEs) during NIBS in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP). Our recommendations provide a framework for pediatric NIBS study design. The key components of this report on NIBS AEs are (a) a summary of related literature to provide the background evidence and (b) tools for anticipating and managing AEs from four international pediatric laboratories. These recommendations provide a preliminary guide for the assessment of safety and risk mitigation of NIBS in children with UCP. Consistent reporting of safety, feasibility, and tolerability will refine NIBS practice guidelines contributing to future clinical translations of NIBS.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fped.2018.00056/fullcerebral palsynon-invasive brain stimulationtranscranial magnetic stimulationtranscranial direct current stimulationrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationsafety
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bernadette T. Gillick
Andrew M. Gordon
Tim Feyma
Linda E. Krach
Jason Carmel
Tonya L. Rich
Yannick Bleyenheuft
Kathleen Friel
spellingShingle Bernadette T. Gillick
Andrew M. Gordon
Tim Feyma
Linda E. Krach
Jason Carmel
Tonya L. Rich
Yannick Bleyenheuft
Kathleen Friel
Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: A Protocol and Risk Mitigation Guide
Frontiers in Pediatrics
cerebral palsy
non-invasive brain stimulation
transcranial magnetic stimulation
transcranial direct current stimulation
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
safety
author_facet Bernadette T. Gillick
Andrew M. Gordon
Tim Feyma
Linda E. Krach
Jason Carmel
Tonya L. Rich
Yannick Bleyenheuft
Kathleen Friel
author_sort Bernadette T. Gillick
title Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: A Protocol and Risk Mitigation Guide
title_short Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: A Protocol and Risk Mitigation Guide
title_full Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: A Protocol and Risk Mitigation Guide
title_fullStr Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: A Protocol and Risk Mitigation Guide
title_full_unstemmed Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: A Protocol and Risk Mitigation Guide
title_sort non-invasive brain stimulation in children with unilateral cerebral palsy: a protocol and risk mitigation guide
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Pediatrics
issn 2296-2360
publishDate 2018-03-01
description Non-invasive brain stimulation has been increasingly investigated, mainly in adults, with the aims of influencing motor recovery after stroke. However, a consensus on safety and optimal study design has not been established in pediatrics. The low incidence of reported major adverse events in adults with and without clinical conditions has expedited the exploration of NIBS in children with paralleled purposes to influence motor skill development after neurological injury. Considering developmental variability in children, with or without a neurologic diagnosis, adult dosing and protocols may not be appropriate. The purpose of this paper is to present recommendations and tools for the prevention and mitigation of adverse events (AEs) during NIBS in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP). Our recommendations provide a framework for pediatric NIBS study design. The key components of this report on NIBS AEs are (a) a summary of related literature to provide the background evidence and (b) tools for anticipating and managing AEs from four international pediatric laboratories. These recommendations provide a preliminary guide for the assessment of safety and risk mitigation of NIBS in children with UCP. Consistent reporting of safety, feasibility, and tolerability will refine NIBS practice guidelines contributing to future clinical translations of NIBS.
topic cerebral palsy
non-invasive brain stimulation
transcranial magnetic stimulation
transcranial direct current stimulation
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
safety
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fped.2018.00056/full
work_keys_str_mv AT bernadettetgillick noninvasivebrainstimulationinchildrenwithunilateralcerebralpalsyaprotocolandriskmitigationguide
AT andrewmgordon noninvasivebrainstimulationinchildrenwithunilateralcerebralpalsyaprotocolandriskmitigationguide
AT timfeyma noninvasivebrainstimulationinchildrenwithunilateralcerebralpalsyaprotocolandriskmitigationguide
AT lindaekrach noninvasivebrainstimulationinchildrenwithunilateralcerebralpalsyaprotocolandriskmitigationguide
AT jasoncarmel noninvasivebrainstimulationinchildrenwithunilateralcerebralpalsyaprotocolandriskmitigationguide
AT tonyalrich noninvasivebrainstimulationinchildrenwithunilateralcerebralpalsyaprotocolandriskmitigationguide
AT yannickbleyenheuft noninvasivebrainstimulationinchildrenwithunilateralcerebralpalsyaprotocolandriskmitigationguide
AT kathleenfriel noninvasivebrainstimulationinchildrenwithunilateralcerebralpalsyaprotocolandriskmitigationguide
_version_ 1725669967672639488