Graduate Students Reference Open Access Content in Literature Review Assignments

A Review of: Allen, E. J., & Weber, R. A. (2014). The library and the web: Graduate students’ selection of open access journals for empirical literature searches. Journal of Web Librarianship, 8(3), 243-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2014.927745 Abstract Objective – This st...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kimberly Miller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Alberta 2015-09-01
Series:Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/24672
id doaj-8b14cb9f88c0420187027fd1527c2ce1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8b14cb9f88c0420187027fd1527c2ce12020-11-24T21:23:43ZengUniversity of AlbertaEvidence Based Library and Information Practice1715-720X2015-09-0110310.18438/B87S4CGraduate Students Reference Open Access Content in Literature Review AssignmentsKimberly Miller0Towson UniversityA Review of: Allen, E. J., & Weber, R. A. (2014). The library and the web: Graduate students’ selection of open access journals for empirical literature searches. Journal of Web Librarianship, 8(3), 243-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2014.927745 Abstract Objective – This study seeks to understand to what degree education graduate students cite open access, peer-reviewed journals in their coursework and whether patterns of open access referencing change over time. Design – Longitudinal reference list analysis. Setting – Public university in the United States of America. Subjects – Reference lists collected from final literature review papers in a graduate-level education class (n = 382). Methods – The authors collected reference lists from final literature review papers in a graduate-level education class for a nine-year time frame from the 2005 to 2013 academic years. The authors analyzed 2,594 reference entries from the 382 reference lists in the sample. The authors organized reference entries into spreadsheets for analysis, creating one spreadsheet per class section and sorting references by type (e.g., book, journal article, website, etc.) and source. The authors also created a cumulative list of journal titles that they analyzed for open access status and how often the journals appeared in the sample. Other information collected about each journal included "ISSNs, national origin, journal sponsorship, frequency and years of student usage, presence of empirical research, [and] peer review status" (p. 249). Finally, the authors organized open access journals into the following four categories based on their access method: • Category A "OA Platform and Publisher" • Category B "Publisher Only" • Category C "Delay or Hybrid from Host or Publisher" • Category D "Subscription Based, but Self Archived" (p. 249) Main Results – A total of 594 unique journals appeared in reference lists over the study period, and 11.5% (n=68) of the total were open access journals. Of the open access journals, 96% (n=65) included original research articles, and the majority (n=51) fell into Category A "OA Platform and Publisher." Nine, six, and two journal titles fell into categories B, C, and D, respectively. The authors found no pattern or change in the use of open access titles during the nine-year study period. Open access journals appeared in reference lists an average of 14 times per year with the highest usage observed in 2009. Conclusion – The results show that graduate students in the sample used a range of open access journals. The presence of open access resources in reference lists signals that students may use both library subscription databases and open web search tools to complete their literature review assignments. The authors suggest potential reasons why open access use did not grow during the study period, including a possible mismatch between student research interests and the topics present in open access titles, the lack of discussion about open access publishing during library instruction, or student satisfaction with the resources provided through library-sponsored subscriptions. Librarians are encouraged to include high-quality open access resources within their catalogues or other electronic resources to increase open access discoverability and to include popular open web search tools as a means to retrieve open access materials during information literacy instruction.https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/24672evidence summary
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kimberly Miller
spellingShingle Kimberly Miller
Graduate Students Reference Open Access Content in Literature Review Assignments
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
evidence summary
author_facet Kimberly Miller
author_sort Kimberly Miller
title Graduate Students Reference Open Access Content in Literature Review Assignments
title_short Graduate Students Reference Open Access Content in Literature Review Assignments
title_full Graduate Students Reference Open Access Content in Literature Review Assignments
title_fullStr Graduate Students Reference Open Access Content in Literature Review Assignments
title_full_unstemmed Graduate Students Reference Open Access Content in Literature Review Assignments
title_sort graduate students reference open access content in literature review assignments
publisher University of Alberta
series Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
issn 1715-720X
publishDate 2015-09-01
description A Review of: Allen, E. J., & Weber, R. A. (2014). The library and the web: Graduate students’ selection of open access journals for empirical literature searches. Journal of Web Librarianship, 8(3), 243-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2014.927745 Abstract Objective – This study seeks to understand to what degree education graduate students cite open access, peer-reviewed journals in their coursework and whether patterns of open access referencing change over time. Design – Longitudinal reference list analysis. Setting – Public university in the United States of America. Subjects – Reference lists collected from final literature review papers in a graduate-level education class (n = 382). Methods – The authors collected reference lists from final literature review papers in a graduate-level education class for a nine-year time frame from the 2005 to 2013 academic years. The authors analyzed 2,594 reference entries from the 382 reference lists in the sample. The authors organized reference entries into spreadsheets for analysis, creating one spreadsheet per class section and sorting references by type (e.g., book, journal article, website, etc.) and source. The authors also created a cumulative list of journal titles that they analyzed for open access status and how often the journals appeared in the sample. Other information collected about each journal included "ISSNs, national origin, journal sponsorship, frequency and years of student usage, presence of empirical research, [and] peer review status" (p. 249). Finally, the authors organized open access journals into the following four categories based on their access method: • Category A "OA Platform and Publisher" • Category B "Publisher Only" • Category C "Delay or Hybrid from Host or Publisher" • Category D "Subscription Based, but Self Archived" (p. 249) Main Results – A total of 594 unique journals appeared in reference lists over the study period, and 11.5% (n=68) of the total were open access journals. Of the open access journals, 96% (n=65) included original research articles, and the majority (n=51) fell into Category A "OA Platform and Publisher." Nine, six, and two journal titles fell into categories B, C, and D, respectively. The authors found no pattern or change in the use of open access titles during the nine-year study period. Open access journals appeared in reference lists an average of 14 times per year with the highest usage observed in 2009. Conclusion – The results show that graduate students in the sample used a range of open access journals. The presence of open access resources in reference lists signals that students may use both library subscription databases and open web search tools to complete their literature review assignments. The authors suggest potential reasons why open access use did not grow during the study period, including a possible mismatch between student research interests and the topics present in open access titles, the lack of discussion about open access publishing during library instruction, or student satisfaction with the resources provided through library-sponsored subscriptions. Librarians are encouraged to include high-quality open access resources within their catalogues or other electronic resources to increase open access discoverability and to include popular open web search tools as a means to retrieve open access materials during information literacy instruction.
topic evidence summary
url https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/24672
work_keys_str_mv AT kimberlymiller graduatestudentsreferenceopenaccesscontentinliteraturereviewassignments
_version_ 1725991442723110912