Neck and upper extremity pain in sonographers – a longitudinal study

Abstract Background Sonographers have reported a high occurrence of musculoskeletal pain for more than 25 years. Assessments of occupational risk factors have previously been based on cross-sectional surveys. The aim of this longitudinal study was to determine which factors at baseline that were ass...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jenny Gremark Simonsen, Anna Axmon, Catarina Nordander, Inger Arvidsson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-03-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-020-3096-9
id doaj-8b472c5d5b254ef4b40736ec33a6747d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8b472c5d5b254ef4b40736ec33a6747d2020-11-25T01:53:31ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742020-03-0121111110.1186/s12891-020-3096-9Neck and upper extremity pain in sonographers – a longitudinal studyJenny Gremark Simonsen0Anna Axmon1Catarina Nordander2Inger Arvidsson3Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund UniversityDivision of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, EPI@LUND (Epidemiology, Population studies, and Infrastructures at Lund University), Lund UniversityDivision of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, EPI@LUND (Epidemiology, Population studies, and Infrastructures at Lund University), Lund UniversityDivision of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, EPI@LUND (Epidemiology, Population studies, and Infrastructures at Lund University), Lund UniversityAbstract Background Sonographers have reported a high occurrence of musculoskeletal pain for more than 25 years. Assessments of occupational risk factors have previously been based on cross-sectional surveys. The aim of this longitudinal study was to determine which factors at baseline that were associated with neck/shoulder and elbow/hand pain at follow-up. Methods A questionnaire was answered by 248 female sonographers at baseline and follow-up (85% of the original cohort). 208 were included in the analyses. Physical, visual, and psychosocial work-related conditions were assessed at baseline. Pain in two body regions (neck/shoulders and elbows/hands) was assessed at both baseline and follow up. Results Pain at baseline showed the strongest association with pain at follow-up in both body regions [prevalence ratio (PR) 2.04; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.50–2.76], for neck/shoulders and (PR 3.45; CI 2.29–5.22) for elbows/hands. Neck/shoulder pain at follow-up was associated with inability of ergonomic adjustments at the ultrasound device (PR 1.25; CI 1.05–1.49), a high mechanical exposure index (PR 1.66; CI 1.09–2.52), and adverse visual conditions (PR 1.24; CI 1.00–1.54) at baseline. Moreover, among participants with no neck/shoulder pain at baseline, high job demands (PR 1.78; CI 1.01–3.12), and a high mechanical exposure index (PR 2.0; CI 0.98–4.14) predicted pain at follow-up. Pain in the elbows/hands at follow-up was associated with high sensory demands at baseline (PR 1.63; CI 1.08–2.45), and among participants without pain at baseline high sensory demands predicted elbow/hand pain at follow-up (PR 3.34; CI 1.53–7.31). Conclusion Pain at baseline was the strongest predictor for pain at follow-up in both body regions. We also found several occupational factors at baseline that were associated with pain at follow-up: inability to adjust equipment, adverse visual conditions, a high MEI, high job demands and high sensory demands. These results point at a possibility to influence pain with better ergonomics.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-020-3096-9Diagnostic imagingPhysicalPsychosocialVisual ergonomicsWomenWorking conditions
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jenny Gremark Simonsen
Anna Axmon
Catarina Nordander
Inger Arvidsson
spellingShingle Jenny Gremark Simonsen
Anna Axmon
Catarina Nordander
Inger Arvidsson
Neck and upper extremity pain in sonographers – a longitudinal study
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Diagnostic imaging
Physical
Psychosocial
Visual ergonomics
Women
Working conditions
author_facet Jenny Gremark Simonsen
Anna Axmon
Catarina Nordander
Inger Arvidsson
author_sort Jenny Gremark Simonsen
title Neck and upper extremity pain in sonographers – a longitudinal study
title_short Neck and upper extremity pain in sonographers – a longitudinal study
title_full Neck and upper extremity pain in sonographers – a longitudinal study
title_fullStr Neck and upper extremity pain in sonographers – a longitudinal study
title_full_unstemmed Neck and upper extremity pain in sonographers – a longitudinal study
title_sort neck and upper extremity pain in sonographers – a longitudinal study
publisher BMC
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
issn 1471-2474
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Abstract Background Sonographers have reported a high occurrence of musculoskeletal pain for more than 25 years. Assessments of occupational risk factors have previously been based on cross-sectional surveys. The aim of this longitudinal study was to determine which factors at baseline that were associated with neck/shoulder and elbow/hand pain at follow-up. Methods A questionnaire was answered by 248 female sonographers at baseline and follow-up (85% of the original cohort). 208 were included in the analyses. Physical, visual, and psychosocial work-related conditions were assessed at baseline. Pain in two body regions (neck/shoulders and elbows/hands) was assessed at both baseline and follow up. Results Pain at baseline showed the strongest association with pain at follow-up in both body regions [prevalence ratio (PR) 2.04; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.50–2.76], for neck/shoulders and (PR 3.45; CI 2.29–5.22) for elbows/hands. Neck/shoulder pain at follow-up was associated with inability of ergonomic adjustments at the ultrasound device (PR 1.25; CI 1.05–1.49), a high mechanical exposure index (PR 1.66; CI 1.09–2.52), and adverse visual conditions (PR 1.24; CI 1.00–1.54) at baseline. Moreover, among participants with no neck/shoulder pain at baseline, high job demands (PR 1.78; CI 1.01–3.12), and a high mechanical exposure index (PR 2.0; CI 0.98–4.14) predicted pain at follow-up. Pain in the elbows/hands at follow-up was associated with high sensory demands at baseline (PR 1.63; CI 1.08–2.45), and among participants without pain at baseline high sensory demands predicted elbow/hand pain at follow-up (PR 3.34; CI 1.53–7.31). Conclusion Pain at baseline was the strongest predictor for pain at follow-up in both body regions. We also found several occupational factors at baseline that were associated with pain at follow-up: inability to adjust equipment, adverse visual conditions, a high MEI, high job demands and high sensory demands. These results point at a possibility to influence pain with better ergonomics.
topic Diagnostic imaging
Physical
Psychosocial
Visual ergonomics
Women
Working conditions
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-020-3096-9
work_keys_str_mv AT jennygremarksimonsen neckandupperextremitypaininsonographersalongitudinalstudy
AT annaaxmon neckandupperextremitypaininsonographersalongitudinalstudy
AT catarinanordander neckandupperextremitypaininsonographersalongitudinalstudy
AT ingerarvidsson neckandupperextremitypaininsonographersalongitudinalstudy
_version_ 1724990492498722816