How survival curves affect populations' vulnerability to climate change.

Human activities are exposing organisms not only to direct threats (e.g. habitat loss) but also to indirect environmental pressures such as climate change, which involves not just directional global warming but also increasing climatic variability. Such changes will impact whole communities of organ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John M Halley, Kyle S Van Houtan, Nate Mantua
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6126862?pdf=render
id doaj-8b54bae2a11341ac994da56696933626
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8b54bae2a11341ac994da566969336262020-11-25T01:58:56ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01139e020312410.1371/journal.pone.0203124How survival curves affect populations' vulnerability to climate change.John M HalleyKyle S Van HoutanNate MantuaHuman activities are exposing organisms not only to direct threats (e.g. habitat loss) but also to indirect environmental pressures such as climate change, which involves not just directional global warming but also increasing climatic variability. Such changes will impact whole communities of organisms and the possible effects on population dynamics have raised concerns about increased extinction rates. Conservation-minded approaches to extinction risk vary from range shifts predicted by climate envelope models with no population dynamics to population viability analyses that ignore environmental variability altogether. Our modelling study shows that these extremes are modelling responses to a spectrum of environmental sensitivity that organisms may exhibit. We show how the survival curve plays a major role in how environmental variability leads to population fluctuations. While it is often supposed that low-fecundity organisms (those with high parental investment) will be the most vulnerable to climate change, it is those with high fecundity (low parental investment) that are likely to be more sensitive to such changes. We also find that abundance variations in high fecundity populations is driven primarily by fluctuations in the survival of early life stages, the more so if those environmental changes are autocorrelated in time. We show which types of conservation actions are most appropriate for a number of real populations. While the most effective conservation actions for organisms of low fecundity is to avoid killing them, for populations with high fecundity (and low parental investment), our study suggests conservation should focus more on protecting early life stages from hostile environments.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6126862?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John M Halley
Kyle S Van Houtan
Nate Mantua
spellingShingle John M Halley
Kyle S Van Houtan
Nate Mantua
How survival curves affect populations' vulnerability to climate change.
PLoS ONE
author_facet John M Halley
Kyle S Van Houtan
Nate Mantua
author_sort John M Halley
title How survival curves affect populations' vulnerability to climate change.
title_short How survival curves affect populations' vulnerability to climate change.
title_full How survival curves affect populations' vulnerability to climate change.
title_fullStr How survival curves affect populations' vulnerability to climate change.
title_full_unstemmed How survival curves affect populations' vulnerability to climate change.
title_sort how survival curves affect populations' vulnerability to climate change.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Human activities are exposing organisms not only to direct threats (e.g. habitat loss) but also to indirect environmental pressures such as climate change, which involves not just directional global warming but also increasing climatic variability. Such changes will impact whole communities of organisms and the possible effects on population dynamics have raised concerns about increased extinction rates. Conservation-minded approaches to extinction risk vary from range shifts predicted by climate envelope models with no population dynamics to population viability analyses that ignore environmental variability altogether. Our modelling study shows that these extremes are modelling responses to a spectrum of environmental sensitivity that organisms may exhibit. We show how the survival curve plays a major role in how environmental variability leads to population fluctuations. While it is often supposed that low-fecundity organisms (those with high parental investment) will be the most vulnerable to climate change, it is those with high fecundity (low parental investment) that are likely to be more sensitive to such changes. We also find that abundance variations in high fecundity populations is driven primarily by fluctuations in the survival of early life stages, the more so if those environmental changes are autocorrelated in time. We show which types of conservation actions are most appropriate for a number of real populations. While the most effective conservation actions for organisms of low fecundity is to avoid killing them, for populations with high fecundity (and low parental investment), our study suggests conservation should focus more on protecting early life stages from hostile environments.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6126862?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT johnmhalley howsurvivalcurvesaffectpopulationsvulnerabilitytoclimatechange
AT kylesvanhoutan howsurvivalcurvesaffectpopulationsvulnerabilitytoclimatechange
AT natemantua howsurvivalcurvesaffectpopulationsvulnerabilitytoclimatechange
_version_ 1724967002200604672