QoS Performance Analysis of Some Routing Protocols in MANET

Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) is introduced for vital situations where the infrastructure or wireless networks fails to provide a connectiOD. during natural disasters and wars. This is because MANET is an independent network that relies on its own battery power for routing packets. In this paper, we...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hemin Akram Muhammad, Tara Ali Yahiya, Pinar Kirci, Derya Yiltas-Kaplan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: FRUCT 2016-11-01
Series:Proceedings of the XXth Conference of Open Innovations Association FRUCT
Subjects:
QoS
Online Access:https://fruct.org/publications/abstract19/files/Muh.pdf
id doaj-8c00cff33f964eb0829c0f8a0130df98
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8c00cff33f964eb0829c0f8a0130df982020-11-24T22:52:40ZengFRUCTProceedings of the XXth Conference of Open Innovations Association FRUCT2305-72542343-07372016-11-0142019351357QoS Performance Analysis of Some Routing Protocols in MANETHemin Akram Muhammad0Tara Ali Yahiya1Pinar Kirci2Derya Yiltas-Kaplan3University of Kurdistan-Hawler, Erbil,IraqUniversity of Kurdistan-Hawler, Erbil,IraqIstanbul University, Istanbul, TurkeyIstanbul University, Istanbul, TurkeyMobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) is introduced for vital situations where the infrastructure or wireless networks fails to provide a connectiOD. during natural disasters and wars. This is because MANET is an independent network that relies on its own battery power for routing packets. In this paper, we eumined the Quality of Service (Q) parameters for two types of routing protocols; namely reactive and proactive protocols. In this study, we bandied the Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) and Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) protocols as the reactive protocols. On the other hand, we used the Destination­ Sequenced Distance Vector (DSDV) and Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) protocols as the proactive protocols. We considered the throughput, end-te>-end delay and packet delivery ratio as the Q parameters. We carried out dift'erent scenarios where the network area size, network density, speed, and pause time were changed. We run the NS2 simulator to execute the performance of these scenarios through some numerical results.https://fruct.org/publications/abstract19/files/Muh.pdfAdHocQoSRouting
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hemin Akram Muhammad
Tara Ali Yahiya
Pinar Kirci
Derya Yiltas-Kaplan
spellingShingle Hemin Akram Muhammad
Tara Ali Yahiya
Pinar Kirci
Derya Yiltas-Kaplan
QoS Performance Analysis of Some Routing Protocols in MANET
Proceedings of the XXth Conference of Open Innovations Association FRUCT
AdHoc
QoS
Routing
author_facet Hemin Akram Muhammad
Tara Ali Yahiya
Pinar Kirci
Derya Yiltas-Kaplan
author_sort Hemin Akram Muhammad
title QoS Performance Analysis of Some Routing Protocols in MANET
title_short QoS Performance Analysis of Some Routing Protocols in MANET
title_full QoS Performance Analysis of Some Routing Protocols in MANET
title_fullStr QoS Performance Analysis of Some Routing Protocols in MANET
title_full_unstemmed QoS Performance Analysis of Some Routing Protocols in MANET
title_sort qos performance analysis of some routing protocols in manet
publisher FRUCT
series Proceedings of the XXth Conference of Open Innovations Association FRUCT
issn 2305-7254
2343-0737
publishDate 2016-11-01
description Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) is introduced for vital situations where the infrastructure or wireless networks fails to provide a connectiOD. during natural disasters and wars. This is because MANET is an independent network that relies on its own battery power for routing packets. In this paper, we eumined the Quality of Service (Q) parameters for two types of routing protocols; namely reactive and proactive protocols. In this study, we bandied the Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) and Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) protocols as the reactive protocols. On the other hand, we used the Destination­ Sequenced Distance Vector (DSDV) and Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) protocols as the proactive protocols. We considered the throughput, end-te>-end delay and packet delivery ratio as the Q parameters. We carried out dift'erent scenarios where the network area size, network density, speed, and pause time were changed. We run the NS2 simulator to execute the performance of these scenarios through some numerical results.
topic AdHoc
QoS
Routing
url https://fruct.org/publications/abstract19/files/Muh.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT heminakrammuhammad qosperformanceanalysisofsomeroutingprotocolsinmanet
AT taraaliyahiya qosperformanceanalysisofsomeroutingprotocolsinmanet
AT pinarkirci qosperformanceanalysisofsomeroutingprotocolsinmanet
AT deryayiltaskaplan qosperformanceanalysisofsomeroutingprotocolsinmanet
_version_ 1725665109240446976