Water Use and Rice Productivity for Irrigation Management Alternatives in Tanzania

Rice production is important for global food security but given its large water footprint, efficient irrigation management strategies need to be developed. Expansion of rice growing area is larger than any other crop in Africa due to increasing demand for rice. Three rice irrigation management alter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stanslaus Terengia Materu, Sanjay Shukla, Rajendra P. Sishodia, Andrew Tarimo, Siza D. Tumbo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-08-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/10/8/1018
id doaj-8c2bc77720304dd892c3f54a2481ac2a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8c2bc77720304dd892c3f54a2481ac2a2020-11-25T01:41:16ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412018-08-01108101810.3390/w10081018w10081018Water Use and Rice Productivity for Irrigation Management Alternatives in TanzaniaStanslaus Terengia Materu0Sanjay Shukla1Rajendra P. Sishodia2Andrew Tarimo3Siza D. Tumbo4Department of Engineering Sciences and Technology, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P. O. Box 3003, Chuo Kikuu, Morogoro, TanzaniaAgricultural and Biological Engineering Department, University of Florida, 2685 State Road 29 N, Immokalee, FL 34142, USAAgricultural and Biological Engineering Department, University of Florida, 2685 State Road 29 N, Immokalee, FL 34142, USADepartment of Engineering Sciences and Technology, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P. O. Box 3003, Chuo Kikuu, Morogoro, TanzaniaDepartment of Engineering Sciences and Technology, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P. O. Box 3003, Chuo Kikuu, Morogoro, TanzaniaRice production is important for global food security but given its large water footprint, efficient irrigation management strategies need to be developed. Expansion of rice growing area is larger than any other crop in Africa due to increasing demand for rice. Three rice irrigation management alternatives with the system of rice intensification (SRI) were field-evaluated against the conventional continuously flooded system (CF) in Tanzania. Production systems included: (1) CF (50 mm ponding depth for the entire season); (2) SRI (40 mm ponding for 3 days and no irrigation for next 5 days); (3) 80% SRI (80% of the SRI ponding); and (4) 50% SRI (50% of the SRI ponding). Experimental evaluation of the four systems was conducted for both wet and dry seasons. For the dry season, the SRI and 80% SRI produced higher yields of 9.68 tons/ha and 11.45 tons/ha and saved 26% and 35% of water, respectively compared to the CF (8.69 tons/ha). The yield advantage of the 80% SRI and SRI over the CF was less during the wet season with 6.01 tons/ha and 5.99 tons/ha of production, and water savings of 30% and 14%, respectively compared to the CF (5.64 tons/ha). The 50% SRI had lowest yield of all for both seasons, 7.48 tons/ha and 4.99 tons/ha for the dry and wet seasons, respectively. Statistically, the 80% SRI treatment outperformed all other treatments over the two seasons with an additional yield of 1.57 tons/ha and 33% (345 mm) water savings compared to the CF. Economic productivity of water (US$/ha-cm) over two seasons was highest for the 80% SRI ($20.27/ha-cm), while it was lowest for the CF ($12.89/ha-cm). Water saved by converting from the CF to the 80% SRI (1.98 million ha-cm) can support a 50% expansion in the current rice irrigated area in Tanzania. Even without irrigation expansion, the 80% SRI can increase rice production by 1.5 million tons annually while enhancing water availability for industrial and environmental uses (e.g., ecological preserves) and help achieve food security in Tanzania and the greater sub-Saharan Africa.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/10/8/1018Africadeficit irrigationfood securitysystem of rice intensificationwater conservationwater productivity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stanslaus Terengia Materu
Sanjay Shukla
Rajendra P. Sishodia
Andrew Tarimo
Siza D. Tumbo
spellingShingle Stanslaus Terengia Materu
Sanjay Shukla
Rajendra P. Sishodia
Andrew Tarimo
Siza D. Tumbo
Water Use and Rice Productivity for Irrigation Management Alternatives in Tanzania
Water
Africa
deficit irrigation
food security
system of rice intensification
water conservation
water productivity
author_facet Stanslaus Terengia Materu
Sanjay Shukla
Rajendra P. Sishodia
Andrew Tarimo
Siza D. Tumbo
author_sort Stanslaus Terengia Materu
title Water Use and Rice Productivity for Irrigation Management Alternatives in Tanzania
title_short Water Use and Rice Productivity for Irrigation Management Alternatives in Tanzania
title_full Water Use and Rice Productivity for Irrigation Management Alternatives in Tanzania
title_fullStr Water Use and Rice Productivity for Irrigation Management Alternatives in Tanzania
title_full_unstemmed Water Use and Rice Productivity for Irrigation Management Alternatives in Tanzania
title_sort water use and rice productivity for irrigation management alternatives in tanzania
publisher MDPI AG
series Water
issn 2073-4441
publishDate 2018-08-01
description Rice production is important for global food security but given its large water footprint, efficient irrigation management strategies need to be developed. Expansion of rice growing area is larger than any other crop in Africa due to increasing demand for rice. Three rice irrigation management alternatives with the system of rice intensification (SRI) were field-evaluated against the conventional continuously flooded system (CF) in Tanzania. Production systems included: (1) CF (50 mm ponding depth for the entire season); (2) SRI (40 mm ponding for 3 days and no irrigation for next 5 days); (3) 80% SRI (80% of the SRI ponding); and (4) 50% SRI (50% of the SRI ponding). Experimental evaluation of the four systems was conducted for both wet and dry seasons. For the dry season, the SRI and 80% SRI produced higher yields of 9.68 tons/ha and 11.45 tons/ha and saved 26% and 35% of water, respectively compared to the CF (8.69 tons/ha). The yield advantage of the 80% SRI and SRI over the CF was less during the wet season with 6.01 tons/ha and 5.99 tons/ha of production, and water savings of 30% and 14%, respectively compared to the CF (5.64 tons/ha). The 50% SRI had lowest yield of all for both seasons, 7.48 tons/ha and 4.99 tons/ha for the dry and wet seasons, respectively. Statistically, the 80% SRI treatment outperformed all other treatments over the two seasons with an additional yield of 1.57 tons/ha and 33% (345 mm) water savings compared to the CF. Economic productivity of water (US$/ha-cm) over two seasons was highest for the 80% SRI ($20.27/ha-cm), while it was lowest for the CF ($12.89/ha-cm). Water saved by converting from the CF to the 80% SRI (1.98 million ha-cm) can support a 50% expansion in the current rice irrigated area in Tanzania. Even without irrigation expansion, the 80% SRI can increase rice production by 1.5 million tons annually while enhancing water availability for industrial and environmental uses (e.g., ecological preserves) and help achieve food security in Tanzania and the greater sub-Saharan Africa.
topic Africa
deficit irrigation
food security
system of rice intensification
water conservation
water productivity
url http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/10/8/1018
work_keys_str_mv AT stanslausterengiamateru wateruseandriceproductivityforirrigationmanagementalternativesintanzania
AT sanjayshukla wateruseandriceproductivityforirrigationmanagementalternativesintanzania
AT rajendrapsishodia wateruseandriceproductivityforirrigationmanagementalternativesintanzania
AT andrewtarimo wateruseandriceproductivityforirrigationmanagementalternativesintanzania
AT sizadtumbo wateruseandriceproductivityforirrigationmanagementalternativesintanzania
_version_ 1725041734611632128