Attentional Decoupling while Pursuing Intentions: A Form of Mind Wandering?
In the current study, participants performed an ongoing lexical decision task (LDT) in which they had to classify letter strings as words or nonwords. In intention conditions, they also had to encode a postponed intention to remember to make a different response if a pre-specified cue appeared. Att...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013-10-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00693/full |
id |
doaj-8c418c6475e54382816492f089643dba |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8c418c6475e54382816492f089643dba2020-11-24T20:56:50ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782013-10-01410.3389/fpsyg.2013.0069357133Attentional Decoupling while Pursuing Intentions: A Form of Mind Wandering?Anna-Lisa eCohen0Yeshiva UniversityIn the current study, participants performed an ongoing lexical decision task (LDT) in which they had to classify letter strings as words or nonwords. In intention conditions, they also had to encode a postponed intention to remember to make a different response if a pre-specified cue appeared. Attempting to replicate an important finding from Cohen, Jaudas, and Gollwitzer (2008), the interest was in examining how varying cognitive load associated with an intention influences attention to the ongoing task (measured by reaction times). Typically, disengaging from a primary task is perceived as negative as it can lead to performance decrements; however, if disengaging from a primary task helps one to accomplish a desired future goal, then these attentional shifts may in fact be constructive. Results replicated those of Cohen et al. (2008) and showed that participants were very flexible in how they managed attention in the ongoing lexical decision task. Reaction time costs emerged when cognitive load was high and solely for word trials (i.e., not for nonword trials). The implications for mind wandering are that, while our attention may wander when stimuli are present that trigger a suspended or unfulfilled goal, we are better able to stay on task when the stimuli are less goal relevant. Therefore, the decoupling process (e.g., Schooler et al., 2011) might be initiated when postponed goals are accompanied by a high degree of cognitive load and when external stimuli are present that relate to that goal.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00693/fullmind wanderingprospective memorymemory for intentionsmanaging attentionongoing task costs |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Anna-Lisa eCohen |
spellingShingle |
Anna-Lisa eCohen Attentional Decoupling while Pursuing Intentions: A Form of Mind Wandering? Frontiers in Psychology mind wandering prospective memory memory for intentions managing attention ongoing task costs |
author_facet |
Anna-Lisa eCohen |
author_sort |
Anna-Lisa eCohen |
title |
Attentional Decoupling while Pursuing Intentions: A Form of Mind Wandering? |
title_short |
Attentional Decoupling while Pursuing Intentions: A Form of Mind Wandering? |
title_full |
Attentional Decoupling while Pursuing Intentions: A Form of Mind Wandering? |
title_fullStr |
Attentional Decoupling while Pursuing Intentions: A Form of Mind Wandering? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Attentional Decoupling while Pursuing Intentions: A Form of Mind Wandering? |
title_sort |
attentional decoupling while pursuing intentions: a form of mind wandering? |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2013-10-01 |
description |
In the current study, participants performed an ongoing lexical decision task (LDT) in which they had to classify letter strings as words or nonwords. In intention conditions, they also had to encode a postponed intention to remember to make a different response if a pre-specified cue appeared. Attempting to replicate an important finding from Cohen, Jaudas, and Gollwitzer (2008), the interest was in examining how varying cognitive load associated with an intention influences attention to the ongoing task (measured by reaction times). Typically, disengaging from a primary task is perceived as negative as it can lead to performance decrements; however, if disengaging from a primary task helps one to accomplish a desired future goal, then these attentional shifts may in fact be constructive. Results replicated those of Cohen et al. (2008) and showed that participants were very flexible in how they managed attention in the ongoing lexical decision task. Reaction time costs emerged when cognitive load was high and solely for word trials (i.e., not for nonword trials). The implications for mind wandering are that, while our attention may wander when stimuli are present that trigger a suspended or unfulfilled goal, we are better able to stay on task when the stimuli are less goal relevant. Therefore, the decoupling process (e.g., Schooler et al., 2011) might be initiated when postponed goals are accompanied by a high degree of cognitive load and when external stimuli are present that relate to that goal. |
topic |
mind wandering prospective memory memory for intentions managing attention ongoing task costs |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00693/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT annalisaecohen attentionaldecouplingwhilepursuingintentionsaformofmindwandering |
_version_ |
1716789512832548864 |