Attentional Decoupling while Pursuing Intentions: A Form of Mind Wandering?

In the current study, participants performed an ongoing lexical decision task (LDT) in which they had to classify letter strings as words or nonwords. In intention conditions, they also had to encode a postponed intention to remember to make a different response if a pre-specified cue appeared. Att...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anna-Lisa eCohen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00693/full
id doaj-8c418c6475e54382816492f089643dba
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8c418c6475e54382816492f089643dba2020-11-24T20:56:50ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782013-10-01410.3389/fpsyg.2013.0069357133Attentional Decoupling while Pursuing Intentions: A Form of Mind Wandering?Anna-Lisa eCohen0Yeshiva UniversityIn the current study, participants performed an ongoing lexical decision task (LDT) in which they had to classify letter strings as words or nonwords. In intention conditions, they also had to encode a postponed intention to remember to make a different response if a pre-specified cue appeared. Attempting to replicate an important finding from Cohen, Jaudas, and Gollwitzer (2008), the interest was in examining how varying cognitive load associated with an intention influences attention to the ongoing task (measured by reaction times). Typically, disengaging from a primary task is perceived as negative as it can lead to performance decrements; however, if disengaging from a primary task helps one to accomplish a desired future goal, then these attentional shifts may in fact be constructive. Results replicated those of Cohen et al. (2008) and showed that participants were very flexible in how they managed attention in the ongoing lexical decision task. Reaction time costs emerged when cognitive load was high and solely for word trials (i.e., not for nonword trials). The implications for mind wandering are that, while our attention may wander when stimuli are present that trigger a suspended or unfulfilled goal, we are better able to stay on task when the stimuli are less goal relevant. Therefore, the decoupling process (e.g., Schooler et al., 2011) might be initiated when postponed goals are accompanied by a high degree of cognitive load and when external stimuli are present that relate to that goal.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00693/fullmind wanderingprospective memorymemory for intentionsmanaging attentionongoing task costs
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anna-Lisa eCohen
spellingShingle Anna-Lisa eCohen
Attentional Decoupling while Pursuing Intentions: A Form of Mind Wandering?
Frontiers in Psychology
mind wandering
prospective memory
memory for intentions
managing attention
ongoing task costs
author_facet Anna-Lisa eCohen
author_sort Anna-Lisa eCohen
title Attentional Decoupling while Pursuing Intentions: A Form of Mind Wandering?
title_short Attentional Decoupling while Pursuing Intentions: A Form of Mind Wandering?
title_full Attentional Decoupling while Pursuing Intentions: A Form of Mind Wandering?
title_fullStr Attentional Decoupling while Pursuing Intentions: A Form of Mind Wandering?
title_full_unstemmed Attentional Decoupling while Pursuing Intentions: A Form of Mind Wandering?
title_sort attentional decoupling while pursuing intentions: a form of mind wandering?
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2013-10-01
description In the current study, participants performed an ongoing lexical decision task (LDT) in which they had to classify letter strings as words or nonwords. In intention conditions, they also had to encode a postponed intention to remember to make a different response if a pre-specified cue appeared. Attempting to replicate an important finding from Cohen, Jaudas, and Gollwitzer (2008), the interest was in examining how varying cognitive load associated with an intention influences attention to the ongoing task (measured by reaction times). Typically, disengaging from a primary task is perceived as negative as it can lead to performance decrements; however, if disengaging from a primary task helps one to accomplish a desired future goal, then these attentional shifts may in fact be constructive. Results replicated those of Cohen et al. (2008) and showed that participants were very flexible in how they managed attention in the ongoing lexical decision task. Reaction time costs emerged when cognitive load was high and solely for word trials (i.e., not for nonword trials). The implications for mind wandering are that, while our attention may wander when stimuli are present that trigger a suspended or unfulfilled goal, we are better able to stay on task when the stimuli are less goal relevant. Therefore, the decoupling process (e.g., Schooler et al., 2011) might be initiated when postponed goals are accompanied by a high degree of cognitive load and when external stimuli are present that relate to that goal.
topic mind wandering
prospective memory
memory for intentions
managing attention
ongoing task costs
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00693/full
work_keys_str_mv AT annalisaecohen attentionaldecouplingwhilepursuingintentionsaformofmindwandering
_version_ 1716789512832548864