Sept programmes normatifs pour une sociologie critique des inégalités

Any critical sociology assumes a reference to a normative horizon based on the defense of critical positions. This normative horizon remains sometimes, or even often, implicit probably because its explanation seems to infringe the imperative of axiological neutrality which strongly influences social...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jean-Louis Genard
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Association Internationale des Sociologues de Langue Française 2012-05-01
Series:Sociologies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/sociologies/3927
id doaj-8c5e7a792b1143f096ec1b32fe83a035
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8c5e7a792b1143f096ec1b32fe83a0352020-11-24T23:12:03ZfraAssociation Internationale des Sociologues de Langue FrançaiseSociologies1992-26552012-05-01Sept programmes normatifs pour une sociologie critique des inégalitésJean-Louis GenardAny critical sociology assumes a reference to a normative horizon based on the defense of critical positions. This normative horizon remains sometimes, or even often, implicit probably because its explanation seems to infringe the imperative of axiological neutrality which strongly influences social sciences’ epistemology, or at the very least because it drags the works of the sociologist on the field of political theory or activism. This contribution rather seeks to make explicit these normative horizons regarding the case of, central to critical sociology, social inequalities. Seven normative paradigms are thus identified, articulated, and linked to current issues related to justice theories. Their differentiation is built mainly from discussions on anthropological references that serve as critical supports (is autonomy the anthropological ideal of a fair society or is it vulnerability? What is autonomy?), on conceptions of justice (should equality be thought of as equal treatment, resources, opportunities…? Should it be thought of as redistribution or recognition?), on ways to consider the collectivization of responsibility (how far do we undertake the right to difference? Should it include future generations?), and on how to define what a good life is (should we challenge the relationship between autonomy and anticipation? Shouldn’t the aims of equality question firstly our conceptions inherited from the good life that were engulfed by consumption and waste?).http://journals.openedition.org/sociologies/3927epistemologynormative horizoninequalitiescritical sociologyjustice theories
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jean-Louis Genard
spellingShingle Jean-Louis Genard
Sept programmes normatifs pour une sociologie critique des inégalités
Sociologies
epistemology
normative horizon
inequalities
critical sociology
justice theories
author_facet Jean-Louis Genard
author_sort Jean-Louis Genard
title Sept programmes normatifs pour une sociologie critique des inégalités
title_short Sept programmes normatifs pour une sociologie critique des inégalités
title_full Sept programmes normatifs pour une sociologie critique des inégalités
title_fullStr Sept programmes normatifs pour une sociologie critique des inégalités
title_full_unstemmed Sept programmes normatifs pour une sociologie critique des inégalités
title_sort sept programmes normatifs pour une sociologie critique des inégalités
publisher Association Internationale des Sociologues de Langue Française
series Sociologies
issn 1992-2655
publishDate 2012-05-01
description Any critical sociology assumes a reference to a normative horizon based on the defense of critical positions. This normative horizon remains sometimes, or even often, implicit probably because its explanation seems to infringe the imperative of axiological neutrality which strongly influences social sciences’ epistemology, or at the very least because it drags the works of the sociologist on the field of political theory or activism. This contribution rather seeks to make explicit these normative horizons regarding the case of, central to critical sociology, social inequalities. Seven normative paradigms are thus identified, articulated, and linked to current issues related to justice theories. Their differentiation is built mainly from discussions on anthropological references that serve as critical supports (is autonomy the anthropological ideal of a fair society or is it vulnerability? What is autonomy?), on conceptions of justice (should equality be thought of as equal treatment, resources, opportunities…? Should it be thought of as redistribution or recognition?), on ways to consider the collectivization of responsibility (how far do we undertake the right to difference? Should it include future generations?), and on how to define what a good life is (should we challenge the relationship between autonomy and anticipation? Shouldn’t the aims of equality question firstly our conceptions inherited from the good life that were engulfed by consumption and waste?).
topic epistemology
normative horizon
inequalities
critical sociology
justice theories
url http://journals.openedition.org/sociologies/3927
work_keys_str_mv AT jeanlouisgenard septprogrammesnormatifspourunesociologiecritiquedesinegalites
_version_ 1725602592306757632