INVESTMENTS NON GRATAE: INFORMAL RESTRICTIONS ON CAPITAL FLOWS IN THE ЕURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION (EURASEC) MEMBER COUNTRIES

The article focuses on the problems of investment cooperation between the EurAsEC countries caused by informal restrictions on the movement of capital. An analysis of investment activities of foreign companies in the markets of these countries allows to reveal at least seven types of informal constr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: M. M. Lobanov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Government of the Russian Federation, Financial University 2017-10-01
Series:Финансы: теория и практика
Subjects:
Online Access:https://financetp.fa.ru/jour/article/view/414
id doaj-8c60d3a51b1d442f86eeec5fde697c4a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8c60d3a51b1d442f86eeec5fde697c4a2021-07-28T16:22:45ZrusGovernment of the Russian Federation, Financial University Финансы: теория и практика2587-56712587-70892017-10-01203909910.26794/2587-5671-2016-20-3-90-99451INVESTMENTS NON GRATAE: INFORMAL RESTRICTIONS ON CAPITAL FLOWS IN THE ЕURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION (EURASEC) MEMBER COUNTRIESM. M. Lobanov0RAS Institute of EconomicsThe article focuses on the problems of investment cooperation between the EurAsEC countries caused by informal restrictions on the movement of capital. An analysis of investment activities of foreign companies in the markets of these countries allows to reveal at least seven types of informal constraints (introduced under the influence of various factors) which impact on the interaction between recipients and donors of capital. In this context, the author evaluates the prospects of creating conditions for the free movement of capital within the EurAsEC and proposes measures to remove barriers to foreign investment. It is noted that irrational bureaucratic management is another barrier to foreign investment and it is often mentioned by entrepreneurs as one of the main investment risks. The negative impact of bureaucracy on the company's work can take on various forms: from incompetence in making decisions to direct intervention in business processes. Also, a very common practice in business is changing “the rules of the game”. For example, before signing investment agreements, foreign companies count to obtain benefits and preferences which can be eliminated later, in the process of project implementation. In this case, low predictability of decisions and actions of the authorities acts as an informal barrier to investment.https://financetp.fa.ru/jour/article/view/414eurasecrussiabelaruskazakhstan, cross-border movement of capitaldirect foreign investmentsinformal constraintsbarriersprotectionisminvestment risksmergers and acquisitions
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M. M. Lobanov
spellingShingle M. M. Lobanov
INVESTMENTS NON GRATAE: INFORMAL RESTRICTIONS ON CAPITAL FLOWS IN THE ЕURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION (EURASEC) MEMBER COUNTRIES
Финансы: теория и практика
eurasec
russia
belarus
kazakhstan, cross-border movement of capital
direct foreign investments
informal constraints
barriers
protectionism
investment risks
mergers and acquisitions
author_facet M. M. Lobanov
author_sort M. M. Lobanov
title INVESTMENTS NON GRATAE: INFORMAL RESTRICTIONS ON CAPITAL FLOWS IN THE ЕURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION (EURASEC) MEMBER COUNTRIES
title_short INVESTMENTS NON GRATAE: INFORMAL RESTRICTIONS ON CAPITAL FLOWS IN THE ЕURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION (EURASEC) MEMBER COUNTRIES
title_full INVESTMENTS NON GRATAE: INFORMAL RESTRICTIONS ON CAPITAL FLOWS IN THE ЕURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION (EURASEC) MEMBER COUNTRIES
title_fullStr INVESTMENTS NON GRATAE: INFORMAL RESTRICTIONS ON CAPITAL FLOWS IN THE ЕURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION (EURASEC) MEMBER COUNTRIES
title_full_unstemmed INVESTMENTS NON GRATAE: INFORMAL RESTRICTIONS ON CAPITAL FLOWS IN THE ЕURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION (EURASEC) MEMBER COUNTRIES
title_sort investments non gratae: informal restrictions on capital flows in the еurasian economic union (eurasec) member countries
publisher Government of the Russian Federation, Financial University
series Финансы: теория и практика
issn 2587-5671
2587-7089
publishDate 2017-10-01
description The article focuses on the problems of investment cooperation between the EurAsEC countries caused by informal restrictions on the movement of capital. An analysis of investment activities of foreign companies in the markets of these countries allows to reveal at least seven types of informal constraints (introduced under the influence of various factors) which impact on the interaction between recipients and donors of capital. In this context, the author evaluates the prospects of creating conditions for the free movement of capital within the EurAsEC and proposes measures to remove barriers to foreign investment. It is noted that irrational bureaucratic management is another barrier to foreign investment and it is often mentioned by entrepreneurs as one of the main investment risks. The negative impact of bureaucracy on the company's work can take on various forms: from incompetence in making decisions to direct intervention in business processes. Also, a very common practice in business is changing “the rules of the game”. For example, before signing investment agreements, foreign companies count to obtain benefits and preferences which can be eliminated later, in the process of project implementation. In this case, low predictability of decisions and actions of the authorities acts as an informal barrier to investment.
topic eurasec
russia
belarus
kazakhstan, cross-border movement of capital
direct foreign investments
informal constraints
barriers
protectionism
investment risks
mergers and acquisitions
url https://financetp.fa.ru/jour/article/view/414
work_keys_str_mv AT mmlobanov investmentsnongrataeinformalrestrictionsoncapitalflowsintheeurasianeconomicunioneurasecmembercountries
_version_ 1721267183802122240