Group Decision-Making Method Based on Expert Classification Consensus Information Integration

Existing decision-making methods are mostly a simple aggregation of expert decision information when solving large group decision-making problems. In these methods, priority should be given to expert weight information; however, it is difficult to avoid the loss of expert decision information in the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lei Wang, Huifeng Xue
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-07-01
Series:Symmetry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/12/7/1180
id doaj-8cabad58a453473aab2818387415f75c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8cabad58a453473aab2818387415f75c2020-11-25T03:16:33ZengMDPI AGSymmetry2073-89942020-07-01121180118010.3390/sym12071180Group Decision-Making Method Based on Expert Classification Consensus Information IntegrationLei Wang0Huifeng Xue1China Academy of Aerospace Systems Science and Engineering, Beijing, ChinaChina Academy of Aerospace Systems Science and Engineering, Beijing, ChinaExisting decision-making methods are mostly a simple aggregation of expert decision information when solving large group decision-making problems. In these methods, priority should be given to expert weight information; however, it is difficult to avoid the loss of expert decision information in the decision-making process. Therefore, a new idea to solve the problem of large group decision-making by combining the expert group clustering algorithm and the group consensus model is proposed in this paper in order to avoid the disadvantages of subjectively assigning expert weights. First, expert groups are classified by the clustering algorithm of breadth-first search neighbors. Next, the decision information of the experts in the class is corrected adaptively using the group consensus model; then, expert decision information in the class is integrated using probabilistic linguistic translation methods. This method not only avoids the shortcomings of artificially given expert weights, but also reduces the loss of expert decision information. Finally, the method comprehensively considers the scale of the expert class and the difference between the classes to determine the weight of the expert class, and then it weights and integrates the consensus information of all expert classes to obtain the final decision result. This article verifies the effectiveness of the proposed method through a case analysis of urban water resource sustainability evaluation, and provides a scientific evaluation method for the sustainable development level of urban water resources.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/12/7/1180group decision-makinghesitant fuzzy linguistic term setclustering of expertsgroup consensusinformation assembly
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lei Wang
Huifeng Xue
spellingShingle Lei Wang
Huifeng Xue
Group Decision-Making Method Based on Expert Classification Consensus Information Integration
Symmetry
group decision-making
hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set
clustering of experts
group consensus
information assembly
author_facet Lei Wang
Huifeng Xue
author_sort Lei Wang
title Group Decision-Making Method Based on Expert Classification Consensus Information Integration
title_short Group Decision-Making Method Based on Expert Classification Consensus Information Integration
title_full Group Decision-Making Method Based on Expert Classification Consensus Information Integration
title_fullStr Group Decision-Making Method Based on Expert Classification Consensus Information Integration
title_full_unstemmed Group Decision-Making Method Based on Expert Classification Consensus Information Integration
title_sort group decision-making method based on expert classification consensus information integration
publisher MDPI AG
series Symmetry
issn 2073-8994
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Existing decision-making methods are mostly a simple aggregation of expert decision information when solving large group decision-making problems. In these methods, priority should be given to expert weight information; however, it is difficult to avoid the loss of expert decision information in the decision-making process. Therefore, a new idea to solve the problem of large group decision-making by combining the expert group clustering algorithm and the group consensus model is proposed in this paper in order to avoid the disadvantages of subjectively assigning expert weights. First, expert groups are classified by the clustering algorithm of breadth-first search neighbors. Next, the decision information of the experts in the class is corrected adaptively using the group consensus model; then, expert decision information in the class is integrated using probabilistic linguistic translation methods. This method not only avoids the shortcomings of artificially given expert weights, but also reduces the loss of expert decision information. Finally, the method comprehensively considers the scale of the expert class and the difference between the classes to determine the weight of the expert class, and then it weights and integrates the consensus information of all expert classes to obtain the final decision result. This article verifies the effectiveness of the proposed method through a case analysis of urban water resource sustainability evaluation, and provides a scientific evaluation method for the sustainable development level of urban water resources.
topic group decision-making
hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set
clustering of experts
group consensus
information assembly
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/12/7/1180
work_keys_str_mv AT leiwang groupdecisionmakingmethodbasedonexpertclassificationconsensusinformationintegration
AT huifengxue groupdecisionmakingmethodbasedonexpertclassificationconsensusinformationintegration
_version_ 1724635482768277504