Comparison of Sevoflurane versus Propofol under Auditory Evoked Potential Monitoring in Female Patients Undergoing Breast Surgery

Background: General anesthesia is used for most major surgeries, and the most common side effects include headache, nausea, vomiting, and sore throat. Major breast surgery is associated with a high incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). We compared the postoperative nausea and vomiti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hsiu-Pin Chen, Ya-Hui Hsu, Kuo-Chun Hua, Chih-Chung Lin, Yung-Feng Lo, Huang-Ping Yu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2013-06-01
Series:Biomedical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.biomedj.org/article.asp?issn=2319-4170;year=2013;volume=36;issue=3;spage=125;epage=131;aulast=Chen
id doaj-8caca2f85fb04dfeabf365c42b5914a5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8caca2f85fb04dfeabf365c42b5914a52021-02-02T04:35:21ZengElsevierBiomedical Journal2319-41702320-28902013-06-0136312513110.4103/2319-4170.113228Comparison of Sevoflurane versus Propofol under Auditory Evoked Potential Monitoring in Female Patients Undergoing Breast SurgeryHsiu-Pin Chen0Ya-Hui Hsu1Kuo-Chun Hua2Chih-Chung Lin3Yung-Feng Lo4Huang-Ping Yu5Department of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, TaiwanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, TaiwanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, TaiwanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, TaiwanDepartment of General Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, TaiwanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, TaiwanBackground: General anesthesia is used for most major surgeries, and the most common side effects include headache, nausea, vomiting, and sore throat. Major breast surgery is associated with a high incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). We compared the postoperative nausea and vomiting of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and sevoflurane (SEVO) anesthesia under auditory evoked potential (AEP) monitoring in female patients undergoing breast surgery. Methods: A total of 84 patients scheduled to undergo elective breast surgery from 1 to 4 h in duration from March 2011 to December 2011 were prospectively included in the study. All participants were randomly assigned to TIVA or SEVO group. The AEP index was maintained at 15-25. After completing the surgery, the duration of surgery, emergence time, and the side effects of PONV were recorded. Results: Patient characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative data, and the amounts of intraoperative analgesic drugs used were not significantly different between the TIVA and SEVO groups. The incidence of PONV was significantly higher in the SEVO group than in the TIVA group (50% and 14.3%, respectively; p < 0.001), and the total cost was significantly lower in the TIVA group than in the SEVO group (648 ± 185 and 850 ± 197, respectively). Conclusion: We observed that when compared with sevoflurane, propofol given for the maintenance of general anesthesia improves the postoperative patient well-being and reduces the incidence of PONV. Furthermore, total intravenous anesthesia with propofol resulted in significant cost reductions.http://www.biomedj.org/article.asp?issn=2319-4170;year=2013;volume=36;issue=3;spage=125;epage=131;aulast=Chenauditory evoked potentialbreast surgerypropofolsevoflurane
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hsiu-Pin Chen
Ya-Hui Hsu
Kuo-Chun Hua
Chih-Chung Lin
Yung-Feng Lo
Huang-Ping Yu
spellingShingle Hsiu-Pin Chen
Ya-Hui Hsu
Kuo-Chun Hua
Chih-Chung Lin
Yung-Feng Lo
Huang-Ping Yu
Comparison of Sevoflurane versus Propofol under Auditory Evoked Potential Monitoring in Female Patients Undergoing Breast Surgery
Biomedical Journal
auditory evoked potential
breast surgery
propofol
sevoflurane
author_facet Hsiu-Pin Chen
Ya-Hui Hsu
Kuo-Chun Hua
Chih-Chung Lin
Yung-Feng Lo
Huang-Ping Yu
author_sort Hsiu-Pin Chen
title Comparison of Sevoflurane versus Propofol under Auditory Evoked Potential Monitoring in Female Patients Undergoing Breast Surgery
title_short Comparison of Sevoflurane versus Propofol under Auditory Evoked Potential Monitoring in Female Patients Undergoing Breast Surgery
title_full Comparison of Sevoflurane versus Propofol under Auditory Evoked Potential Monitoring in Female Patients Undergoing Breast Surgery
title_fullStr Comparison of Sevoflurane versus Propofol under Auditory Evoked Potential Monitoring in Female Patients Undergoing Breast Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Sevoflurane versus Propofol under Auditory Evoked Potential Monitoring in Female Patients Undergoing Breast Surgery
title_sort comparison of sevoflurane versus propofol under auditory evoked potential monitoring in female patients undergoing breast surgery
publisher Elsevier
series Biomedical Journal
issn 2319-4170
2320-2890
publishDate 2013-06-01
description Background: General anesthesia is used for most major surgeries, and the most common side effects include headache, nausea, vomiting, and sore throat. Major breast surgery is associated with a high incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). We compared the postoperative nausea and vomiting of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and sevoflurane (SEVO) anesthesia under auditory evoked potential (AEP) monitoring in female patients undergoing breast surgery. Methods: A total of 84 patients scheduled to undergo elective breast surgery from 1 to 4 h in duration from March 2011 to December 2011 were prospectively included in the study. All participants were randomly assigned to TIVA or SEVO group. The AEP index was maintained at 15-25. After completing the surgery, the duration of surgery, emergence time, and the side effects of PONV were recorded. Results: Patient characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative data, and the amounts of intraoperative analgesic drugs used were not significantly different between the TIVA and SEVO groups. The incidence of PONV was significantly higher in the SEVO group than in the TIVA group (50% and 14.3%, respectively; p < 0.001), and the total cost was significantly lower in the TIVA group than in the SEVO group (648 ± 185 and 850 ± 197, respectively). Conclusion: We observed that when compared with sevoflurane, propofol given for the maintenance of general anesthesia improves the postoperative patient well-being and reduces the incidence of PONV. Furthermore, total intravenous anesthesia with propofol resulted in significant cost reductions.
topic auditory evoked potential
breast surgery
propofol
sevoflurane
url http://www.biomedj.org/article.asp?issn=2319-4170;year=2013;volume=36;issue=3;spage=125;epage=131;aulast=Chen
work_keys_str_mv AT hsiupinchen comparisonofsevofluraneversuspropofolunderauditoryevokedpotentialmonitoringinfemalepatientsundergoingbreastsurgery
AT yahuihsu comparisonofsevofluraneversuspropofolunderauditoryevokedpotentialmonitoringinfemalepatientsundergoingbreastsurgery
AT kuochunhua comparisonofsevofluraneversuspropofolunderauditoryevokedpotentialmonitoringinfemalepatientsundergoingbreastsurgery
AT chihchunglin comparisonofsevofluraneversuspropofolunderauditoryevokedpotentialmonitoringinfemalepatientsundergoingbreastsurgery
AT yungfenglo comparisonofsevofluraneversuspropofolunderauditoryevokedpotentialmonitoringinfemalepatientsundergoingbreastsurgery
AT huangpingyu comparisonofsevofluraneversuspropofolunderauditoryevokedpotentialmonitoringinfemalepatientsundergoingbreastsurgery
_version_ 1724305499641348096