Comments on: Validating tablet perimetry against standard Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer for glaucoma screening in Indian population

Comments on: Validating tablet perimetry against standard Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer for glaucoma screening in Indian population

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Harsh Kumar, Mithun Thulasidas
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:	Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:	http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2021;volume=69;issue=4;spage=1017;epage=1018;aulast=Kumar

Similar Items

Response to comments on: Validating tablet perimetry against standard Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer for glaucoma screening in Indian population
by: Parul Ichhpujani, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)

Validating tablet perimetry against standard Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer for glaucoma screening in Indian population
by: Parul Ichhpujani, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)

Comparison of Perimetric Outcomes from Melbourne Rapid Fields Tablet Perimeter Software and Humphrey Field Analyzer in Glaucoma Patients
by: Harsh Kumar, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Humphrey visual field and frequency doubling perimetry in the diagnosis of early glaucoma.
by: Chandrasekhar G, et al.
Published: (2003-01-01)

Mapping the Structure-Function Relationship in Glaucoma and Healthy Patients Measured with Spectralis OCT and Humphrey Perimetry
by: Laia Jaumandreu, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

Comparison of visual field test results obtained through Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry versus standard automated perimetry in healthy children
by: Sibel Kocabeyoglu, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01)

Influence of Myopia on the Humphrey Matrix Frequency Doubling Perimetry
by: Jehn-Yu Huang, et al.
Published: (2007)

Comparative Analysis of Visual Field Plotting by Octopus Interzeag 1-2-3, Humphrey Field Analyser II and Frequency Doubling Perimetry in Glaucoma Patients in South Indian Population
by: AR RAJALAKSHMI, et al.
Published: (2015-07-01)

Comparison of 30-2 Standard and Fast programs of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm of Humphrey Field Analyzer for perimetry in patients with intracranial tumors
by: Manav Deep Singh, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)

Pars plana implantation of glaucoma drainage devices - The way to succeed in refractory glaucoma
by: Harsh Kumar, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)

Glaucoma suspect & Humphrey Field Analyzer a correlation
by: P Dahal, et al.
Published: (2012-09-01)

Detection of central visual field defects in early glaucomatous eyes: Comparison of Humphrey and Octopus perimetry.
by: Gloria Roberti, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)

Home-based visual field test for glaucoma screening comparison with Humphrey perimeter
by: Tsapakis S, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01)

Comparison of Esterman disability scores obtained using Goldmann perimetry and the Humphrey field analyzer in Japanese low-vision patients.
by: Mieko Yanagisawa, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

Comparative characteristics of the standard automated perimetry and contour perimetry methods in diagnosis the initial stage of glaucoma
by: O. L. Fabrikantov, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)

Static perimetry in glaucoma
by: Khamar Bakulesh
Published: (1982-01-01)

Comparison of matrix frequency-doubling technology perimetry and standard automated perimetry in monitoring the development of visual field defects for glaucoma suspect eyes.
by: Rongrong Hu, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)

Comparison of the monocular Humphrey visual field and the binocular Humphrey esterman visual field test for driver licensing in glaucoma subjects in Sweden
by: Ayala Marcelo
Published: (2012-08-01)

Visual field assessment in glaucoma: Comparative evaluation of manual Kinetic Goldmann Perimetry and Automated Static Perimetry
by: Agarwal Harish, et al.
Published: (2000-01-01)

Long-term variability in short-wavelength automated perimetry compared to standard perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects
by: Chintan Malhotra
Published: (2009-01-01)

A comparison between the diagnostic results of short wavelength automated perimetry and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma patients
by: Ahmed H Mohamed
Published: (2016-01-01)

Static perimetry in glaucoma-an evaluation
by: Khamar Bakulesh
Published: (1983-01-01)

Improving measurements in perimetry for glaucoma
by: Bergin, Ciara
Published: (2011)

Comparison of Humphrey Field Analyzer and imo visual field test results in patients with glaucoma and pseudo-fixation loss.
by: Hiroyasu Goukon, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)

Comparison between Humphrey Field Analyzer and Micro Perimeter 1 in normal and glaucoma subjects
by: Vineet Ratra, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01)

Pars plana Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation in refractory glaucoma: Surgical technique and long-term outcomes
by: Harsh Kumar, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Visual fields interpretation in glaucoma: a focus on static automated perimetry
by: Moustafa Yaqub
Published: (2013-06-01)

New approach for the glaucoma detection with pupil perimetry
by: Ken Asakawa, et al.
Published: (2010-06-01)

Reclaiming the periphery : kinetic perimetry in patients with glaucoma
by: Moenter, V. M.
Published: (2016)

Frequency-doubling technology perimetry and multifocal visual evoked potential in glaucoma, suspected glaucoma, and control patients
by: Kanadani FN, et al.
Published: (2014-07-01)

Comparison of isolated-check visual evoked potential and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma and high-risk ocular hypertension
by: Xiang-Wu Chen, et al.
Published: (2017-04-01)

The role of standard automated perimetry and newer functional methods for glaucoma diagnosis and follow-up
by: Alencar Luciana, et al.
Published: (2011-12-01)

Response to comments on: Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease associated with anterior ischemic optic neuropathy in a young woman presenting as acute angle-closure glaucoma
by: Sagarika Patyal, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)

Short wavelength automated perimetry and standard automated perimetry in central serous chorioretinopathy
by: Han Peng Zhou, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01)

Glaucoma like defect on automated perimetry caused by cataract
by: Thomas Ravi, et al.
Published: (1996-01-01)

Expediency of the Automated Perimetry Using the Goldmann V Stimulus Size in Visually Impaired Patients with Glaucoma
by: Adriana M. Morgan, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)

Gaze-Contingent Flicker Pupil Perimetry Detects Scotomas in Patients With Cerebral Visual Impairments or Glaucoma
by: Marnix Naber, et al.
Published: (2018-07-01)

Integration and fusion of standard automated perimetry and optical coherence tomography data for improved automated glaucoma diagnostics
by: Bizios Dimitrios, et al.
Published: (2011-08-01)

Relationship between Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Standard Automated Perimetry in Healthy and Glaucoma Patients
by: Beatriz Abadia, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01)

Volume of visual field assessed with kinetic perimetry and its application to static perimetry
by: Christoforidis JB
Published: (2011-04-01)