A Multipulse Radar Signal Recognition Approach via HRF-Net Deep Learning Models

In the field of electronic countermeasure, the recognition of radar signals is extremely important. This paper uses GNU Radio and Universal Software Radio Peripherals to generate 10 classes of close-to-real multipulse radar signals, namely, Barker, Chaotic, EQFM, Frank, FSK, LFM, LOFM, OFDM, P1, and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ji Li, Huiqiang Zhang, Jianping Ou, Wei Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2021-01-01
Series:Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9955130
id doaj-8d1602d50e50485e81547769bde50d31
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8d1602d50e50485e81547769bde50d312021-06-14T00:17:34ZengHindawi LimitedComputational Intelligence and Neuroscience1687-52732021-01-01202110.1155/2021/9955130A Multipulse Radar Signal Recognition Approach via HRF-Net Deep Learning ModelsJi Li0Huiqiang Zhang1Jianping Ou2Wei Wang3School of Computer and Communication EngineeringSchool of Computer and Communication EngineeringATR Key LabSchool of Computer and Communication EngineeringIn the field of electronic countermeasure, the recognition of radar signals is extremely important. This paper uses GNU Radio and Universal Software Radio Peripherals to generate 10 classes of close-to-real multipulse radar signals, namely, Barker, Chaotic, EQFM, Frank, FSK, LFM, LOFM, OFDM, P1, and P2. In order to obtain the time-frequency image (TFI) of the multipulse radar signal, the signal is Choi–Williams distribution (CWD) transformed. Aiming at the features of the multipulse radar signal TFI, we designed a distinguishing feature fusion extraction module (DFFE) and proposed a new HRF-Net deep learning model based on this module. The model has relatively few parameters and calculations. The experiments were carried out at the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of −14 ∼ 4 dB. In the case of −6 dB, the recognition result of HRF-Net reached 99.583% and the recognition result of the network still reached 97.500% under −14 dB. Compared with other methods, HRF-Nets have relatively better generalization and robustness.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9955130
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ji Li
Huiqiang Zhang
Jianping Ou
Wei Wang
spellingShingle Ji Li
Huiqiang Zhang
Jianping Ou
Wei Wang
A Multipulse Radar Signal Recognition Approach via HRF-Net Deep Learning Models
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
author_facet Ji Li
Huiqiang Zhang
Jianping Ou
Wei Wang
author_sort Ji Li
title A Multipulse Radar Signal Recognition Approach via HRF-Net Deep Learning Models
title_short A Multipulse Radar Signal Recognition Approach via HRF-Net Deep Learning Models
title_full A Multipulse Radar Signal Recognition Approach via HRF-Net Deep Learning Models
title_fullStr A Multipulse Radar Signal Recognition Approach via HRF-Net Deep Learning Models
title_full_unstemmed A Multipulse Radar Signal Recognition Approach via HRF-Net Deep Learning Models
title_sort multipulse radar signal recognition approach via hrf-net deep learning models
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
issn 1687-5273
publishDate 2021-01-01
description In the field of electronic countermeasure, the recognition of radar signals is extremely important. This paper uses GNU Radio and Universal Software Radio Peripherals to generate 10 classes of close-to-real multipulse radar signals, namely, Barker, Chaotic, EQFM, Frank, FSK, LFM, LOFM, OFDM, P1, and P2. In order to obtain the time-frequency image (TFI) of the multipulse radar signal, the signal is Choi–Williams distribution (CWD) transformed. Aiming at the features of the multipulse radar signal TFI, we designed a distinguishing feature fusion extraction module (DFFE) and proposed a new HRF-Net deep learning model based on this module. The model has relatively few parameters and calculations. The experiments were carried out at the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of −14 ∼ 4 dB. In the case of −6 dB, the recognition result of HRF-Net reached 99.583% and the recognition result of the network still reached 97.500% under −14 dB. Compared with other methods, HRF-Nets have relatively better generalization and robustness.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9955130
work_keys_str_mv AT jili amultipulseradarsignalrecognitionapproachviahrfnetdeeplearningmodels
AT huiqiangzhang amultipulseradarsignalrecognitionapproachviahrfnetdeeplearningmodels
AT jianpingou amultipulseradarsignalrecognitionapproachviahrfnetdeeplearningmodels
AT weiwang amultipulseradarsignalrecognitionapproachviahrfnetdeeplearningmodels
AT jili multipulseradarsignalrecognitionapproachviahrfnetdeeplearningmodels
AT huiqiangzhang multipulseradarsignalrecognitionapproachviahrfnetdeeplearningmodels
AT jianpingou multipulseradarsignalrecognitionapproachviahrfnetdeeplearningmodels
AT weiwang multipulseradarsignalrecognitionapproachviahrfnetdeeplearningmodels
_version_ 1721378827628707840