An awkward relationship: the case of feminism and anthropology

This article explores some of the problems - and reactions - that arise in the dialogue between disciplinary practices and feminist theory. Certainly anthropology has interests parallel to those of feminist scholarship, but the proximity makes anthropologists’ resistance more poignant. That dissonan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marilyn Strathern
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Estadual de Londrina 2009-12-01
Series:Mediações: Revista de Ciências Sociais
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/mediacoes/article/view/4508
id doaj-8d221b10390244c992d7484ab8e64b3f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8d221b10390244c992d7484ab8e64b3f2021-04-02T13:14:12ZengUniversidade Estadual de LondrinaMediações: Revista de Ciências Sociais2176-66652009-12-011428310410.5433/2176-6665.2009v14n2p833333An awkward relationship: the case of feminism and anthropologyMarilyn Strathern0Universidade de CambridgeThis article explores some of the problems - and reactions - that arise in the dialogue between disciplinary practices and feminist theory. Certainly anthropology has interests parallel to those of feminist scholarship, but the proximity makes anthropologists’ resistance more poignant. That dissonance is actually a product of feminists’ and anthropologists’ intellectual proximity – as neighbors in tension. Practitioners of both imagine they might be overthrowing existing paradigms, and one might, in turn, expect “radical” anthropology to draw on its feminist counterpart, what does not seem to have happened. Their resistance to one another will throw light on the difference between “feminism” and “anthropology” as such.http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/mediacoes/article/view/4508FeminismoAntropologiaParadigmas.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marilyn Strathern
spellingShingle Marilyn Strathern
An awkward relationship: the case of feminism and anthropology
Mediações: Revista de Ciências Sociais
Feminismo
Antropologia
Paradigmas.
author_facet Marilyn Strathern
author_sort Marilyn Strathern
title An awkward relationship: the case of feminism and anthropology
title_short An awkward relationship: the case of feminism and anthropology
title_full An awkward relationship: the case of feminism and anthropology
title_fullStr An awkward relationship: the case of feminism and anthropology
title_full_unstemmed An awkward relationship: the case of feminism and anthropology
title_sort awkward relationship: the case of feminism and anthropology
publisher Universidade Estadual de Londrina
series Mediações: Revista de Ciências Sociais
issn 2176-6665
publishDate 2009-12-01
description This article explores some of the problems - and reactions - that arise in the dialogue between disciplinary practices and feminist theory. Certainly anthropology has interests parallel to those of feminist scholarship, but the proximity makes anthropologists’ resistance more poignant. That dissonance is actually a product of feminists’ and anthropologists’ intellectual proximity – as neighbors in tension. Practitioners of both imagine they might be overthrowing existing paradigms, and one might, in turn, expect “radical” anthropology to draw on its feminist counterpart, what does not seem to have happened. Their resistance to one another will throw light on the difference between “feminism” and “anthropology” as such.
topic Feminismo
Antropologia
Paradigmas.
url http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/mediacoes/article/view/4508
work_keys_str_mv AT marilynstrathern anawkwardrelationshipthecaseoffeminismandanthropology
AT marilynstrathern awkwardrelationshipthecaseoffeminismandanthropology
_version_ 1721565824373751808