An awkward relationship: the case of feminism and anthropology
This article explores some of the problems - and reactions - that arise in the dialogue between disciplinary practices and feminist theory. Certainly anthropology has interests parallel to those of feminist scholarship, but the proximity makes anthropologists’ resistance more poignant. That dissonan...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina
2009-12-01
|
Series: | Mediações: Revista de Ciências Sociais |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/mediacoes/article/view/4508 |
id |
doaj-8d221b10390244c992d7484ab8e64b3f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8d221b10390244c992d7484ab8e64b3f2021-04-02T13:14:12ZengUniversidade Estadual de LondrinaMediações: Revista de Ciências Sociais2176-66652009-12-011428310410.5433/2176-6665.2009v14n2p833333An awkward relationship: the case of feminism and anthropologyMarilyn Strathern0Universidade de CambridgeThis article explores some of the problems - and reactions - that arise in the dialogue between disciplinary practices and feminist theory. Certainly anthropology has interests parallel to those of feminist scholarship, but the proximity makes anthropologists’ resistance more poignant. That dissonance is actually a product of feminists’ and anthropologists’ intellectual proximity – as neighbors in tension. Practitioners of both imagine they might be overthrowing existing paradigms, and one might, in turn, expect “radical” anthropology to draw on its feminist counterpart, what does not seem to have happened. Their resistance to one another will throw light on the difference between “feminism” and “anthropology” as such.http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/mediacoes/article/view/4508FeminismoAntropologiaParadigmas. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Marilyn Strathern |
spellingShingle |
Marilyn Strathern An awkward relationship: the case of feminism and anthropology Mediações: Revista de Ciências Sociais Feminismo Antropologia Paradigmas. |
author_facet |
Marilyn Strathern |
author_sort |
Marilyn Strathern |
title |
An awkward relationship: the case of feminism and anthropology |
title_short |
An awkward relationship: the case of feminism and anthropology |
title_full |
An awkward relationship: the case of feminism and anthropology |
title_fullStr |
An awkward relationship: the case of feminism and anthropology |
title_full_unstemmed |
An awkward relationship: the case of feminism and anthropology |
title_sort |
awkward relationship: the case of feminism and anthropology |
publisher |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
series |
Mediações: Revista de Ciências Sociais |
issn |
2176-6665 |
publishDate |
2009-12-01 |
description |
This article explores some of the problems - and reactions - that arise in the dialogue between disciplinary practices and feminist theory. Certainly anthropology has interests parallel to those of feminist scholarship, but the proximity makes anthropologists’ resistance more poignant. That dissonance is actually a product of feminists’ and anthropologists’ intellectual proximity – as neighbors in tension. Practitioners of both imagine they might be overthrowing existing paradigms, and one might, in turn, expect “radical” anthropology to draw on its feminist counterpart, what does not seem to have happened. Their resistance to one another will throw light on the difference between “feminism” and “anthropology” as such. |
topic |
Feminismo Antropologia Paradigmas. |
url |
http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/mediacoes/article/view/4508 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marilynstrathern anawkwardrelationshipthecaseoffeminismandanthropology AT marilynstrathern awkwardrelationshipthecaseoffeminismandanthropology |
_version_ |
1721565824373751808 |