What can institutional analysis say about capitalism in Central and Eastern Europe? Results and limitations

A growing literature examines institutional arrangements in Central and Eastern European (CEE) market economies. Some sources claim that there is a distinct model of capitalism in this region. This paper overviews and analyzes the results of these studies in connection with crucial methodological is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Farkas Beáta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2018-12-01
Series:International Journal of Management and Economics
Subjects:
p16
p51
b41
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2018-0027
id doaj-8d2fd855023649f094eca0424a97f196
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8d2fd855023649f094eca0424a97f1962021-09-05T21:02:05ZengSciendoInternational Journal of Management and Economics2299-97012018-12-0154428329010.2478/ijme-2018-0027ijme-2018-0027What can institutional analysis say about capitalism in Central and Eastern Europe? Results and limitationsFarkas Beáta0University of Szeged, SzegedHungaryA growing literature examines institutional arrangements in Central and Eastern European (CEE) market economies. Some sources claim that there is a distinct model of capitalism in this region. This paper overviews and analyzes the results of these studies in connection with crucial methodological issues showing the limitations of institutional analysis. Despite all methodological difficulties, with a combination of different methods, institutional comparison is able to provide essential insights into the position and future prospects of CEE member states. One of the most important insights is that the maintenance of economic convergence to Western European countries requires substantial institutional changes. This paper also suggests that a broader historical context can help to evaluate opportunities and the risk of path dependency. It seems fruitful if the current development is fit into the conceptual framework which conceives of CEE as the region of “in-betweenness,” where the legacy of incomplete modernization attempts hinders the optimal institutional arrangement.https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2018-0027institutional comparisoncentral and eastern europevarieties of capitalismp16p51b41
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Farkas Beáta
spellingShingle Farkas Beáta
What can institutional analysis say about capitalism in Central and Eastern Europe? Results and limitations
International Journal of Management and Economics
institutional comparison
central and eastern europe
varieties of capitalism
p16
p51
b41
author_facet Farkas Beáta
author_sort Farkas Beáta
title What can institutional analysis say about capitalism in Central and Eastern Europe? Results and limitations
title_short What can institutional analysis say about capitalism in Central and Eastern Europe? Results and limitations
title_full What can institutional analysis say about capitalism in Central and Eastern Europe? Results and limitations
title_fullStr What can institutional analysis say about capitalism in Central and Eastern Europe? Results and limitations
title_full_unstemmed What can institutional analysis say about capitalism in Central and Eastern Europe? Results and limitations
title_sort what can institutional analysis say about capitalism in central and eastern europe? results and limitations
publisher Sciendo
series International Journal of Management and Economics
issn 2299-9701
publishDate 2018-12-01
description A growing literature examines institutional arrangements in Central and Eastern European (CEE) market economies. Some sources claim that there is a distinct model of capitalism in this region. This paper overviews and analyzes the results of these studies in connection with crucial methodological issues showing the limitations of institutional analysis. Despite all methodological difficulties, with a combination of different methods, institutional comparison is able to provide essential insights into the position and future prospects of CEE member states. One of the most important insights is that the maintenance of economic convergence to Western European countries requires substantial institutional changes. This paper also suggests that a broader historical context can help to evaluate opportunities and the risk of path dependency. It seems fruitful if the current development is fit into the conceptual framework which conceives of CEE as the region of “in-betweenness,” where the legacy of incomplete modernization attempts hinders the optimal institutional arrangement.
topic institutional comparison
central and eastern europe
varieties of capitalism
p16
p51
b41
url https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2018-0027
work_keys_str_mv AT farkasbeata whatcaninstitutionalanalysissayaboutcapitalismincentralandeasterneuroperesultsandlimitations
_version_ 1717781394363514880