The Integrated Dyspnea Clinic: An Evaluation of Efficiency

Introduction: Dyspnea is a common complaint and in 70 to 90% the origin is pulmonary or cardiovascular. However, referral to the “wrong” specialism could result in diagnostic- and treatment delay. Integrated care by a cardiologist and a pulmonologist could improve this. The aim of the present study...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mark V. Rietbroek, Annelies M. Slats, Philippine Kiès, Greetje J. de Grooth, Niels H. Chavannes, Christian Taube, Tobias N. Bonten
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2018-12-01
Series:International Journal of Integrated Care
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ijic.org/articles/3983
id doaj-8d42620633cc40de844322facc17ee6c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8d42620633cc40de844322facc17ee6c2020-11-24T22:03:56ZengUbiquity PressInternational Journal of Integrated Care1568-41562018-12-0118410.5334/ijic.39834077The Integrated Dyspnea Clinic: An Evaluation of EfficiencyMark V. Rietbroek0Annelies M. Slats1Philippine Kiès2Greetje J. de Grooth3Niels H. Chavannes4Christian Taube5Tobias N. Bonten6Department of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, LeidenDepartment of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center, LeidenDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, LeidenDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, LeidenDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, LeidenDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Ruhrlandklinik, West German Lung Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, EssenDepartment of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, LeidenIntroduction: Dyspnea is a common complaint and in 70 to 90% the origin is pulmonary or cardiovascular. However, referral to the “wrong” specialism could result in diagnostic- and treatment delay. Integrated care by a cardiologist and a pulmonologist could improve this. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether integrated care for patients with dyspnea is more efficient and effective than regular care. Methods: Consecutive patients (n = 235) seen at our dyspnea clinic after June 2014 were included. Two patient groups were compared: 1) patients with an integrated consultation and 2) patients with a non-integrated consultation, who were seen by the cardiologist and the pulmonologist on separate occasions. Results: The median time until first diagnosis, final diagnosis and time needed for diagnostic workup was shorter for patients evaluated by a integrated consultation compared with patients with a non-integrated consultation for dyspnea (16 days vs. 37 days, p < 0.001; 51 days vs. 78 days, p < 0.001; 35 days vs. 67 days, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the majority of diagnostic tests used and final medical conclusions. Conclusions: Patients with dyspnea evaluated using integrated care were diagnosed almost one month faster than patients in regular care without affecting the type of medical conclusions made. This study supports the start of a dyspnea clinic as an efficient way to provide integrated care to patients with dyspnea.   Take home message: Patients with dyspnea evaluated using integrated care where diagnosed one month faster than patients in regular care.https://www.ijic.org/articles/3983dyspneacardiorespiratoryhealth services researchintegrated careoutcome evaluationquality of care
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mark V. Rietbroek
Annelies M. Slats
Philippine Kiès
Greetje J. de Grooth
Niels H. Chavannes
Christian Taube
Tobias N. Bonten
spellingShingle Mark V. Rietbroek
Annelies M. Slats
Philippine Kiès
Greetje J. de Grooth
Niels H. Chavannes
Christian Taube
Tobias N. Bonten
The Integrated Dyspnea Clinic: An Evaluation of Efficiency
International Journal of Integrated Care
dyspnea
cardiorespiratory
health services research
integrated care
outcome evaluation
quality of care
author_facet Mark V. Rietbroek
Annelies M. Slats
Philippine Kiès
Greetje J. de Grooth
Niels H. Chavannes
Christian Taube
Tobias N. Bonten
author_sort Mark V. Rietbroek
title The Integrated Dyspnea Clinic: An Evaluation of Efficiency
title_short The Integrated Dyspnea Clinic: An Evaluation of Efficiency
title_full The Integrated Dyspnea Clinic: An Evaluation of Efficiency
title_fullStr The Integrated Dyspnea Clinic: An Evaluation of Efficiency
title_full_unstemmed The Integrated Dyspnea Clinic: An Evaluation of Efficiency
title_sort integrated dyspnea clinic: an evaluation of efficiency
publisher Ubiquity Press
series International Journal of Integrated Care
issn 1568-4156
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Introduction: Dyspnea is a common complaint and in 70 to 90% the origin is pulmonary or cardiovascular. However, referral to the “wrong” specialism could result in diagnostic- and treatment delay. Integrated care by a cardiologist and a pulmonologist could improve this. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether integrated care for patients with dyspnea is more efficient and effective than regular care. Methods: Consecutive patients (n = 235) seen at our dyspnea clinic after June 2014 were included. Two patient groups were compared: 1) patients with an integrated consultation and 2) patients with a non-integrated consultation, who were seen by the cardiologist and the pulmonologist on separate occasions. Results: The median time until first diagnosis, final diagnosis and time needed for diagnostic workup was shorter for patients evaluated by a integrated consultation compared with patients with a non-integrated consultation for dyspnea (16 days vs. 37 days, p < 0.001; 51 days vs. 78 days, p < 0.001; 35 days vs. 67 days, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the majority of diagnostic tests used and final medical conclusions. Conclusions: Patients with dyspnea evaluated using integrated care were diagnosed almost one month faster than patients in regular care without affecting the type of medical conclusions made. This study supports the start of a dyspnea clinic as an efficient way to provide integrated care to patients with dyspnea.   Take home message: Patients with dyspnea evaluated using integrated care where diagnosed one month faster than patients in regular care.
topic dyspnea
cardiorespiratory
health services research
integrated care
outcome evaluation
quality of care
url https://www.ijic.org/articles/3983
work_keys_str_mv AT markvrietbroek theintegrateddyspneaclinicanevaluationofefficiency
AT anneliesmslats theintegrateddyspneaclinicanevaluationofefficiency
AT philippinekies theintegrateddyspneaclinicanevaluationofefficiency
AT greetjejdegrooth theintegrateddyspneaclinicanevaluationofefficiency
AT nielshchavannes theintegrateddyspneaclinicanevaluationofefficiency
AT christiantaube theintegrateddyspneaclinicanevaluationofefficiency
AT tobiasnbonten theintegrateddyspneaclinicanevaluationofefficiency
AT markvrietbroek integrateddyspneaclinicanevaluationofefficiency
AT anneliesmslats integrateddyspneaclinicanevaluationofefficiency
AT philippinekies integrateddyspneaclinicanevaluationofefficiency
AT greetjejdegrooth integrateddyspneaclinicanevaluationofefficiency
AT nielshchavannes integrateddyspneaclinicanevaluationofefficiency
AT christiantaube integrateddyspneaclinicanevaluationofefficiency
AT tobiasnbonten integrateddyspneaclinicanevaluationofefficiency
_version_ 1725831481768542208