The relationship between acceptable noise level and electrophysiologic auditory brainstem and cortical signal to noise ratios

The following objectives of the study were formulated: i) to investigate differences in measured signal to noise ratios while recording speech-evoked auditory brainstem response (cABR) and cortical late latency response (LLR) in low and high acceptable noise level (ANL) groups; and ii) to compare pe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hemanth N. Shetty, Sankalapa Mahadev, Devamma Veeresh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2014-05-01
Series:Audiology Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://audiologyresearch.org/index.php/audio/article/view/93
id doaj-8d4d81e182de49bf8cb3b8e2156b5704
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8d4d81e182de49bf8cb3b8e2156b57042021-01-02T04:16:14ZengMDPI AGAudiology Research2039-43302039-43492014-05-014110.4081/audiores.2014.9363The relationship between acceptable noise level and electrophysiologic auditory brainstem and cortical signal to noise ratiosHemanth N. Shetty0Sankalapa Mahadev1Devamma Veeresh2Department of Audiology, All India Institute of Speech and HearingAudiology & Speech Language Pathology, All India Institute of Speech and HearingAudiology & Speech Language Pathology, All India Institute of Speech and HearingThe following objectives of the study were formulated: i) to investigate differences in measured signal to noise ratios while recording speech-evoked auditory brainstem response (cABR) and cortical late latency response (LLR) in low and high acceptable noise level (ANL) groups; and ii) to compare peak to peak amplitude of cABR (V-A) and LLR (N1-P2) in low and high ANL groups. A total of 23 normal hearing participants was included in the study. One shot replicative and partly exploratory research design was utilized to study the effect of signal to noise ratio in a recorded waveform on afferent mechanism, assessed by cABR and LLR on participants having values of ANL of ≤7 (low ANL group) and ≥13 (high ANL group). There were no differences in signal to noise ratio in the recorded waveforms of cABR and LLR between low and high ANL groups at both brainstem and cortical levels. However, the peak to peak amplitude of V-A of cABR and N1-P2 of LLR were both statistically larger in the high ANL group compared to their counterpart. The signal to noise ratio in recorded waveforms did not differentiated cABR (V-A) or LLR (N1-P2) in low and high ANL groups. However, Larger peak to peak amplitudes in the high ANL group suggests differences higher processing centers in the upper brainstem to the auditory cortex. The findings of the study may be useful in determining the patient acceptability of noise.https://audiologyresearch.org/index.php/audio/article/view/93signal to noise ratioauditory brainstem responselate latency response
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hemanth N. Shetty
Sankalapa Mahadev
Devamma Veeresh
spellingShingle Hemanth N. Shetty
Sankalapa Mahadev
Devamma Veeresh
The relationship between acceptable noise level and electrophysiologic auditory brainstem and cortical signal to noise ratios
Audiology Research
signal to noise ratio
auditory brainstem response
late latency response
author_facet Hemanth N. Shetty
Sankalapa Mahadev
Devamma Veeresh
author_sort Hemanth N. Shetty
title The relationship between acceptable noise level and electrophysiologic auditory brainstem and cortical signal to noise ratios
title_short The relationship between acceptable noise level and electrophysiologic auditory brainstem and cortical signal to noise ratios
title_full The relationship between acceptable noise level and electrophysiologic auditory brainstem and cortical signal to noise ratios
title_fullStr The relationship between acceptable noise level and electrophysiologic auditory brainstem and cortical signal to noise ratios
title_full_unstemmed The relationship between acceptable noise level and electrophysiologic auditory brainstem and cortical signal to noise ratios
title_sort relationship between acceptable noise level and electrophysiologic auditory brainstem and cortical signal to noise ratios
publisher MDPI AG
series Audiology Research
issn 2039-4330
2039-4349
publishDate 2014-05-01
description The following objectives of the study were formulated: i) to investigate differences in measured signal to noise ratios while recording speech-evoked auditory brainstem response (cABR) and cortical late latency response (LLR) in low and high acceptable noise level (ANL) groups; and ii) to compare peak to peak amplitude of cABR (V-A) and LLR (N1-P2) in low and high ANL groups. A total of 23 normal hearing participants was included in the study. One shot replicative and partly exploratory research design was utilized to study the effect of signal to noise ratio in a recorded waveform on afferent mechanism, assessed by cABR and LLR on participants having values of ANL of ≤7 (low ANL group) and ≥13 (high ANL group). There were no differences in signal to noise ratio in the recorded waveforms of cABR and LLR between low and high ANL groups at both brainstem and cortical levels. However, the peak to peak amplitude of V-A of cABR and N1-P2 of LLR were both statistically larger in the high ANL group compared to their counterpart. The signal to noise ratio in recorded waveforms did not differentiated cABR (V-A) or LLR (N1-P2) in low and high ANL groups. However, Larger peak to peak amplitudes in the high ANL group suggests differences higher processing centers in the upper brainstem to the auditory cortex. The findings of the study may be useful in determining the patient acceptability of noise.
topic signal to noise ratio
auditory brainstem response
late latency response
url https://audiologyresearch.org/index.php/audio/article/view/93
work_keys_str_mv AT hemanthnshetty therelationshipbetweenacceptablenoiselevelandelectrophysiologicauditorybrainstemandcorticalsignaltonoiseratios
AT sankalapamahadev therelationshipbetweenacceptablenoiselevelandelectrophysiologicauditorybrainstemandcorticalsignaltonoiseratios
AT devammaveeresh therelationshipbetweenacceptablenoiselevelandelectrophysiologicauditorybrainstemandcorticalsignaltonoiseratios
AT hemanthnshetty relationshipbetweenacceptablenoiselevelandelectrophysiologicauditorybrainstemandcorticalsignaltonoiseratios
AT sankalapamahadev relationshipbetweenacceptablenoiselevelandelectrophysiologicauditorybrainstemandcorticalsignaltonoiseratios
AT devammaveeresh relationshipbetweenacceptablenoiselevelandelectrophysiologicauditorybrainstemandcorticalsignaltonoiseratios
_version_ 1724360578663710720