A Comparative Study between Modified Bassini’s Repair and Lichtenstein Mesh Repair (LMR) of Inguinal Hernias in Rural Population

Background: Bassini’s repair and the Lichtenstein’s tension free mesh hernioplasty are commonly used hernia repair techniques and yet there is no unison as to which is the best technique. Our hospital being in a rural setup and catering to majority of poor patients who are daily wagers, open her...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Naveen N., Srinath R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2014-02-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/4016/27-%207431_E(%20_%20)_F(H)_PF1(VH)_PFA(AK)_PF2(NJH)_PFA(H)_BO(NJPUH).pdf
id doaj-8d6b608202f641a192853850ff1b93bf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8d6b608202f641a192853850ff1b93bf2020-11-25T02:38:08ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2014-02-0182889110.7860/JCDR/2014/7431.4016A Comparative Study between Modified Bassini’s Repair and Lichtenstein Mesh Repair (LMR) of Inguinal Hernias in Rural PopulationNaveen N.0Srinath R.1Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, India.Professor and HOD, Department of General Surgery, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, India.Background: Bassini’s repair and the Lichtenstein’s tension free mesh hernioplasty are commonly used hernia repair techniques and yet there is no unison as to which is the best technique. Our hospital being in a rural setup and catering to majority of poor patients who are daily wagers, open hernia repairs are commonly done. This study was undertaken to compare the technique and post-operative course so as to determine the best suitable of the two procedures for them. Materials and Methods: A comparative randomized study was conducted on a total of 70 patients with inguinal hernia and were operated upon by either of technique and followed up. Outcome of both the techniques were analyzed and compared with other similar studies. Results: Study involved 35 each of Modified Bassini’s Repair (MBR) and Lichtenstein’s Mesh Repair (LMR), over a period of 18 months. MBR took more operating time than LMR. Commonest complication in both the groups was seroma formation. There were two recurrences in the MBR group and none in LMR group. Conclusion: LMR was comparatively better than MBR due to its simplicity, less dissection and early ambulation in the postoperative period and with no recurrence, in our study.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/4016/27-%207431_E(%20_%20)_F(H)_PF1(VH)_PFA(AK)_PF2(NJH)_PFA(H)_BO(NJPUH).pdfinguinal herniamodified bassini’s repairlichtenstein mesh repair
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Naveen N.
Srinath R.
spellingShingle Naveen N.
Srinath R.
A Comparative Study between Modified Bassini’s Repair and Lichtenstein Mesh Repair (LMR) of Inguinal Hernias in Rural Population
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
inguinal hernia
modified bassini’s repair
lichtenstein mesh repair
author_facet Naveen N.
Srinath R.
author_sort Naveen N.
title A Comparative Study between Modified Bassini’s Repair and Lichtenstein Mesh Repair (LMR) of Inguinal Hernias in Rural Population
title_short A Comparative Study between Modified Bassini’s Repair and Lichtenstein Mesh Repair (LMR) of Inguinal Hernias in Rural Population
title_full A Comparative Study between Modified Bassini’s Repair and Lichtenstein Mesh Repair (LMR) of Inguinal Hernias in Rural Population
title_fullStr A Comparative Study between Modified Bassini’s Repair and Lichtenstein Mesh Repair (LMR) of Inguinal Hernias in Rural Population
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study between Modified Bassini’s Repair and Lichtenstein Mesh Repair (LMR) of Inguinal Hernias in Rural Population
title_sort comparative study between modified bassini’s repair and lichtenstein mesh repair (lmr) of inguinal hernias in rural population
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
issn 2249-782X
0973-709X
publishDate 2014-02-01
description Background: Bassini’s repair and the Lichtenstein’s tension free mesh hernioplasty are commonly used hernia repair techniques and yet there is no unison as to which is the best technique. Our hospital being in a rural setup and catering to majority of poor patients who are daily wagers, open hernia repairs are commonly done. This study was undertaken to compare the technique and post-operative course so as to determine the best suitable of the two procedures for them. Materials and Methods: A comparative randomized study was conducted on a total of 70 patients with inguinal hernia and were operated upon by either of technique and followed up. Outcome of both the techniques were analyzed and compared with other similar studies. Results: Study involved 35 each of Modified Bassini’s Repair (MBR) and Lichtenstein’s Mesh Repair (LMR), over a period of 18 months. MBR took more operating time than LMR. Commonest complication in both the groups was seroma formation. There were two recurrences in the MBR group and none in LMR group. Conclusion: LMR was comparatively better than MBR due to its simplicity, less dissection and early ambulation in the postoperative period and with no recurrence, in our study.
topic inguinal hernia
modified bassini’s repair
lichtenstein mesh repair
url https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/4016/27-%207431_E(%20_%20)_F(H)_PF1(VH)_PFA(AK)_PF2(NJH)_PFA(H)_BO(NJPUH).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT naveenn acomparativestudybetweenmodifiedbassinisrepairandlichtensteinmeshrepairlmrofinguinalherniasinruralpopulation
AT srinathr acomparativestudybetweenmodifiedbassinisrepairandlichtensteinmeshrepairlmrofinguinalherniasinruralpopulation
AT naveenn comparativestudybetweenmodifiedbassinisrepairandlichtensteinmeshrepairlmrofinguinalherniasinruralpopulation
AT srinathr comparativestudybetweenmodifiedbassinisrepairandlichtensteinmeshrepairlmrofinguinalherniasinruralpopulation
_version_ 1724792505896009728