From Basel I to Basel II

This paper examines the journey from Basel I to Basel II. It examines the historical developments and the circumstances that led to the formulation of the famous Basel-I Accord in 1988, and its further refinement over the next two decades culminating in the finalization of a comprehensive document v...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Riaz Ahmed, Manzoor A. Khalidi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Karachi Institute of Economics and Technology 2007-10-01
Series:Market Forces
Online Access:http://www.pafkiet.edu.pk/dnnbeta/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=d3nSQhUzwSE%3d&tabid=160&mid=724
id doaj-8d7fb513014549fba433ef55cfbe49cd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8d7fb513014549fba433ef55cfbe49cd2020-11-25T01:36:43ZengKarachi Institute of Economics and TechnologyMarket Forces1816-84342007-10-0133199214From Basel I to Basel IIRiaz AhmedManzoor A. KhalidiThis paper examines the journey from Basel I to Basel II. It examines the historical developments and the circumstances that led to the formulation of the famous Basel-I Accord in 1988, and its further refinement over the next two decades culminating in the finalization of a comprehensive document viz., the Basel-II Accord. The objective of the paper is to provide an insight into the long drawn and painstaking consultative process conducted under the aegis of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision to address some of the long-standing weaknesses inherent in the original Basel Capital Adequacy Accord. The paper examines the process of development of the Basel Accord from a simple and crude credit risk measurement based capital adequacy accord into a comprehensive risk control framework grounded on three pillars: one, the Capital Adequacy Pillar which aims to improve the link between Bank Capital and the risks that could lead to Bank Insolvency; two, the Supervisory Pillar which aims to improve the Supervision Capacity of the regulators / supervisors to control the risk of bank failure; and three, the Transparency Pillar which is aimed at enhancing the capacity of the market’s Self Regulatory Mechanism. The paper acknowledges that by responding positively to some of the criticisms leveled at it during the various rounds of consultations the Committee has accommodated different points of views in the revised framework which has made it a more comprehensive and a more widely acceptable document for the bank supervisors around the world. The paper is expected to help facilitate a better understanding of the process of regulatory development.http://www.pafkiet.edu.pk/dnnbeta/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=d3nSQhUzwSE%3d&tabid=160&mid=724
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Riaz Ahmed
Manzoor A. Khalidi
spellingShingle Riaz Ahmed
Manzoor A. Khalidi
From Basel I to Basel II
Market Forces
author_facet Riaz Ahmed
Manzoor A. Khalidi
author_sort Riaz Ahmed
title From Basel I to Basel II
title_short From Basel I to Basel II
title_full From Basel I to Basel II
title_fullStr From Basel I to Basel II
title_full_unstemmed From Basel I to Basel II
title_sort from basel i to basel ii
publisher Karachi Institute of Economics and Technology
series Market Forces
issn 1816-8434
publishDate 2007-10-01
description This paper examines the journey from Basel I to Basel II. It examines the historical developments and the circumstances that led to the formulation of the famous Basel-I Accord in 1988, and its further refinement over the next two decades culminating in the finalization of a comprehensive document viz., the Basel-II Accord. The objective of the paper is to provide an insight into the long drawn and painstaking consultative process conducted under the aegis of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision to address some of the long-standing weaknesses inherent in the original Basel Capital Adequacy Accord. The paper examines the process of development of the Basel Accord from a simple and crude credit risk measurement based capital adequacy accord into a comprehensive risk control framework grounded on three pillars: one, the Capital Adequacy Pillar which aims to improve the link between Bank Capital and the risks that could lead to Bank Insolvency; two, the Supervisory Pillar which aims to improve the Supervision Capacity of the regulators / supervisors to control the risk of bank failure; and three, the Transparency Pillar which is aimed at enhancing the capacity of the market’s Self Regulatory Mechanism. The paper acknowledges that by responding positively to some of the criticisms leveled at it during the various rounds of consultations the Committee has accommodated different points of views in the revised framework which has made it a more comprehensive and a more widely acceptable document for the bank supervisors around the world. The paper is expected to help facilitate a better understanding of the process of regulatory development.
url http://www.pafkiet.edu.pk/dnnbeta/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=d3nSQhUzwSE%3d&tabid=160&mid=724
work_keys_str_mv AT riazahmed frombaselitobaselii
AT manzoorakhalidi frombaselitobaselii
_version_ 1725061387066015744