Biosafety Regulatory Reviews and Leeway to Operate: Case Studies From Sub-Sahara Africa

While modern biotechnology and, specifically, genetic modification are subject of debate in many parts of the world, an increasing number of countries in Sub-Sahara Africa are making important strides towards authorizing general releases of genetically modified (GM) crop varieties for use by farmers...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John Komen, Leena Tripathi, Boniface Mkoko, Daniel Osei Ofosu, Herbert Oloka, Doris Wangari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Plant Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2020.00130/full
id doaj-8ddbae91066249fc8a0fd137b791b896
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8ddbae91066249fc8a0fd137b791b8962020-11-25T03:07:38ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Plant Science1664-462X2020-03-011110.3389/fpls.2020.00130497930Biosafety Regulatory Reviews and Leeway to Operate: Case Studies From Sub-Sahara AfricaJohn Komen0Leena Tripathi1Boniface Mkoko2Daniel Osei Ofosu3Herbert Oloka4Doris Wangari5Komen Bioscience Consultancy, Haarlem, NetherlandsInternational Institute for Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Plant Biotechnology, Nairobi, KenyaProgram for Biosafety Systems, Lilongwe, MalawiBiotechnology and Nuclear Agriculture Research Institute, Ghana Atomic Energy Commission, Accra, GhanaProgram for Biosafety Systems, Kampala, UgandaProgram for Biosafety Systems, Nairobi, KenyaWhile modern biotechnology and, specifically, genetic modification are subject of debate in many parts of the world, an increasing number of countries in Sub-Sahara Africa are making important strides towards authorizing general releases of genetically modified (GM) crop varieties for use by farmers and agribusinesses. Obviously, the documented economic and environmental benefits from planting GM crops—based on a track record of over two decades—are a major driver in the decision-making process. Another key factor is the increasing alignment of biosafety regulatory policies with progressive agricultural and rural development policies in Africa, resulting in—compared to past experiences—greater emphasis on anticipated benefits rather than risks in biosafety regulatory reviews. In several cases, this has led to expedited reviews of GM crop release applications, either for confined field trials or general environmental release, taking experiences and data from other countries into account. Such regulatory approaches hold promise as the pipeline of relevant, pro-poor GM crop applications is expanding as are the opportunities provided by novel plant breeding techniques. This review article analyses the shifting policy context in select African economies, resulting in adoption of new agricultural technology, and novel regulatory approaches used in biosafety decision-making. Case studies will be presented for Ghana, Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria and Uganda to analyze challenges, distill lessons learned and to present general policy recommendations for emerging economies.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2020.00130/fullpolicy & institutional actionsbiotechnologybiosafety analysisregulationgenome editing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John Komen
Leena Tripathi
Boniface Mkoko
Daniel Osei Ofosu
Herbert Oloka
Doris Wangari
spellingShingle John Komen
Leena Tripathi
Boniface Mkoko
Daniel Osei Ofosu
Herbert Oloka
Doris Wangari
Biosafety Regulatory Reviews and Leeway to Operate: Case Studies From Sub-Sahara Africa
Frontiers in Plant Science
policy & institutional actions
biotechnology
biosafety analysis
regulation
genome editing
author_facet John Komen
Leena Tripathi
Boniface Mkoko
Daniel Osei Ofosu
Herbert Oloka
Doris Wangari
author_sort John Komen
title Biosafety Regulatory Reviews and Leeway to Operate: Case Studies From Sub-Sahara Africa
title_short Biosafety Regulatory Reviews and Leeway to Operate: Case Studies From Sub-Sahara Africa
title_full Biosafety Regulatory Reviews and Leeway to Operate: Case Studies From Sub-Sahara Africa
title_fullStr Biosafety Regulatory Reviews and Leeway to Operate: Case Studies From Sub-Sahara Africa
title_full_unstemmed Biosafety Regulatory Reviews and Leeway to Operate: Case Studies From Sub-Sahara Africa
title_sort biosafety regulatory reviews and leeway to operate: case studies from sub-sahara africa
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Plant Science
issn 1664-462X
publishDate 2020-03-01
description While modern biotechnology and, specifically, genetic modification are subject of debate in many parts of the world, an increasing number of countries in Sub-Sahara Africa are making important strides towards authorizing general releases of genetically modified (GM) crop varieties for use by farmers and agribusinesses. Obviously, the documented economic and environmental benefits from planting GM crops—based on a track record of over two decades—are a major driver in the decision-making process. Another key factor is the increasing alignment of biosafety regulatory policies with progressive agricultural and rural development policies in Africa, resulting in—compared to past experiences—greater emphasis on anticipated benefits rather than risks in biosafety regulatory reviews. In several cases, this has led to expedited reviews of GM crop release applications, either for confined field trials or general environmental release, taking experiences and data from other countries into account. Such regulatory approaches hold promise as the pipeline of relevant, pro-poor GM crop applications is expanding as are the opportunities provided by novel plant breeding techniques. This review article analyses the shifting policy context in select African economies, resulting in adoption of new agricultural technology, and novel regulatory approaches used in biosafety decision-making. Case studies will be presented for Ghana, Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria and Uganda to analyze challenges, distill lessons learned and to present general policy recommendations for emerging economies.
topic policy & institutional actions
biotechnology
biosafety analysis
regulation
genome editing
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2020.00130/full
work_keys_str_mv AT johnkomen biosafetyregulatoryreviewsandleewaytooperatecasestudiesfromsubsaharaafrica
AT leenatripathi biosafetyregulatoryreviewsandleewaytooperatecasestudiesfromsubsaharaafrica
AT bonifacemkoko biosafetyregulatoryreviewsandleewaytooperatecasestudiesfromsubsaharaafrica
AT danieloseiofosu biosafetyregulatoryreviewsandleewaytooperatecasestudiesfromsubsaharaafrica
AT herbertoloka biosafetyregulatoryreviewsandleewaytooperatecasestudiesfromsubsaharaafrica
AT doriswangari biosafetyregulatoryreviewsandleewaytooperatecasestudiesfromsubsaharaafrica
_version_ 1724669287590789120