CFD Simulation of Pollutant Emission in a Natural Draft Dry Cooling Tower with Flue Gas Injection: Comparison between LES and RANS

Accurate prediction of pollutant dispersion is vital to the energy industry. This study investigated the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation of pollutant emission in a natural draft dry cooling tower (NDDCT) with flue gas injection. In order to predict the diffusion and distribution charac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guangjun Yang, Xiaoxiao Li, Li Ding, Fahua Zhu, Zhigang Wang, Sheng Wang, Zhen Xu, Jingxin Xu, Pengxiang Qiu, Zhaobing Guo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-09-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
LES
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/19/3630
id doaj-8ddfc61404c949b0bb48eac97310cee8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8ddfc61404c949b0bb48eac97310cee82020-11-25T02:12:15ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732019-09-011219363010.3390/en12193630en12193630CFD Simulation of Pollutant Emission in a Natural Draft Dry Cooling Tower with Flue Gas Injection: Comparison between LES and RANSGuangjun Yang0Xiaoxiao Li1Li Ding2Fahua Zhu3Zhigang Wang4Sheng Wang5Zhen Xu6Jingxin Xu7Pengxiang Qiu8Zhaobing Guo9School of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, ChinaKey Laboratory of Low-grade Energy Utilization Technologies and Systems, Ministry of Education, College of Power Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, ChinaState Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Physical Modeling and Pollution Control, National Environmental Protection Research Institute for Electric Power, Nanjing 210031, ChinaState Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Physical Modeling and Pollution Control, National Environmental Protection Research Institute for Electric Power, Nanjing 210031, ChinaState Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Physical Modeling and Pollution Control, National Environmental Protection Research Institute for Electric Power, Nanjing 210031, ChinaState Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Physical Modeling and Pollution Control, National Environmental Protection Research Institute for Electric Power, Nanjing 210031, ChinaState Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Physical Modeling and Pollution Control, National Environmental Protection Research Institute for Electric Power, Nanjing 210031, ChinaState Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Physical Modeling and Pollution Control, National Environmental Protection Research Institute for Electric Power, Nanjing 210031, ChinaState Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Physical Modeling and Pollution Control, National Environmental Protection Research Institute for Electric Power, Nanjing 210031, ChinaSchool of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, ChinaAccurate prediction of pollutant dispersion is vital to the energy industry. This study investigated the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation of pollutant emission in a natural draft dry cooling tower (NDDCT) with flue gas injection. In order to predict the diffusion and distribution characteristics of the pollutant more accurately, Large Eddy Simulation (LES) was applied to predict the flow field and pollutant concentration field and compared with Reynolds Average Navier-Stokes (RANS) and Unsteady Reynolds Average Navier-Stokes (URANS). The relationship between pollutant concentration pulsation and velocity pulsation is emphatically analyzed. The results show that the flow field and concentration field simulated by RANS and URANS are very close, and the maximum value of LES is about 43 times that of RANS and URANS for the prediction of pollutant concentration in the inner shell of cooling tower. Pollutant concentration is closely related to local flow field velocity. RANS and URANS differ greatly from LES in flow field prediction, especially at the outlet and downwind of cooling tower. Compared with URANS, LES can simulate flow field pulsation with a smaller scale and higher frequency.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/19/3630NDDCTflue gaspollutant diffusionRANSLES
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Guangjun Yang
Xiaoxiao Li
Li Ding
Fahua Zhu
Zhigang Wang
Sheng Wang
Zhen Xu
Jingxin Xu
Pengxiang Qiu
Zhaobing Guo
spellingShingle Guangjun Yang
Xiaoxiao Li
Li Ding
Fahua Zhu
Zhigang Wang
Sheng Wang
Zhen Xu
Jingxin Xu
Pengxiang Qiu
Zhaobing Guo
CFD Simulation of Pollutant Emission in a Natural Draft Dry Cooling Tower with Flue Gas Injection: Comparison between LES and RANS
Energies
NDDCT
flue gas
pollutant diffusion
RANS
LES
author_facet Guangjun Yang
Xiaoxiao Li
Li Ding
Fahua Zhu
Zhigang Wang
Sheng Wang
Zhen Xu
Jingxin Xu
Pengxiang Qiu
Zhaobing Guo
author_sort Guangjun Yang
title CFD Simulation of Pollutant Emission in a Natural Draft Dry Cooling Tower with Flue Gas Injection: Comparison between LES and RANS
title_short CFD Simulation of Pollutant Emission in a Natural Draft Dry Cooling Tower with Flue Gas Injection: Comparison between LES and RANS
title_full CFD Simulation of Pollutant Emission in a Natural Draft Dry Cooling Tower with Flue Gas Injection: Comparison between LES and RANS
title_fullStr CFD Simulation of Pollutant Emission in a Natural Draft Dry Cooling Tower with Flue Gas Injection: Comparison between LES and RANS
title_full_unstemmed CFD Simulation of Pollutant Emission in a Natural Draft Dry Cooling Tower with Flue Gas Injection: Comparison between LES and RANS
title_sort cfd simulation of pollutant emission in a natural draft dry cooling tower with flue gas injection: comparison between les and rans
publisher MDPI AG
series Energies
issn 1996-1073
publishDate 2019-09-01
description Accurate prediction of pollutant dispersion is vital to the energy industry. This study investigated the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation of pollutant emission in a natural draft dry cooling tower (NDDCT) with flue gas injection. In order to predict the diffusion and distribution characteristics of the pollutant more accurately, Large Eddy Simulation (LES) was applied to predict the flow field and pollutant concentration field and compared with Reynolds Average Navier-Stokes (RANS) and Unsteady Reynolds Average Navier-Stokes (URANS). The relationship between pollutant concentration pulsation and velocity pulsation is emphatically analyzed. The results show that the flow field and concentration field simulated by RANS and URANS are very close, and the maximum value of LES is about 43 times that of RANS and URANS for the prediction of pollutant concentration in the inner shell of cooling tower. Pollutant concentration is closely related to local flow field velocity. RANS and URANS differ greatly from LES in flow field prediction, especially at the outlet and downwind of cooling tower. Compared with URANS, LES can simulate flow field pulsation with a smaller scale and higher frequency.
topic NDDCT
flue gas
pollutant diffusion
RANS
LES
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/19/3630
work_keys_str_mv AT guangjunyang cfdsimulationofpollutantemissioninanaturaldraftdrycoolingtowerwithfluegasinjectioncomparisonbetweenlesandrans
AT xiaoxiaoli cfdsimulationofpollutantemissioninanaturaldraftdrycoolingtowerwithfluegasinjectioncomparisonbetweenlesandrans
AT liding cfdsimulationofpollutantemissioninanaturaldraftdrycoolingtowerwithfluegasinjectioncomparisonbetweenlesandrans
AT fahuazhu cfdsimulationofpollutantemissioninanaturaldraftdrycoolingtowerwithfluegasinjectioncomparisonbetweenlesandrans
AT zhigangwang cfdsimulationofpollutantemissioninanaturaldraftdrycoolingtowerwithfluegasinjectioncomparisonbetweenlesandrans
AT shengwang cfdsimulationofpollutantemissioninanaturaldraftdrycoolingtowerwithfluegasinjectioncomparisonbetweenlesandrans
AT zhenxu cfdsimulationofpollutantemissioninanaturaldraftdrycoolingtowerwithfluegasinjectioncomparisonbetweenlesandrans
AT jingxinxu cfdsimulationofpollutantemissioninanaturaldraftdrycoolingtowerwithfluegasinjectioncomparisonbetweenlesandrans
AT pengxiangqiu cfdsimulationofpollutantemissioninanaturaldraftdrycoolingtowerwithfluegasinjectioncomparisonbetweenlesandrans
AT zhaobingguo cfdsimulationofpollutantemissioninanaturaldraftdrycoolingtowerwithfluegasinjectioncomparisonbetweenlesandrans
_version_ 1724910507738005504