Autonomies in Interaction: Dimensions of Patient Autonomy and Non-adherence to Treatment

In recent years, several studies have advocated the need to expand the concept of patient autonomy beyond the capacity to deliberate and make decisions regarding a specific medical intervention or treatment (decision-making or decisional autonomy). Arguing along the same lines, this paper proposes a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ion Arrieta Valero
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01857/full
id doaj-8e140db5c4b44987aeb575579f8a452a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8e140db5c4b44987aeb575579f8a452a2020-11-25T01:07:41ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782019-08-011010.3389/fpsyg.2019.01857471183Autonomies in Interaction: Dimensions of Patient Autonomy and Non-adherence to TreatmentIon Arrieta ValeroIn recent years, several studies have advocated the need to expand the concept of patient autonomy beyond the capacity to deliberate and make decisions regarding a specific medical intervention or treatment (decision-making or decisional autonomy). Arguing along the same lines, this paper proposes a multidimensional concept of patient autonomy (decisional, executive, functional, informative, and narrative) and argues that determining the specific aspect of autonomy affected is the first step toward protecting or promoting (and respecting) patient autonomy. These different manifestations of autonomy are not mutually dependent; there may be patients who have problems in one dimension, while at the same time being fully autonomous in others. Nevertheless, a close interaction has been observed between the various dimensions, and indeed, a phenomenological analysis shows that damage to or a reduction in one aspect of people’s capacity for self-government generally affects other aspects of their autonomy, which in turn disrupts their identity and the way in which they see themselves and are seen by others. In this paper, I shall examine some of these interactions and show how they may lie at the heart of the problem of poor treatment adherence in many patients with chronic ailments (where adherence is defined as being the extent to which a patient’s behavior over time coincides with the recommendations made by and agreed with their health professional). One example given is that of psoriasis, a chronic skin disease with a very poor adherence record. In Spain, it is calculated that 85% of patients diagnosed with mild to moderate psoriasis fail to comply properly with their treatment, and figures from other parts of the world are similar. Although there are many possible causes for non-adherence among psoriasis patients, assessing their decisional, executive, and narrative capacities and taking appropriate action based on the results may help increase adherence rates.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01857/fullpatient autonomydecisional autonomyexecutive autonomynarrative autonomycapacityidentity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ion Arrieta Valero
spellingShingle Ion Arrieta Valero
Autonomies in Interaction: Dimensions of Patient Autonomy and Non-adherence to Treatment
Frontiers in Psychology
patient autonomy
decisional autonomy
executive autonomy
narrative autonomy
capacity
identity
author_facet Ion Arrieta Valero
author_sort Ion Arrieta Valero
title Autonomies in Interaction: Dimensions of Patient Autonomy and Non-adherence to Treatment
title_short Autonomies in Interaction: Dimensions of Patient Autonomy and Non-adherence to Treatment
title_full Autonomies in Interaction: Dimensions of Patient Autonomy and Non-adherence to Treatment
title_fullStr Autonomies in Interaction: Dimensions of Patient Autonomy and Non-adherence to Treatment
title_full_unstemmed Autonomies in Interaction: Dimensions of Patient Autonomy and Non-adherence to Treatment
title_sort autonomies in interaction: dimensions of patient autonomy and non-adherence to treatment
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2019-08-01
description In recent years, several studies have advocated the need to expand the concept of patient autonomy beyond the capacity to deliberate and make decisions regarding a specific medical intervention or treatment (decision-making or decisional autonomy). Arguing along the same lines, this paper proposes a multidimensional concept of patient autonomy (decisional, executive, functional, informative, and narrative) and argues that determining the specific aspect of autonomy affected is the first step toward protecting or promoting (and respecting) patient autonomy. These different manifestations of autonomy are not mutually dependent; there may be patients who have problems in one dimension, while at the same time being fully autonomous in others. Nevertheless, a close interaction has been observed between the various dimensions, and indeed, a phenomenological analysis shows that damage to or a reduction in one aspect of people’s capacity for self-government generally affects other aspects of their autonomy, which in turn disrupts their identity and the way in which they see themselves and are seen by others. In this paper, I shall examine some of these interactions and show how they may lie at the heart of the problem of poor treatment adherence in many patients with chronic ailments (where adherence is defined as being the extent to which a patient’s behavior over time coincides with the recommendations made by and agreed with their health professional). One example given is that of psoriasis, a chronic skin disease with a very poor adherence record. In Spain, it is calculated that 85% of patients diagnosed with mild to moderate psoriasis fail to comply properly with their treatment, and figures from other parts of the world are similar. Although there are many possible causes for non-adherence among psoriasis patients, assessing their decisional, executive, and narrative capacities and taking appropriate action based on the results may help increase adherence rates.
topic patient autonomy
decisional autonomy
executive autonomy
narrative autonomy
capacity
identity
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01857/full
work_keys_str_mv AT ionarrietavalero autonomiesininteractiondimensionsofpatientautonomyandnonadherencetotreatment
_version_ 1725186011046084608