EEG-based functional brain networks: does the network size matter?

Functional connectivity in human brain can be represented as a network using electroencephalography (EEG) signals. These networks--whose nodes can vary from tens to hundreds--are characterized by neurobiologically meaningful graph theory metrics. This study investigates the degree to which various g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amir Joudaki, Niloufar Salehi, Mahdi Jalili, Maria G Knyazeva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22558196/?tool=EBI
id doaj-8e1739ad84ad43a1ac0aaa0020284b9e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8e1739ad84ad43a1ac0aaa0020284b9e2021-03-04T00:49:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0174e3567310.1371/journal.pone.0035673EEG-based functional brain networks: does the network size matter?Amir JoudakiNiloufar SalehiMahdi JaliliMaria G KnyazevaFunctional connectivity in human brain can be represented as a network using electroencephalography (EEG) signals. These networks--whose nodes can vary from tens to hundreds--are characterized by neurobiologically meaningful graph theory metrics. This study investigates the degree to which various graph metrics depend upon the network size. To this end, EEGs from 32 normal subjects were recorded and functional networks of three different sizes were extracted. A state-space based method was used to calculate cross-correlation matrices between different brain regions. These correlation matrices were used to construct binary adjacency connectomes, which were assessed with regards to a number of graph metrics such as clustering coefficient, modularity, efficiency, economic efficiency, and assortativity. We showed that the estimates of these metrics significantly differ depending on the network size. Larger networks had higher efficiency, higher assortativity and lower modularity compared to those with smaller size and the same density. These findings indicate that the network size should be considered in any comparison of networks across studies.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22558196/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Amir Joudaki
Niloufar Salehi
Mahdi Jalili
Maria G Knyazeva
spellingShingle Amir Joudaki
Niloufar Salehi
Mahdi Jalili
Maria G Knyazeva
EEG-based functional brain networks: does the network size matter?
PLoS ONE
author_facet Amir Joudaki
Niloufar Salehi
Mahdi Jalili
Maria G Knyazeva
author_sort Amir Joudaki
title EEG-based functional brain networks: does the network size matter?
title_short EEG-based functional brain networks: does the network size matter?
title_full EEG-based functional brain networks: does the network size matter?
title_fullStr EEG-based functional brain networks: does the network size matter?
title_full_unstemmed EEG-based functional brain networks: does the network size matter?
title_sort eeg-based functional brain networks: does the network size matter?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Functional connectivity in human brain can be represented as a network using electroencephalography (EEG) signals. These networks--whose nodes can vary from tens to hundreds--are characterized by neurobiologically meaningful graph theory metrics. This study investigates the degree to which various graph metrics depend upon the network size. To this end, EEGs from 32 normal subjects were recorded and functional networks of three different sizes were extracted. A state-space based method was used to calculate cross-correlation matrices between different brain regions. These correlation matrices were used to construct binary adjacency connectomes, which were assessed with regards to a number of graph metrics such as clustering coefficient, modularity, efficiency, economic efficiency, and assortativity. We showed that the estimates of these metrics significantly differ depending on the network size. Larger networks had higher efficiency, higher assortativity and lower modularity compared to those with smaller size and the same density. These findings indicate that the network size should be considered in any comparison of networks across studies.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22558196/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT amirjoudaki eegbasedfunctionalbrainnetworksdoesthenetworksizematter
AT niloufarsalehi eegbasedfunctionalbrainnetworksdoesthenetworksizematter
AT mahdijalili eegbasedfunctionalbrainnetworksdoesthenetworksizematter
AT mariagknyazeva eegbasedfunctionalbrainnetworksdoesthenetworksizematter
_version_ 1714810006572892160