Milk-Fat Intake and Differences in Abdominal Adiposity and BMI: Evidence Based on 13,544 Randomly-Selected Adults

The primary purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the relationship between milk-fat intake and obesity, particularly abdominal obesity, in 13,544 U.S. adults. A lesser objective was to measure the degree to which the association was influenced by multiple potential confounding variables. Thi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Klarissa R. Wilkinson, Larry A. Tucker, Lance E. Davidson, Bruce W. Bailey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-05-01
Series:Nutrients
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/6/1832
id doaj-8e29ae60073f40819e2cc1dd59f8db4e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8e29ae60073f40819e2cc1dd59f8db4e2021-06-01T01:21:08ZengMDPI AGNutrients2072-66432021-05-01131832183210.3390/nu13061832Milk-Fat Intake and Differences in Abdominal Adiposity and BMI: Evidence Based on 13,544 Randomly-Selected AdultsKlarissa R. Wilkinson0Larry A. Tucker1Lance E. Davidson2Bruce W. Bailey3College of Life Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USACollege of Life Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USACollege of Life Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USACollege of Life Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USAThe primary purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the relationship between milk-fat intake and obesity, particularly abdominal obesity, in 13,544 U.S. adults. A lesser objective was to measure the degree to which the association was influenced by multiple potential confounding variables. This cross-sectional study used data from the 2011–2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Quantity of milk-fat regularly consumed was the exposure variable. Sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD), a measure of abdominal obesity, and body mass index (BMI) were the outcome variables. Sagittal abdominal diameter is a strong predictor of visceral abdominal fat, when measured by computed tomography, and has been shown to predict cardiometabolic disorders better than BMI. After controlling for age, race, gender, physical activity, leisure computer use and gaming, alcohol habits, and cigarette use, significantly lower BMIs were associated with consistent non-fat and full-fat milk consumption (F = 4.1, <i>p</i> = 0.0063). A significantly lower SAD was associated only with regular consumption of non-fat milk (F = 5.0, <i>p</i> = 0.0019). No significant differences were detected between the other milk-fat groups or milk abstainers. In this nationally representative sample, only 19.6% of adults regularly consumed low-fat milk. In conclusion, consistent non-fat milk intake was predictive of lower levels of abdominal adiposity compared to consumption of higher levels of milk-fat.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/6/1832overweightobesitysagittal diameterwaist circumferencedairydiet
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Klarissa R. Wilkinson
Larry A. Tucker
Lance E. Davidson
Bruce W. Bailey
spellingShingle Klarissa R. Wilkinson
Larry A. Tucker
Lance E. Davidson
Bruce W. Bailey
Milk-Fat Intake and Differences in Abdominal Adiposity and BMI: Evidence Based on 13,544 Randomly-Selected Adults
Nutrients
overweight
obesity
sagittal diameter
waist circumference
dairy
diet
author_facet Klarissa R. Wilkinson
Larry A. Tucker
Lance E. Davidson
Bruce W. Bailey
author_sort Klarissa R. Wilkinson
title Milk-Fat Intake and Differences in Abdominal Adiposity and BMI: Evidence Based on 13,544 Randomly-Selected Adults
title_short Milk-Fat Intake and Differences in Abdominal Adiposity and BMI: Evidence Based on 13,544 Randomly-Selected Adults
title_full Milk-Fat Intake and Differences in Abdominal Adiposity and BMI: Evidence Based on 13,544 Randomly-Selected Adults
title_fullStr Milk-Fat Intake and Differences in Abdominal Adiposity and BMI: Evidence Based on 13,544 Randomly-Selected Adults
title_full_unstemmed Milk-Fat Intake and Differences in Abdominal Adiposity and BMI: Evidence Based on 13,544 Randomly-Selected Adults
title_sort milk-fat intake and differences in abdominal adiposity and bmi: evidence based on 13,544 randomly-selected adults
publisher MDPI AG
series Nutrients
issn 2072-6643
publishDate 2021-05-01
description The primary purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the relationship between milk-fat intake and obesity, particularly abdominal obesity, in 13,544 U.S. adults. A lesser objective was to measure the degree to which the association was influenced by multiple potential confounding variables. This cross-sectional study used data from the 2011–2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Quantity of milk-fat regularly consumed was the exposure variable. Sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD), a measure of abdominal obesity, and body mass index (BMI) were the outcome variables. Sagittal abdominal diameter is a strong predictor of visceral abdominal fat, when measured by computed tomography, and has been shown to predict cardiometabolic disorders better than BMI. After controlling for age, race, gender, physical activity, leisure computer use and gaming, alcohol habits, and cigarette use, significantly lower BMIs were associated with consistent non-fat and full-fat milk consumption (F = 4.1, <i>p</i> = 0.0063). A significantly lower SAD was associated only with regular consumption of non-fat milk (F = 5.0, <i>p</i> = 0.0019). No significant differences were detected between the other milk-fat groups or milk abstainers. In this nationally representative sample, only 19.6% of adults regularly consumed low-fat milk. In conclusion, consistent non-fat milk intake was predictive of lower levels of abdominal adiposity compared to consumption of higher levels of milk-fat.
topic overweight
obesity
sagittal diameter
waist circumference
dairy
diet
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/6/1832
work_keys_str_mv AT klarissarwilkinson milkfatintakeanddifferencesinabdominaladiposityandbmievidencebasedon13544randomlyselectedadults
AT larryatucker milkfatintakeanddifferencesinabdominaladiposityandbmievidencebasedon13544randomlyselectedadults
AT lanceedavidson milkfatintakeanddifferencesinabdominaladiposityandbmievidencebasedon13544randomlyselectedadults
AT brucewbailey milkfatintakeanddifferencesinabdominaladiposityandbmievidencebasedon13544randomlyselectedadults
_version_ 1721412568129470464