Interspecies comparison of probiotics isolated from different animals

Aim: The aim of the current study was to isolate and identify naturally occurring probiotic Lactobacillus species in different animals with the different environmental background including fish, and farm animals to investigate interspecies differences in probiotics on the species level. Materials...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amr M. Abdou, Riham H. Hedia, Shimaa T. Omara, Mohamed Abd El-Fatah Mahmoud, Mai M. Kandil, M. A. Bakry
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Veterinary World 2018-02-01
Series:Veterinary World
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.11/February-2018/22.pdf
id doaj-8e8c799742b8468fb1668966ebe7ed1a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8e8c799742b8468fb1668966ebe7ed1a2021-08-02T12:00:56ZengVeterinary WorldVeterinary World0972-89882231-09162018-02-0111222723010.14202/vetworld.2018.227-230Interspecies comparison of probiotics isolated from different animalsAmr M. Abdou0Riham H. Hedia1Shimaa T. Omara2Mohamed Abd El-Fatah Mahmoud3Mai M. Kandil4M. A. Bakry5Department of Microbiology and Immunology, National Research Centre 12622 Dokki, Giza, Egypt.Department of Microbiology and Immunology, National Research Centre 12622 Dokki, Giza, Egypt.Department of Microbiology and Immunology, National Research Centre 12622 Dokki, Giza, Egypt.Department of Parasitology and Animal Diseases, Division of Veterinary Research, National Research Centre, 12622 Dokki, Giza, Egypt.Department of Microbiology and Immunology, National Research Centre 12622 Dokki, Giza, Egypt.Department of Microbiology and Immunology, National Research Centre 12622 Dokki, Giza, Egypt.Aim: The aim of the current study was to isolate and identify naturally occurring probiotic Lactobacillus species in different animals with the different environmental background including fish, and farm animals to investigate interspecies differences in probiotics on the species level. Materials and Methods: A total of 44 fecal and milk samples were collected under aseptic conditions from cattle, buffalo, camel, sheep, goats, and fish. The samples were cultured, and the isolated strains were confirmed biochemically and molecularly using 16S rRNA multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis following DNA extraction from the bacterial isolates. Results: A total of 31 isolates identified as lactobacilli were isolated from cattle milk, goat feces, sheep feces, fish feces, buffalo milk, camel milk, and goats' milk. Lactobacillus species were identified based on the size of the PCR product. The results showed that different species were different in their lactobacilli content. At the same time, there were some differences between individuals of the same species. Conclusion: The diversity of probiotic strains isolated from different animal species implies different types of benefits to the host. Although it would be both money - and time-consuming research, discovering the benefit of each of these strains may provide very important information for the health of both human and animal. Furthermore, transferring these beneficial effects either to individuals within the same species or between different species would be of great importance.http://www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.11/February-2018/22.pdfLactobacillusmultiplex polymerase chain reactionprobiotics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Amr M. Abdou
Riham H. Hedia
Shimaa T. Omara
Mohamed Abd El-Fatah Mahmoud
Mai M. Kandil
M. A. Bakry
spellingShingle Amr M. Abdou
Riham H. Hedia
Shimaa T. Omara
Mohamed Abd El-Fatah Mahmoud
Mai M. Kandil
M. A. Bakry
Interspecies comparison of probiotics isolated from different animals
Veterinary World
Lactobacillus
multiplex polymerase chain reaction
probiotics
author_facet Amr M. Abdou
Riham H. Hedia
Shimaa T. Omara
Mohamed Abd El-Fatah Mahmoud
Mai M. Kandil
M. A. Bakry
author_sort Amr M. Abdou
title Interspecies comparison of probiotics isolated from different animals
title_short Interspecies comparison of probiotics isolated from different animals
title_full Interspecies comparison of probiotics isolated from different animals
title_fullStr Interspecies comparison of probiotics isolated from different animals
title_full_unstemmed Interspecies comparison of probiotics isolated from different animals
title_sort interspecies comparison of probiotics isolated from different animals
publisher Veterinary World
series Veterinary World
issn 0972-8988
2231-0916
publishDate 2018-02-01
description Aim: The aim of the current study was to isolate and identify naturally occurring probiotic Lactobacillus species in different animals with the different environmental background including fish, and farm animals to investigate interspecies differences in probiotics on the species level. Materials and Methods: A total of 44 fecal and milk samples were collected under aseptic conditions from cattle, buffalo, camel, sheep, goats, and fish. The samples were cultured, and the isolated strains were confirmed biochemically and molecularly using 16S rRNA multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis following DNA extraction from the bacterial isolates. Results: A total of 31 isolates identified as lactobacilli were isolated from cattle milk, goat feces, sheep feces, fish feces, buffalo milk, camel milk, and goats' milk. Lactobacillus species were identified based on the size of the PCR product. The results showed that different species were different in their lactobacilli content. At the same time, there were some differences between individuals of the same species. Conclusion: The diversity of probiotic strains isolated from different animal species implies different types of benefits to the host. Although it would be both money - and time-consuming research, discovering the benefit of each of these strains may provide very important information for the health of both human and animal. Furthermore, transferring these beneficial effects either to individuals within the same species or between different species would be of great importance.
topic Lactobacillus
multiplex polymerase chain reaction
probiotics
url http://www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.11/February-2018/22.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT amrmabdou interspeciescomparisonofprobioticsisolatedfromdifferentanimals
AT rihamhhedia interspeciescomparisonofprobioticsisolatedfromdifferentanimals
AT shimaatomara interspeciescomparisonofprobioticsisolatedfromdifferentanimals
AT mohamedabdelfatahmahmoud interspeciescomparisonofprobioticsisolatedfromdifferentanimals
AT maimkandil interspeciescomparisonofprobioticsisolatedfromdifferentanimals
AT mabakry interspeciescomparisonofprobioticsisolatedfromdifferentanimals
_version_ 1721232877675347968